LTD 1,592 Posted August 9 Ha! Your so called Democracy is corrupt and rigged. I vote NO! 1 1 FortyInRed and The Jabbawookie reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,239 Posted August 9 That's 3 for, 2 against. As the 3 for are all in the Republic Faction, only CIS votes are relevant now. What do @Npmartian & @Ling27 vote? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LTD 1,592 Posted August 9 Question: if allied space units arrive at a location and inadvertently exceed fleet limits (400/400) what happens? In the event of combat, does the GM simply pick which units will participate from those available maxing at 400/400? Obviously excess units would have to jump out the next turn... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,239 Posted August 9 28 minutes ago, LTD said: Question: if allied space units arrive at a location and inadvertently exceed fleet limits (400/400) what happens? In the event of combat, does the GM simply pick which units will participate from those available maxing at 400/400? Obviously excess units would have to jump out the next turn... Yes, excess would have to jump. In the meantime, the player with the most points supplies his entire fleet up to the maximum toward the combat, and the remainder (if there is any) is supplied by the player with the next highest fleet point count. Casualties are then divided as they would be when multiple players assault a world - a player suffers casualties proportional to the forces he contributed to the battle. So, if a side is to get 30% casualties, and two players each contributed to their side of the battle with one providing twice as many as the other, that player would suffer twice as many points lost, rounded up. 1 LTD reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ling27 828 Posted August 9 I vote no. 2 The Jabbawookie and LTD reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LTD 1,592 Posted August 10 Solidarity, brothers! (and also FREEDOM!) Orders submitted (unless the rules change...) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FortyInRed 282 Posted August 10 2 hours ago, Ling27 said: I vote no. Out of curiosity, what is your rationale? Also, @LTD Is it out of concern for changing a game that has already begun, because you think this will put your team at a disadvantage, etc? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ling27 828 Posted August 10 I personally would rather have to plan and do more. I know myself, and I like to tank/turtle. If we allowed me to pass troops, I would sit in a system like a gate keeper. 1 Bertie Wooster reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LTD 1,592 Posted August 10 The current system forces cooperation and communication rather than just having three players build stuff and hand it the fourth. That, and my side asked this question in turn 0 and planned on the current answer being the answer. 1 The Jabbawookie reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Jabbawookie 4,113 Posted August 10 I suppose my vote could be bought with Ando and Cato Neimoidia... (And any clones present, gotta keep the Zygerrians happy.) 1 1 Bertie Wooster and LTD reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bertie Wooster 1,067 Posted August 10 38 minutes ago, LTD said: That, and my side asked this question in turn 0 and planned on the current answer being the answer. I was wondering what all that encrypted code was about... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
clontroper5 4,153 Posted August 10 1 hour ago, LTD said: The current system forces cooperation and communication rather than just having three players build stuff and hand it the fourth. So... Did any of us sign up to watch the GA play? I know I didn't... I don't see this as being a problem... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Jabbawookie 4,113 Posted August 10 1 hour ago, clontroper5 said: So... Did any of us sign up to watch the GA play? I know I didn't... I don't see this as being a problem... For me, it's in significant part to screw over your plans, since we were playing with a handicap (i.e. legally.) Nothing personal. 1 clontroper5 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,239 Posted August 10 6 hours ago, Bertie Wooster said: I was wondering what all that encrypted code was about... It wasn't about that. 1 Bertie Wooster reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
clontroper5 4,153 Posted August 10 5 hours ago, The Jabbawookie said: For me, it's in significant part to screw over your plans, since we were playing with a handicap (i.e. legally.) Nothing personal. Haha Yea I know, and that's fine. And if the Entire CIS wants to be Separatists just because! So be it... But I will be protesting 😜 1 The Jabbawookie reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LTD 1,592 Posted August 10 52 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said: It wasn't about that. Ixnay onay ethay ivinggay ofay informationay! 2 GhostofNobodyInParticular and clontroper5 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bertie Wooster 1,067 Posted August 10 (edited) Orders are in. I'm going to assume no change. I know my vote doesn't matter, but I actually prefer GNIP's rules from a game design perspective. Sorry Republic. Edited August 10 by Bertie Wooster 1 1 1 GhostofNobodyInParticular, FortyInRed and The Jabbawookie reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Jabbawookie 4,113 Posted August 10 (edited) 3 hours ago, Bertie Wooster said: Orders are in. I'm going to assume no change. I know my vote doesn't matter, but I actually prefer GNIP's rules from a game design perspective. Sorry Republic. Orders in. Edited August 10 by The Jabbawookie Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,239 Posted August 10 An addendum: If, for whatever reason, players attempt to take advantage of the rules for temporarily exceeding the fleet point cap of a planet (and, say, attempt to jump more ships into a system than allowed, in the knowledge that they'd jump away next turn anyway), any excess fleet points above the cap will be shunted to deep space of the same system. I don't know if this will have much of an effect, but it may potentially mess up plans (such as invasions that count on excess GF). 1 Bertie Wooster reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bertie Wooster 1,067 Posted August 10 2 hours ago, The Jabbawookie said: No hate. We all have a vote in the Republic. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Jabbawookie 4,113 Posted August 10 1 minute ago, Bertie Wooster said: No hate. We all have a vote in the Republic. He is the senate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LTD 1,592 Posted August 10 Orders in again. Who are we waiting on? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,239 Posted August 10 2 minutes ago, LTD said: Orders in again. Who are we waiting on? @Ling27 @Npmartian @clontroper5 @FortyInRed Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,239 Posted August 10 (edited) Never mind, Turn 3 started after the opening post. We have another 13 hours. Edited August 10 by GhostofNobodyInParticular Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
