Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mongriff

AoR Errata Updates?

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if there were going to be any updated erratas for any of the material. One of the players in my group pointed out to me that Ib Fully Operational, the "Dockyard Expertise talent shows a different number on the Shipwright tree than the actual description (25% cost reduction versus 20% in the full description). Also, the Cloaking Device vehicle attachment has a cutoff sentence at the end of its base Modifier description. Just wanted to point it out to anyone that may know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Errata is likely scheduled for ALTFNIADFFFC (A Long Time From Now In A Document Far Far From Complete).

From what I've seen, FFG cares little about getting new material for the RPGs out and even less about correcting stuff that is already out.

Edited by HappyDaze

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mongriff said:

I was wondering if there were going to be any updated erratas for any of the material. One of the players in my group pointed out to me that Ib Fully Operational, the "Dockyard Expertise talent shows a different number on the Shipwright tree than the actual description (25% cost reduction versus 20% in the full description). Also, the Cloaking Device vehicle attachment has a cutoff sentence at the end of its base Modifier description. Just wanted to point it out to anyone that may know.

There's no time-table for when errata update are released.

Given that it seems FFG's in-house RPG department is a skeleton crew, dedicating staff to work on getting the errata updated is probably a lower priority than working on projects that are directly generating revenue.

It could also depends on the terms of their licensing agreement with Lucasfilm; there have been past instances with other licenses where any and all errata constituted "changes to the document" and thus having to go through the approvals/review process all over again, with not all licensors being all that speedy in responding to the licensee.  RPG updates are probably a low priority for whomever at Lucasfilm has to sign off on it.  No idea if that is the case with Lucasfilm, that any errata has to be put through the approvals process, but if it is, that might well be a factor in why the errata is updated at a glacial pace.

It's not an ideal situation by any stretch, and I'm sure they'd love to get errata updated in a speedier fashion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...