Jump to content
clontroper5

Politics can be Deadly (Mafia)

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Madaghmire said:

and I’m still not sure a no-vote isnt the best choice.

My argument for it would be

allow both sides to gain allies which thus opens up traditional mafia blocks allowing for a more involved D2, may also allude to 3rd party or balance roles 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To me is easy. This is normal mafia. I am town. Those who are not town are mafia. I won't stop lynching mafia just because they are all traitors. Dude, the chances of hitting scum are even better.

to vote no vote is as scummy as always

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ovinomanc3r said:

To me is easy. This is normal mafia. I am town. Those who are not town are mafia. I won't stop lynching mafia just because they are all traitors. Dude, the chances of hitting scum are even better.

to vote no vote is as scummy as always

I mean, the moderator himself suggested the no-vote. Is he scum?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So here's why I think no vote is the way to go.

In a normal game, some players have information other players don't.  Which means a lynch on day one tells us some things about who might be scum based on how they voted or didn't vote, because we know scum knows the alignment of everyone.  

There MAY be roles that have pre-knowledge, but I don't know that for certain.  We also don't know if there is a 3rd party for sure  So, it's likely no other players are privy to knowledge the others aren't and are all flailing in the dark.  In that case, a no vote would at least let us probe each other and find some things out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Caldias said:

So here's why I think no vote is the way to go.

In a normal game, some players have information other players don't.  Which means a lynch on day one tells us some things about who might be scum based on how they voted or didn't vote, because we know scum knows the alignment of everyone.  

There MAY be roles that have pre-knowledge, but I don't know that for certain.  We also don't know if there is a 3rd party for sure  So, it's likely no other players are privy to knowledge the others aren't and are all flailing in the dark.  In that case, a no vote would at least let us probe each other and find some things out.

And only one of us die 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Caldias said:

In that case, a no vote would at least let us probe each other and find some things out. 

What exactly do we find out though?  Scans by some of us, no doubt to be kept private?  People killing without knowing the allegiance of their target are doing the same thing as we would be making a vote, but it wouldn't set the start of a track record for each of us.  Assuming they choose to kill.  I honestly don't see how a round of night actions benefits us, just certain members among us.

 

I don't like it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, The Jabbawookie said:

What exactly do we find out though?  Scans by some of us, no doubt to be kept private?  People killing without knowing the allegiance of their target are doing the same thing as we would be making a vote, but it wouldn't set the start of a track record for each of us.  Assuming they choose to kill.  I honestly don't see how a round of night actions benefits us, just certain members among us.

 

I don't like it.

I like lynching randomly even less though.

There is no benefit in a track record if it's all random.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Caldias said:

I like lynching randomly even less though.

There is no benefit in a track record if it's all random.

Not initially.  But at least we get to know who caused the death (and if there are "knowledge abilities" that potentially matters), and if there is an ability that allows a response of some sort, we may get to see it in action.  Generally I believe the less done in the dark the better when we're trying to orient ourselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Matt3412 said:

A HOUSE DIVIDED CAN NOT STAND.

Also I feel like the the third party [it has to be the chancellor] is going to just be murdering everyone

I do not wish our people to suffer due to a lockdown over the necessity of the wall. So in view of parlance, I offer the house of Matt an opportunity to align our flags. I suggest we expel Ebonhawk together in exchange for serious consideration of including budget for the wall at the next recess.

Do I hear an Aye? @The Jabbawookie @PodRacer

##Unvote ##Vote Ebon

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Madaghmire said:

I mean, the moderator himself suggested the no-vote. Is he scum?

Well, he is the moderator. His goal is not mine so he definitely has his own reasons. It is just obviously they have nothing in common with mine as moderator is neither my role nor my alignment.

Just to see fancy roles working is something that doesn't help me or my party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...