Azetizan 0 Posted August 7, 2011 I'm planning on adding a Grey Knight to my Deathwatch game, using the Daemon Hunter book. While most things line up nicely (as intended), I noticed astartes storm bolters in Daemon Hunter only deal 1d10+9 damage instead of the 2d10+5 damage dealt by astartes storm bolters in Deathwatch. It says their "advantages they gain from their size and superior ammunition quality" are included in this figure; dealing less damage on average isn't much of an advantage. I don't have the Dark Heresy core book, so I'm guessing that astartes storm bolters are weaker there than in Deathwatch, in which case I should just use the Deathwatch statistics. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MILLANDSON 306 Posted August 8, 2011 No, the book is just using the errata damages for all Deathwatch weapons - check the last section of the errata. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tunnelhckrat 0 Posted August 8, 2011 Its using the post faq weapon damages, which is more balanced and in-line with dark heresy bolter (1d10 +9 vs 2d10 +4). But notice while the damage is post faq, the ROF is pre faq. WTF? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MILLANDSON 306 Posted August 8, 2011 It's a better Storm Bolter? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tunnelhckrat 0 Posted August 8, 2011 If your using post faq stats then yes, the GK storm Bolter is Better. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Azetizan 0 Posted August 11, 2011 Woah, the copy of the errata I had was wildly different than the current copy. Also, I meant to post this in the rules questions thread, so thanks for answering it anyway guys. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
borithan 237 Posted August 12, 2011 It is interesting that the errata stats were labelled as "alternative" rules to speed up play, but they are now fairly obviously increasingly being treated as the official stats. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Morangias 465 Posted August 12, 2011 borithan said: It is interesting that the errata stats were labelled as "alternative" rules to speed up play, but they are now fairly obviously increasingly being treated as the official stats. Because unlike the non-alternative official stats, they're mostly sane? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
N0-1_H3r3 287 Posted August 13, 2011 borithan said: It is interesting that the errata stats were labelled as "alternative" rules to speed up play, but they are now fairly obviously increasingly being treated as the official stats. Well, given that those damage benchmarks are essentially those used for Black Crusade, I don't find this to be at all surprising. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites