Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Adam France

The Setting ....?

40 posts in this topic

I doubt there will be any games for individual xenos races, for a few reasons.

No. 1 - Orks already have rules in Rogue Trader, they won't then make an entire game for them when those rules suffice.

No. 2 - Eldar are sneaky, and no one knows what they are doing half the time. I don't see GW allowing FFG to write a fair chunk of the Eldar fluff for a stand-alone RPG. Rules in Rogue Trader for Eldar? That'd be more realistic an expectation.

No. 3 - 40k is pretty much all about the Imperium of Man. Chaos is doable because the Imperium is it's main opponent, it's the other side of the coin. That doesn't work as well when applied to a xenos stand-alone RPG.

I just don't see it, sorry sad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MILLANDSON said:

I doubt there will be any games for individual xenos races, for a few reasons.

No. 1 - Orks already have rules in Rogue Trader, they won't then make an entire game for them when those rules suffice.

 

No.  they don't.  They suffice for one VERY small side of Orkdom.  Freebooters.  They don't allow anything even approaching the way Orks are as a whole.  It's like saying the Corebook of Dark Heresy's handling of the Guard was enough to allow an entire game for Imperial Guard PCs.   Maybe in such a hands off in need of multiple houserules matter it's not even funny.  But not even close to enough for a full game.

 

And Eldar are no less understandable than elves in any other game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

George Labour said:

An Ork themed RPG might also work. Heck, it almost writes itself.

the title would also be the simplest of all the FFG 40k RPGs. WAAAGH! There, new RPG has a name, that's also a nob to the early days of table top 40k.

Though I could also see a Tau themed game before Eldar, as the tau are more understandable and have a lot of kew toys to play with. Eldar would take a bit of work to do right.

An Adeptus Mechanicus themed add on and or stand alone might also be fun. Players could be skitarii, Knight titan pilots, and Magos all working for the omnissiah's benefits. It's be similar to the Tau RPG, only it explores an even more mysterious and less well known part of the 40k universe.

Yeah but here's the thing, while all of those are great ideas, they're also extremely nichey ideas. Especially the Mechanicus one.

Look at Into the Storm. Between one career and two advanced ranks (and tribe and birth-specialty), you can pretty much make any type of Ork that you want. I'm not sure if that's something you could really take to make in to something that isn't just Rogue Trader with Orks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost guarantee we'll get a "Blood of Martyrs" style Mechanicus book.  We're getting them for all the other DH splats... no reason that won't be coming.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam France said:

Endless sub-games, each getting their own expensive corebook sounds like the worst way to go with the 40k rpg line to me.

Aren't the games that already exist robust enough for people to play Eldar? Or Tau, or whatever? If not, why not? This to me is madness.

On the other side of the coin, if you had to buy the Rogue Trader book to play an Eldar, it'd be rather annoying, and espensive in its own way, wouldn't it? This is of course assuming that you weren't already going to buy RT anyway.

But to be clear, I'm speaking in terms of a whole book devoted to playing Eldar (or whatever), as opposed to something more like what we got in Into the Storm for Orks or Kroot, where it's not really built to support an all Ork/Kroot game (though nothing is stopping you).

Dulahan said:

I almost guarantee we'll get a "Blood of Martyrs" style Mechanicus book. We're getting them for all the other DH splats... no reason that won't be coming.

Oh I'm sure we'll get something like that. Though I doubt we'll get a whole new line for just the Mechanicus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 @Dulahan

No. they don't. They suffice for one VERY small side of Orkdom. Freebooters. They don't allow anything even approaching the way Orks are as a whole. It's like saying the Corebook of Dark Heresy's handling of the Guard was enough to allow an entire game for Imperial Guard PCs.

Technically, it was - or I don't know how we played two short campaigns of IG using DH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wilfred Owen said:

Cifer said:

 

 Huh. I thought the Screaming Vortex would be some reference to the Eye of Terror.

I'd say "good catch", but...

 

That reminds me: An interesting question might not only be "where" but "when". There are two pictures with Necron elements (a scarab and a lord). Either they wake up a little sooner in the Vortex than in the rest of the galaxy (and for some reason, Chaos isn't interested in telling the Imperium) or FFG advances the timeline.

