THE NEW FAQ - SPOT THE DIFFERENCE!!!

[Ryukem 0]

Hi All,

Anyone noticed that the new faq v1.1 is exactly the same as the last faq v1 just layed out a bit different. What a waste of printer ink!

[KenToad 0]

Ryukem said:

Hi All,

Anyone noticed that the new faq v1.1 is exactly the same as the last faq v1 just layed out a bit different. What a waste of printer ink!

Yeah, what a slap in the face to the fans! 

[artemis8 0]

I have noticed only this minor addition/clarification:

The rank of Greatjon Umber’s unit should be blue when using the “Lord of Last Hearth” version of Greatjon.

However misprints in cavalry figure's types in scenario #6 an #10 are still mentioned only in this forum but not in the FAQ document, where they should be contained primarily.

 

[KenToad 0]

Artemis said:

I have noticed only this minor addition/clarification:

The rank of Greatjon Umber’s unit should be blue when using the “Lord of Last Hearth” version of Greatjon.

However misprints in cavalry figure's types in scenario #6 an #10 are still mentioned only in this forum but not in the FAQ document, where they should be contained primarily.

 

Good catch.  The other change is that Directional Retreats is no longer in the "optional" part of the new rules section of the document.

And ... I just checked the Battle Plans and it looks like Greatjon as the dogs (i.e. the Lord of Last Hearth) commander is printed as a red unit in both Scenarios 9 and 10.  I guess the Errata means that he should be a blue unit in both of those scenarios. 

Arghh, so frustrating.  I just went through the process of reprinting that booklet for the second time after scanning and correcting everything in PS.  Well, I'm not printing everything a third time.  I'll just write BLUE in there. 

[KenToad 0]

Actually, the link changed and the document is different than the one uploaded yesterday, so someone at FFG uploaded the wrong document.