Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
pelle74

Monster movement

Recommended Posts

If a monster has two exactly equal paths towards their goal (for example to the unstable zone) and one is empty an the other is occupied by an investigator wich path does the monster take? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎1‎/‎5‎/‎2019 at 3:16 PM, pelle74 said:

If a monster has two exactly equal paths towards their goal (for example to the unstable zone) and one is empty an the other is occupied by an investigator wich path does the monster take? 

 

Quote

202.2g  If multiple spaces could be a monster’s destination, the space closer to that monster takes precedence.  If one or more of those spaces are the same distance from the monster, the players as a group choose which of those spaces is the monster’s destination.

Quote

448.4  If the investigators must make a decision as a group but they do not agree, the leader has the final say.

This comes up often. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That seems straightforward enough, but it's curious to me why the monster wouldn't by default go to the investigator's space in such instances, as opposed to the group deciding where it goes... That just seems odd and almost a cop-out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FFG has had issues in the past with movement rules, so they simplified everything to the rules as described by Duciris above. The difference being also if the monster is only supposed to go to the unstable location, or if he hunts a specific character type. The Patrol and Lurker types are dastardly with some of their passive abilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's a very good point. However I think there are several monsters that have kind of fallen through the cracks with this rule, that should go directly to an investigator's space, by default, instead of getting sent by the group harmlessly off to some far corner of the board for no good reason. That rule takes away the thematic feel of what monsters would "really do", at least for me. I like the game overall, and have found it quite difficult to win (I've won once in about 8 tries), so in an accidental way, it's nice to catch a break like that. But where elements like the codex and specific monsters for each scenario contribute greatly to bringing focus to "the narrative", this ruling takes it back in the opposite direction, I think.  It doesn't seem like it would have taken too much to add the necessary detail to each specific monster's movement to avert this situation. That's probably being too hyper-critical and I'm sure the company's overall goal is to appeal to an ever-widening audience as opposed to purists like me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×