[MAFIA] And then there were. . .? - Ended

[EbonHawk 1,243]

5 minutes ago, The Jabbawookie said:

but I am interested in their agreeing with one another so quickly.

Has pod even posted yet? So what would we be agreeing on there??

[The Jabbawookie 5,610]

1 minute ago, EbonHawk said:

Has pod even posted yet? So what would we be agreeing on there??

Just in terms of getting on the same train back to back.  Your response to Pod:

 

On 10/21/2018 at 4:27 PM, EbonHawk said:

Clons think, then not think caught me as well

 

and I agree 100% on the last point, if saying "people are quiet" is the first thing you've also said in half a day, you're on my list 

And by "disagree" I mean "push on each other and make a poisoner accusation."  If that's just lighthearted teasing than great, but the problem is it happens every game so we can't tell.

[EbonHawk 1,243]

1 minute ago, The Jabbawookie said:

Just in terms of getting on the same train back to back.

Like cal and you? 

1 minute ago, The Jabbawookie said:

And by "disagree" I mean "push on each other and make a poisoner accusation."  If that's just lighthearted teasing than great, but the problem is it happens every game so we can't tell.

I don't know what he was on about with the poisoner thing which as you well now but left out I raised at the time and asked wtf he was saying..

 

Also may I point out if me and pod were scum the last thing we would do it vote back to back on each other, we're not rookies ahha..

 

Either way, you're pushing the wrong wagon here Jab, but feel free to carry on, just be warned it will make you look more and more scum to me, especially is Bert's and Cal come to join you...

[EbonHawk 1,243]

4 minutes ago, The Jabbawookie said:

push on each other

Please show me my push on pod, where did I vote him, or tell others to vote him? 

The only disagreement was him calling me a poisoner again, wtf he was thinking I don't know

 

Like I said earlier, you rather seem to be reaching trying to make something more than it is... hmmm?

hmmm, hmmmm indeed

[Madaghmire 7,274]

2 hours ago, Bertie Wooster said:

That's the frustrating thing about Ebon and Pod; if it happens regularly then there's no correlation, positive or negative, we can assume about them being scum. I mean Ebon said he wanted to kill Pod before the game began. 

I voted on clon initially because I wanted him to talk. He wasn't saying much of value, and silence on D1 only benefits scum and hurts town (although unintentionally in this case). Maybe this is unfair, but I hope for people to at least tell us who they suspect and why. 

I also voted for clon because no one else had voted for him. I wasn't trying to start a train; if I wanted that I would have voted for Madaghmire (who had the only vote on him at that point). I'm guessing there are scum on that vote train, in fact there has to be at least one. I am more suspicious of people who voted without giving clear motives. (Ebon especially)

At no point did I have a vote on Clon.

[Madaghmire 7,274]

Unless you meant the vote Podracer put on me? Is that what you meant by that?

[The Jabbawookie 5,610]

On 10/21/2018 at 6:46 AM, EbonHawk said:

30%, those sound like good odds to hang a pods

 

On 10/21/2018 at 9:48 AM, EbonHawk said:

Got it in one, day 3-4 he tends to always go after me.. so as usual why not get him first.. in all he's my day 1 vote unless someone jumps out as scum, if you're going to guess day 1 why no make it better than a blind pick..

You're right he does tend to prod, but he hasn't done that as far as I see, (you say he has)... he's just voted you rather jokingly, none of the usual prodding and then silence and what's more he didn't then go on to 'prod' the others including me who were quiet which is his MO... its the fact so far its just been on you, and then nothing but a smiley face has me wondering

basically this, yep..

either way I'll know if I can trust pod tomorrow 

 

On 10/21/2018 at 10:24 AM, EbonHawk said:

or something to see if you'd bite.. which you did

 

 

On 10/21/2018 at 11:08 AM, EbonHawk said:

ahah, well you're wrong.. and how would "either way I'll know if I can trust pod tomorrow" translate to the poisoner role

you seem extra jumpy this day1 even for you! grasping at straws even

 

On 10/21/2018 at 1:59 PM, EbonHawk said:

because you seem iffy but I'll wait for answers tomorrow, if interested I did breadcrumb but it wasn't the line of text you caught....

and as long as you're loyal to the republic you'll be around d3

Here are your posts throwing shade.  Call it what you like.  And of course you'd be confused at a D1 poisoner remark.  That's a normal reaction.  The scenario isn't at all damning, but I find your vigorous defense and denial odd and a bit of an overreaction.  We all have access to the conversation, and I think we can agree there was the usual tension/bickering between you two.

[EbonHawk 1,243]

4 minutes ago, The Jabbawookie said:

 

 

 

 

Here are your posts throwing shade.  Call it what you like.  And of course you'd be confused at a D1 poisoner remark.  That's a normal reaction.  The scenario isn't at all damning, but I find your vigorous defense and denial odd and a bit of an overreaction.  We all have access to the conversation, and I think we can agree there was the usual tension/bickering between you two.

This doesn't make any sense?

You say its a normal reaction but then go on to say it wasn't normal but an overreaction? which one is it?

and no not really, again I didn't vote him, and did not indicate others to do so..

I simply laid out I would find out if he was loyal to our cause and if he was not then yes he would die today, he is loyal. What isn't to understand really? I'm telling you myself I didn't go after pod as I do normally full on, yet you're trying to play as that

[EbonHawk 1,243]

Normal full on day 1 pod, would be a vote on his head and a good 10 posts egging on all you lot to vote him as well

[The Jabbawookie 5,610]

Just now, EbonHawk said:

This doesn't make any sense?

You say its a normal reaction but then go on to say it wasn't normal but an overreaction? which one is it?

and no not really, again I didn't vote him, and did not indicate others to do so..

