Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Vamron

Can Mono bullets be a thing

73 posts in this topic

Hey community got a question. Do y'all think mono bullets can be made for GM use because if it cam I believe that would fall under tech- heresy. Also if that could be a thing, do y'all think 2 pen is good or a little too much or to little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey community got a question. Do y'all think mono bullets can be made for GM use because if it cam I believe that would fall under tech- heresy. Also if that could be a thing, do y'all think 2 pen is good or a little too much or to little.

I'm sorry, I'm not sure what you're asking? I simply don't understand the above.

Please, I'm not trying to be obnoxious but english is not my first language and I might well be missing something?.

 

I think you want to use the mono upgrade for bullets? For muskets possibly?

Otherwise you'd just use manstoppers presumably?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an interesting idea ... that being said, to make it a bit more of a situational rather than a no-brainer, I would recommend Pen +4 (inspired by the DW Kraken Penetrator), but a penalty of Damage -2, fluffing it as a sort of overpenetration caused by the bullet's high velocity and the ease with which it passes through the target, reducing the overall output of raw damage.

 

In essence, you'd end up with a dedicated anti-armour round which helps a lot against heavily armoured targets, but is worse against targets with low or no armour.

 

[edit] Just noticed Manstopper adds Penetration as well - totally forgot about this as I've not been playing a character using these rounds for years. In this case I'd say Manstopper already has Mono applied (similar to Chainsword teeth) ... or houserule Manstoppers into having +Damage but -Pen (basically, hollow point, as it should be), so that you'd end up with two distinctive special rounds.

Edited by Lynata

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually really like that idea kinda make it to were a mono bullet is I gusse better in some ways than man stopper round. the ggroup I'm in ( I'm GM) have a crazy amount of reduction so I'm trying to find a way to hurt them lol

Teyacapan likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, one could say there's no real reason why bullets shouldn't. The physical principle is identical, and the truly unique feature of bolt rounds is that they detonate inside their target. I don't have the books with me right now, but doesn't the Exitus rifle have an even higher Pen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And a rather nifty selection of special ammo.  ^_^

 

Put simply, bolters are normal guns +1. That's their idea.

If you use special ammo to add this +1 to a normal gun, that's cool. You can also use special ammo for a +1 on bolters, which puts bolt weapons to the fore again.

 

That being said, several people have suggested that bolters should do a couple points more damage (because explosions), and I could see myself supporting this position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It gives you better crits, but most GMs (I think) don't use that for most NPCs anyway. Also Tearing.

 

Anyway, having stub weapons that basically act like bolters removes the niche of bolters, which is: armour-piercing attacks without the danger of plasma.

 

Oh yeah -- give the enemies bolters. That will solve your problem. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And a rather nifty selection of special ammo.  ^_^

 

Put simply, bolters are normal guns +1. That's their idea.

If you use special ammo to add this +1 to a normal gun, that's cool. You can also use special ammo for a +1 on bolters, which puts bolt weapons to the fore again.

 

 

That would make normal guns bolters. Why not just use a bolter? If the answer is "the bolter costs more," then the question becomes "what not get a normal gun with special ammo?" What this will result in is SP weapons always used with special ammo and bolters always used with special ammo. The bolter + special ammo will become the default bolter, because otherwise the bolter has no point, since it can be matched by another weapon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well I'm not giving these bullets to the PC and I got a good idea on what fun well be able to use it( even though in the book it says bullets or bullets unless it's a bolter or shotgun ) and the enemy they are fighting don't have bolter( yet)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is still the aforementioned difference of explosive rounds(admittedly more of a narrative quality aside from Tearing), and that bolters still do +2 points of damage more even with standard rounds.

 

2 points that are just as important as the 2 points of difference (Pen 4 vs Pen 2 of RAW Manstoppers) you say would make bolters redundant. Though, since raw damage is always superior to Penetration (since any Pen over the target's armour is "wasted"), bolters still come out on top even if we would up Penetration to +6.

 

And that's before we consider the raw damage penalty I have suggested as a downside when pitching the +4 Pen.

 

On a sidenote, special ammo for projectile weapons is either for specialists with very fancy rifles, or a stopgap for people who cannot (yet) afford a real bolter that'd have these qualities by default. Likewise, bolters used by people who cannot yet afford special ammo for them are merely status symbols. Personally at least I don't see anything wrong with this concept.

 

Also, D'laku-pattern Hellgun, 1d10+3 Pen 4. If we're looking solely at these numbers, I suppose Dark Heresy already makes bolters useless all by itself. And the D'laku can be used on full auto to boot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the introduction of the D'laku being a weapon that doesn't make sense supposed to invalidate an argument that weapons that don't make sense is a bad idea?

 

Here's an idea! The game should have one weapon, and one weapon only! It shall be called "The Gun." The Gun will have a wide variety of special ammo available to it, enough to mimic every currently existing weapon in the armoury!

 

This is of course exactly how the real world functions. If the military wants to engage armour, they simply use The Gun with really high-Pen special ammo. If they want to engage infantry, they give it special ammo that bursts apart in mid-air creating multiple bullets that race toward the target.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Merely pointing out that something that supposedly has a bad effect on the game is already in it by default, so it'd hardly get worse.

 

Exactly how many players in your group ditched their autoguns and bolters for a D'laku so far?

khimaera likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, mono is short for monofilament. It denotes both that an item is bladed and that the blade is edged with a monomolecular filament providing the perfect cutting edge.

 

The only monofilament gun is a halequin`s kiss and the ony gun that filres mono edged blades is a shuriken catapult neither of which should be thrown around with impunity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be so quick as to call a Harlequin's Kiss a "monofilament gun"; after all, the barbed wires and monofilaments it fires come back again, going in and out at amazing speeds.

But I don't see how there could be Mono-Bullets. Mono stands for Monofilament or Monomolecular. A Mono-Knife, for example, literally has an edge a single molecule wide, which is why it can cut into almost anything with ease.

The Imperium already has a form of monomolecular bullets; they're called needles, and are fired with special Needle Rifles (or Pistols). There's no way you'd fit a monomolecular bullet into a regular SP or Bolter weapon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I'd fluff it would be to simply make the tip of the bullet consist of a single molecule, and then only slowly growing in thickness, probably leading to a somewhat shorter main section, or requiring the bullet to compensate by a greater increase in thickness somewhere in the middle.

 

wba3.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Exchange of ideas, as in any discussion. Arguably, some posters still feel the need to add input - such as the question of whether Mono is Manstopper or whether Mono is not possible at all as a bullet. Why would you think a debate is useless just because you think so?

 

I have already mentioned on page 1 that you could say that Manstopper = Mono, yet this is not how the round has been fluffed in the book, so anyone who wants to add a "real" Mono bullet still has some room to implement such ideas.

 

That's leaving aside a growing desire of mine to rename the current Manstopper into Mono, and Dumdum into Manstopper, just because in real life Dumdums are Manstoppers, and Manstopper rounds have little to do with increased ballistic armour penetration (to explain my initial confusion earlier in the thread). A misnomer that Black Industries may have been copying from GW's original Inquisitor game.

Of course, this could also be discarded as in-universe loss of knowledge/understanding, though!

Edited by Lynata
khimaera likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, mono is short for monofilament. It denotes both that an item is bladed and that the blade is edged with a monomolecular filament providing the perfect cutting edge.

 

 

The-Sword-Gun.jpg

 

Mono bullet.  REAL end of story.

 

even a way to get a primitive gun if you don't get your bullets mono treated.

Edited by Braddoc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0