Stranded on the Katana!! {MAFIA} Game Started!

[PodRacer 1,077]

1 hour ago, Onidsen said:

Ebon voting pod, pod reciprocating.

This never happened.

[Caldias 2,209]

7 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

what do you think of my other reads?

Your read on GNIPs seems reactionary since you did a little of needling of Ebon here and there, so his accusation isn't unfounded.  Vote looks a retaliation vote, seems the weakest read.

Unsure why you immediately jumped on voting for Jon?  Is it to prove you didn't have any affiliation with him after I pointed out his absence? Joke vote, maybe?

Not sure LP deserves the flavour accusation since he has consistently been the best at weaving substance with flavor.

Generally, your reads don't seem strong, but neither do anyone else's really.  Day one being day one and all.

[Lord Preyer 556]

TK-2187 regrets to report that in the absence of a hard lead, and knowing COMPNOR’s desire for heads to roll often and frequently, combined with the spiraling you-no you!-no you!! dynamic unfolding, a votezap is hereby placed: ##vote @PodRacer

[PodRacer 1,077]

Suppose I did.. Isn't that my town meta?  why try and play up a big'situation'with Ebon that doesn't exist?  why only post once with that as input at bedtime when theres plenty of flavour related plays being made in this one, why is Ebon vs Pod at all in the spotlight?  

You bought a lurker to my attention, Preyer had posted, I moved on. Wasn't a joke, I wanted input.

LP has replied since I started typing so I will read his post first.

Last point is fair. 

[Caldias 2,209]

Just now, PodRacer said:

Suppose I did.. Isn't that my town meta?  why try and play up a big'situation'with Ebon that doesn't exist?  why only post once with that as input at bedtime when theres plenty of flavour related plays being made in this one, why is Ebon vs Pod at all in the spotlight?  

You bought a lurker to my attention, Preyer had posted, I moved on. Wasn't a joke, I wanted input.

LP has replied since I started typing so I will read his post first.

Last point is fair. 

I am also keen on the "Ebon and Pod" thing being an easy thing for scum to hide behind.  I haven't voted yet because some do seem eager to point to that narrative.

[Lord Preyer 556]

ALL UNITS PLEASE PROCEED TO VOTEZAPPING WITH THE UTMOST ALACRITY! 

We have coolant leaks from the main reactor, enemy saboteurs and elevated paranoia readings, not to mention questionable glow stick supplies! We can’t afford to miss a VoteZap.

What is more, Katanans should remember that failure to VoteZap is an easy way to potentially inadvertently attract D2 Scum suspicion from ISB and the like. So please VoteZap NOW!!

[PodRacer 1,077]

Ok, Ammend my last point.

Some people have had stronger reads than others.

[PodRacer 1,077]

##unvote

[Lord Preyer 556]

TK-2187 to Bridge - Captain @clontroper5 request SitRep update on VoteZap and Chrono please. Thank you. 

[Caldias 2,209]

2 minutes ago, Lord Preyer said:

ALL UNITS PLEASE PROCEED TO VOTEZAPPING WITH THE UTMOST ALACRITY! 

We have coolant leaks from the main reactor, enemy saboteurs and elevated paranoia readings, not to mention questionable glow stick supplies! We can’t afford to miss a VoteZap.

What is more, Katanans should remember that failure to VoteZap is an easy way to potentially inadvertently attract D2 Scum suspicion from ISB and the like. So please VoteZap NOW!!

I'm around and will vote, burning the midnight oil here, but I fear we might not get enough votes.  

[Lord Preyer 556]

1 minute ago, Caldias said:

I'm around and will vote, burning the midnight oil here, but I fear we might not get enough votes.  

Agreed. As poor an option as it is I think those of us online as the deadline draws near may have to entertain the prospect of votezapping whoever we can get a majority for - even if it’s not our preferred choice. We must execute. 

[clontroper5 4,232]

3 hours ago, clontroper5 said:

@Gengis Jon: 7 to hammer

@ovinomanc3r: 7 to hammer

@Onidsen: 7 to hammer

@Matt3412: 7 to hammer

@EbonHawk: 2 to hammer (Ltd) (Matt) (the jabbawookie) (Onidsen) (podracer)

@The Jabbawookie: 7 to hammer

@Lord Preyer: 7 to hammer 

@GhostofNobodyInParticular: 7 to hammer  

@LTD: 7 to hammer

@PodRacer: 5 to hammer (Lord preyer) (GNIP)

@sirfrancisdubois: 7 to hammer

 @Caldias: 6 to hammer (ovinomanc3r) 

 

Edited September 25, 2018 by clontroper5

[Lord Preyer 556]

@Caldias which way are you leaning as of now?

[PodRacer 1,077]

Preyer what is your read on Ebon?

[Lord Preyer 556]

8 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

##unvote

Bridge ( @clontroper5) - didn’t @PodRacer unvote? 

[Caldias 2,209]

Just now, Lord Preyer said:

@Caldias which way are you leaning as of now?

I mean, if we want a vote to get info, it's gotta be Ebon.  I don't see enough activity to go for anyone else.  There's, what, three of us on right now?  Me, you, and Pod?

 

[Lord Preyer 556]

Just now, PodRacer said:

Preyer what is your read on Ebon?

Rescanning his comms right now. 

[Onidsen 571]

I'm here.  Kind of.  At work, so I can vote, but don't have time for long posts.

Also, apparently I made an error? I must have misread the interaction or switched people in my mind. I blame reading while working.

[Caldias 2,209]

Just now, Onidsen said:

I'm here.  Kind of.  At work, so I can vote, but don't have time for long posts.

Also, apparently I made an error? I must have misread the interaction or switched people in my mind. I blame reading while working.

Trust me, I've been there too and made similar mistakes.  No biggie

[clontroper5 4,232]

1 minute ago, Lord Preyer said:

Bridge ( @clontroper5) - didn’t @PodRacer unvote? 

Yea, I think I took him off

[The Jabbawookie 5,610]

Here and ready to move to Pod if need be.  We need to get a lynch.

[Caldias 2,209]

9 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

Preyer what is your read on Ebon?

I don't love voting for Ebon.  He's been vocal (albeit cheeky) and talking is how we get stuff done in this game.  But it's probably best we get someone lynched.

[Lord Preyer 556]

15 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

Preyer what is your read on Ebon?

Truth be told I get more of a scum vibe from you than from Ebon but I freely admit to fast entering lynch-whoever-can-reach-7 mode. Sorry troops! 

[Lord Preyer 556]

Losing @EbonHawk would mean losing one of our loudest players who (while aggressive) can also be persuaded in turn by logic. 

[Onidsen 571]

 I'm up for a pod vote, and I agree on my dislike of an Ebon vote. Frankly, I'm wondering if we get more information by taking out an inactive player so that when we finally do lynch either pod or Ebon there are more associations to look at.

If we do that, we lose some information on today's lynch though. The question to ask is if we actually gain info through that. And if we can get 7 on an inactive player...