I simply laid out I would find out if he was loyal to our cause and if he was not then yes he would die today, he is loyal. What isn't to understand really? I'm telling you myself I didn't go after pod as I do normally full on, yet you're trying to play as that

Your reaction to randomly being called a poisoner was normal.  Your reaction to what I'm saying now is what concerns me.  You didn't go after Pod in that you stopped short of voting him, I'll give you that.  I've made my point, and it seems you simply read the same posts differently.  It's not grounds for voting you in and of itself, even now.

[EbonHawk 1,243]

Just now, The Jabbawookie said:

Your reaction to randomly being called a poisoner was normal.  Your reaction to what I'm saying now is what concerns me.  You didn't go after Pod in that you stopped short of voting him, I'll give you that.  I've made my point, and it seems you simply read the same posts differently.  It's not grounds for voting you in and of itself, even now.

You mean reaction of calling out Cal and bertie for seemingly reading off the same page, and working together... and then you come in and confirm than in my mind..

Going after someone I think is scum is NOT an overreaction, especially as I made my point before you EVEN posted, how can it be an overreaction?

[EbonHawk 1,243]

I'm still off the mindset it could be cal and bert and waiting on them for a reaction but considering 3 mafia, you'd have to be taking that 3rd slot for me so far...

 

As a town, it feels like scum building a case for further in the game, against me or pod... 

[The Jabbawookie 5,610]

Just now, EbonHawk said:

You mean reaction of calling out Cal and bertie for seemingly reading off the same page, and working together... and then you come in and confirm than in my mind..

Going after someone I think is scum is NOT an overreaction, especially as I made my point before you EVEN posted, how can it be an overreaction?

No, I mean I make a statement about something that interests me, that draws my attention, and you respond with denial and a veiled scum accusation.

[EbonHawk 1,243]

1 minute ago, The Jabbawookie said:

No, I mean I make a statement about something that interests me, that draws my attention, and you respond with denial and a veiled scum accusation.

Well, as we're thinking 3 scum at the moment and you come in and read off the same page as bert and cal you can see why I might think that a tad scummy..

[The Jabbawookie 5,610]

Just now, EbonHawk said:

Well, as we're thinking 3 scum at the moment and you come in and read off the same page as bert and cal you can see why I might think that a tad scummy..

Ok, in context I see why now.  I still think it's odd you assume all three scum would push on a united front, but at least I finally recognize where you're coming from.

[The Jabbawookie 5,610]

Look at it this way: when three people look at you like you've done something weird, do you a. think "huh, maybe that was weird," or b. think "no, you're all weirdos!"

[EbonHawk 1,243]

2 minutes ago, The Jabbawookie said:

Ok, in context I see why now.  I still think it's odd you assume all three scum would push on a united front, but at least I finally recognize where you're coming from.

I too would find it odd, in my mind more cal/bert, and you a tad misguided..

But until a better 3rd comes the slot is yours

[PodRacer 1,077]

##Vote Bertie

[EbonHawk 1,243]

Just now, PodRacer said:

##Vote Bertie

I mean yes he appears scummy to me, any reasons though for your vote?

[PodRacer 1,077]

;^/

[Bertie Wooster 1,857]

2 hours ago, Madaghmire said:

Unless you meant the vote Podracer put on me? Is that what you meant by that?

Yes.

Pod voted for you. It was the only vote at that point in the game. I chose not to vote for you; I voted for clon, who had not been voted for at that point.

[EbonHawk 1,243]

2 minutes ago, Bertie Wooster said:

Yes.

Pod voted for you. It was the only vote at that point in the game. I chose not to vote for you; I voted for clon, who had not been voted for at that point.

and then you unvoted clon, and revoted him remember.. so there's more to it than he had not been voted yet.. as the vote you made that mattered was the 4th vote on him

[Bertie Wooster 1,857]

3 hours ago, EbonHawk said:

You mean other than me asking what he was thinking about for hours, then a couple non posts and a meme.. that's a pretty clear motive in my book, better than voting clon just because no one else had... and if you didn't want to build a train why not unvote and attempt to appease the situation? Oh but you did that, and re-voted Clon but only after the train you started had built up to 3 votes...

 

not I am more suspicious of people who do that (Bertie especially)

That's actually a good point. I thought I remembered you just responding to the meme post with a "vote clon" post, but now I remember there was more to it than that. In fact, you and I suspected him around the same time, probably for the same reasons. Sorry for saying "unclear motives."

[Caldias 2,209]

2 hours ago, EbonHawk said:

we never disagreed, I didn't vote him, and said I would hold off till today...

The people trying to make that more than it is interest me... Considering we have max 3 scum, maybe it's you for my top 3 eh Jab?

After all after Cal, you seem to role scum the next most often...

Of you, cal, and bertie, all 3 of you seem to be trying to push the vote on me or pod, reaching at times to do so.. it reeks of pre-planned (as see above, i never voted for him, or pushed him... bar the joke post on the first page when I signalled my intent to play)

This confuses me.  The post you quoted me on was responding to Bertie, clarifying that Pod and Ebon tend to joke fight each other in games and it is sometimes something scum uses as suspicious to throw shade at you two.  I said that it's possible it might be good cover for scum, but in no way did I try to push any vote on you or Pod.  

[EbonHawk 1,243]

7 minutes ago, Caldias said:

This confuses me.  The post you quoted me on was responding to Bertie, clarifying that Pod and Ebon tend to joke fight each other in games and it is sometimes something scum uses as suspicious to throw shade at you two.  I said that it's possible it might be good cover for scum, but in no way did I try to push any vote on you or Pod.  

less pushing a vote more sowing the seeds for a case was what I put