 

 

 

There is nothing to say that the Necrons cannot awake before the incident at Sanctuary 101. You could argue previous sightings were unreported.  Besides, as I have always said, the Deceiver has been active for a long time and there are Necrons who have infiltrated the Imperium.  I guess then that we would have some active tombs already.

Indeed. The only comprehensive source on Necrons, even though a bit old and possibly out of date, is the Codex: Necrons, which also tells us about Sanctuary 101 incident. However, the very same book tells of half-a-dozen EARLIER contacts with Necrons made by various expeditions, Inquistorial forces and Rogue Traders, some of these actually predate the Sanctuary 101 incident by several millenia...

I quess Sancuary 101 was simply the incident that made Imperium as a whole realize there are evil metal things afoot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really get the obsession with Necrons in an RPG. They'd make good one off combat encounters for powerful PCs, but the only ones who'd engage in anything other then 'appear & kill 'em all' would be C'tan like the Deceiver, who would be so far above the power level of even DW characters it'd be unfair, and once you've done 'ZOMG, teh base has a necron tomb under it!' once the shtick would get old very quickly...if they do appear i'd rather they kept it as small a section as possible and concentrated on antagonists who have more variety in how they confound the PCs. This is why Chaos make such great Black Library ( and 40k RPG) protagonists and antagonists, their motivations are human and susceptible to negotiation and deceit as opposed to pure combat monsters...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

CaptainSabutai said:

I don't really get the obsession with Necrons in an RPG. They'd make good one off combat encounters for powerful PCs, but the only ones who'd engage in anything other then 'appear & kill 'em all' would be C'tan like the Deceiver, who would be so far above the power level of even DW characters it'd be unfair, and once you've done 'ZOMG, teh base has a necron tomb under it!' once the shtick would get old very quickly...if they do appear i'd rather they kept it as small a section as possible and concentrated on antagonists who have more variety in how they confound the PCs. This is why Chaos make such great Black Library ( and 40k RPG) protagonists and antagonists, their motivations are human and susceptible to negotiation and deceit as opposed to pure combat monsters...

I prefer Necrons to Tyranids for rpg use. (Though I agree both present problems, as they are rather too combat oriented and need a bit of tweaking for rpg use imo.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam France said:

CaptainSabutai said:

 

I don't really get the obsession with Necrons in an RPG. They'd make good one off combat encounters for powerful PCs, but the only ones who'd engage in anything other then 'appear & kill 'em all' would be C'tan like the Deceiver, who would be so far above the power level of even DW characters it'd be unfair, and once you've done 'ZOMG, teh base has a necron tomb under it!' once the shtick would get old very quickly...if they do appear i'd rather they kept it as small a section as possible and concentrated on antagonists who have more variety in how they confound the PCs. This is why Chaos make such great Black Library ( and 40k RPG) protagonists and antagonists, their motivations are human and susceptible to negotiation and deceit as opposed to pure combat monsters...

 

 

I prefer Necrons to Tyranids for rpg use. (Though I agree both present problems, as they are rather too combat oriented and need a bit of tweaking for rpg use imo.)

 

Tyranids are very difficult to use in a varied way I agree, theres only so many times you can reenact the film Aliens! Unless you like all the old Genestealer cult stuff from the early days of the TT 40k wargame, that could be a very interesting game, but Necrons don't even have that-they could do with something like a 'Cult of the Living Steel', maybe a heretical Mechanicus offshoot...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How are Necrons any different from Skeletons and the unintelligent Undead, or Golems, or any other number of random unintelligent monsters in D&D?  You could make a darned good campaign with them and Chaos trying to figure out what they are.

 

No, they won't be the only enemy.  But a random force that throws a pretty big monkey wrench into plans?  A scary thing that shows up occasionally?  And slowly needs to be investigated (Even if possibly at times where the game is slowing down and something needs to happen, Necrons Materialize!).  Culminating late in a Crusade campaign in taking on a C'Tan as Daemon Princes or something.  That could be awesome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dulahan said:

How are Necrons any different from Skeletons and the unintelligent Undead, or Golems, or any other number of random unintelligent monsters in D&D?  

 

 

That is indeed their primary problem, too much like mindless D&D bundles of hit points and powers, no personality, individuality or variation, i'd hate to play a whole campaign where the only time I get to speak to the main enemy and discover what drives them is the last battle against the C'Tan boss, and if I was launching a Black crusade against them I'd probably stand off and nuke wherever they were located from orbit rather then attempt to engage them personally anyway! They're a good one off shoot 'em up opponent but have little roleplaying appeal IMHO...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dulahan said:

 

How are Necrons any different from Skeletons and the unintelligent Undead, or Golems, or any other number of random unintelligent monsters in D&D? 

 

 

Read the sources, I say :)

Necron Warriors and other "basic goon" -types are not much different... Lords and Pariahs, however, are a whole other ballgame. Lords have enough intelligence and personality to infiltrate inside Inquisition and turn humans against each other (as described in Xenology) and Pariahs can do pretty much everything any human can (as shown in Dawn of War). Moreover Necrons have several human and non-human cults dedicated in their worship (as described in Codex Necrons). So, in actuality, they are extremely viable RP opponents once you read all the sources and get over the "OMG they are all stoopid zombies" -stereotype.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Polaria said:

 

Read the sources, I say :)

Necron Warriors and other "basic goon" -types are not much different... Lords and Pariahs, however, are a whole other ballgame. Lords have enough intelligence and personality to infiltrate inside Inquisition and turn humans against each other (as described in Xenology) and Pariahs can do pretty much everything any human can (as shown in Dawn of War). Moreover Necrons have several human and non-human cults dedicated in their worship (as described in Codex Necrons). So, in actuality, they are extremely viable RP opponents once you read all the sources and get over the "OMG they are all stoopid zombies" -stereotype.

 

Exactly my point.  Just because the mooks aren't, doesn't mean there aren't agencies tied to them who aren't too.  And those agencies are the sort of thing that makes even the Chaos Gods a bit uneasy.  Unstoppable, seemingly endless mechanical things that are a mystery?  Yeah, you bet your britches I can think of a lot of good games to run revolving around them.  Especially for Chaos.  The Dark Mechanicum should have a lot of fun with those. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dulahan said:

Polaria said:

 

 

Read the sources, I say :)

Necron Warriors and other "basic goon" -types are not much different... Lords and Pariahs, however, are a whole other ballgame. Lords have enough intelligence and personality to infiltrate inside Inquisition and turn humans against each other (as described in Xenology) and Pariahs can do pretty much everything any human can (as shown in Dawn of War). Moreover Necrons have several human and non-human cults dedicated in their worship (as described in Codex Necrons). So, in actuality, they are extremely viable RP opponents once you read all the sources and get over the "OMG they are all stoopid zombies" -stereotype.

 

 

 

Exactly my point.  Just because the mooks aren't, doesn't mean there aren't agencies tied to them who aren't too.  And those agencies are the sort of thing that makes even the Chaos Gods a bit uneasy.  Unstoppable, seemingly endless mechanical things that are a mystery?  Yeah, you bet your britches I can think of a lot of good games to run revolving around them.  Especially for Chaos.  The Dark Mechanicum should have a lot of fun with those. ;)

First up, I fully endorse these points here, and as a Necron TT player already, have a soft spot for these evil rust-buckets too.  The villain in Xenology was a real eye-opener to the potential of Necrons as viable and really nasty villains - awesomely intelligent, able to 'take on the flesh' of humans, using the kinds of technologies and mind tricks that can undermine an Inquisitor and play to the foolish desires and wants of humans, and utterly without compassion.

If you are looking for a villain for an apocalyptically themed game (actually most 40K games are pretty apocalyptic!) then I really like the idea of a Necron baddie.  Nids are pretty ordinary in comparison - they do not have this level of subterfuge - but 'Crons, with their anti-chaos / warp technology are very scary - they have influence over elements of the Mechanicus, use technologies that are virtually unknown in the 41st Millenium, and pre-date / are possibly superior to that possessed by the Eldar, invalidate the technologies of Callidus assassins (I think that's right), have played with the Pariah gene and mastered the art of fusing Necron and human together - and they serve the nastiest bunch of bad guys in the galaxy.

What's not to like?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0