MAFIA - Depths of Coruscant

[Lord Preyer 556]

Guys - without chat we’re hurtling towards lynching blind. Only 11hrs to go. I know the hour is late for our American cousins but without actual contributions we’ll be faced with a real problem. 

 

[Lord Preyer 556]

Right now my suspicions* are @GhostofNobodyInParticular And @Caldias for a combination of quietness and giving money to GW...

 

* = backed by their Pink Panther Detective Agency Guarantee Of Investigative Accuracy - our motto: “We’ve been almost right before, and for almost the right reasons too!”

[ovinomanc3r 4,436]

Well after reading the setup this is basically 5 vanilla townies vs 2 scum.

And it seems CNinja is not going to claim.

[ovinomanc3r 4,436]

##vote @Caldias

He warned about being out for a while then when back says nothing. To me that's worse than being quite.

[Lord Preyer 556]

##vote @Caldias

[PodRacer 1,077]

55 minutes ago, Lord Preyer said:

If it does come down to picking a (semi)random lynch I suggest we do not select @The Jabbawookie On grounds that it would be nice for him to get a game in past D1 especially if it were to turn out that for once he has ended up on the statistically probable side and is thus actually Town! 

Still, if he acts scummy/suspicious than of course he should die but I don’t think we should prioritise him for a (semi)random lynch. 

 

[Lord Preyer 556]

Oh @PodRacer never change Pod, never change...

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

2 hours ago, Lord Preyer said:

##vote @Caldias

Why? Do you actually have a reason, or are you following ovi because he has one? If you have a reason, what is it? If it was ovi's, why did you not list it before? You voted very quickly (29 minute difference) on his heels with no explanation. I realize you already said you suspected him, but you didn't vote then, so why now? Because he now has a vote? This implies you are trying to get somebody lynched fast, and opted for the one somebody else had made a case against. It also implies that you may not want to be seen as building the case/leading the train against him, which means you fear for your safety if he turns up town. 

Taken together, these imply that you are scum.

I admit that Cal's action are probably worth voting D1, but without any discussion or actual scum hunting, I find your sudden vote on him (putting him at L-2 no less) suspicious.

Since it is the best lead I have, I shall

##vote LP

until I hear a satisfactory explanation.

[Caldias 2,209]

4 hours ago, Lord Preyer said:

If it does come down to picking a (semi)random lynch I suggest we do not select @The Jabbawookie On grounds that it would be nice for him to get a game in past D1 especially if it were to turn out that for once he has ended up on the statistically probable side and is thus actually Town! 

Still, if he acts scummy/suspicious than of course he should die but I don’t think we should prioritise him for a (semi)random lynch. 

I agree, he should get a chance to play unless he sets off the old scumdar.

Two Banta Blood-Fizz please!

[Madaghmire 7,274]

1 hour ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Why? Do you actually have a reason, or are you following ovi because he has one? If you have a reason, what is it? If it was ovi's, why did you not list it before? You voted very quickly (29 minute difference) on his heels with no explanation. I realize you already said you suspected him, but you didn't vote then, so why now? Because he now has a vote? This implies you are trying to get somebody lynched fast, and opted for the one somebody else had made a case against. It also implies that you may not want to be seen as building the case/leading the train against him, which means you fear for your safety if he turns up town. 

Taken together, these imply that you are scum.

I admit that Cal's action are probably worth voting D1, but without any discussion or actual scum hunting, I find your sudden vote on him (putting him at L-2 no less) suspicious.

Since it is the best lead I have, I shall

##vote LP

until I hear a satisfactory explanation.

Solid as anything I’ve seen on D1.

##vote LP

[Lord Preyer 556]

1 hour ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Why? Do you actually have a reason, or are you following ovi because he has one? If you have a reason, what is it? If it was ovi's, why did you not list it before? You voted very quickly (29 minute difference) on his heels with no explanation. I realize you already said you suspected him, but you didn't vote then, so why now? Because he now has a vote? This implies you are trying to get somebody lynched fast, and opted for the one somebody else had made a case against. It also implies that you may not want to be seen as building the case/leading the train against him, which means you fear for your safety if he turns up town. 

Taken together, these imply that you are scum.

I admit that Cal's action are probably worth voting D1, but without any discussion or actual scum hunting, I find your sudden vote on him (putting him at L-2 no less) suspicious.

Since it is the best lead I have, I shall

##vote LP

until I hear a satisfactory explanation.

Because in the absence of anything else happening/anyone else saying anything action had to be taken and pressure mounted. I was already considering between the two and @ovinomanc3r‘s  argument seemed better than just taking a name out of a hat. I clicked ‘like’ and then voted and then went to work - hence the timing.

 As for your point GNIPs about “actual scum hunting” this is what I was actually attempting - regardless of its efficacy (or lackthereof) I didn’t see very much/any of it happening previously and was acutely aware of the short clock (and the US time difference) and so feared we would run out of time and so added a vote to add pressure to lead to SOMETHING! 

And something is what I got!

At least some of us are talking now which is good  - although I note my old pal @Caldias  is still focused on propping up the bar...

[Caldias 2,209]

5 hours ago, ovinomanc3r said:

##vote @Caldias

He warned about being out for a while then when back says nothing. To me that's worse than being quite.

Uh, what exactly was there to talk about?  Other than the whole Day One vote on Jabba for being Scumman

I do find the LP jump-on vote concerning.  No reason, just looking for a lynch is what it seemed like.

[EbonHawk 1,243]

@PodRacer - (0)

@Madaghmire - (0) - 

@ovinomanc3r - (0)

@Caldias - (2) - Ovi, Preyer

@Lord Preyer - (2)-  Gnips, Mad

@The Jabbawookie - (1) - Pod

@GhostofNobodyInParticular - (0)

4 to hammer

cal and lp L2

Edited August 3, 2018 by EbonHawk

[Lord Preyer 556]

1 minute ago, EbonHawk said:

@PodRacer - (0)

@Madaghmire - (2) - Gnips, Mad

@ovinomanc3r - (0)

@Caldias - (2) -Ovi, Preyer

@Lord Preyer - (0) 

@The Jabbawookie - (1) - Pod

@GhostofNobodyInParticular - (0)

4 to hammer

cal and nips L2

If only @EbonHawk but alas I fear it’s me soon to be under the hammer!

[ovinomanc3r 4,436]

5 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

@PodRacer - (0)

@Madaghmire - (2) - Gnips, Mad

@ovinomanc3r - (0)

@Caldias - (2) -Ovi, Preyer

@Lord Preyer - (0) 

@The Jabbawookie - (1) - Pod

@GhostofNobodyInParticular - (0)

4 to hammer

cal and nips L2

Mad voted himself. Wow I should support that kind of honesty. 

## unvote 

## vote Madaghmire 

[PodRacer 1,077]

[PodRacer 1,077]

^^L1

[Madaghmire 7,274]

Ovi’s should be the only vote under my name by my count.

[Madaghmire 7,274]

Speaking of, Ovi, you have something better than trying to quick lynch under what is clearly an error? 

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

Yeah, joke voting with 4 hours left is an odd thing to do Ovi.

 

@Lord Preyer - my point was that you voted using somebody's logic and didn't even post anything discussing it. That is what threw me off.

Cal is also acting suspicious, since he is doing the same thing, and even posting random bits of flavor to seem present. At least you are contributing to the discussion in some way.

[EbonHawk 1,243]

41 minutes ago, ovinomanc3r said:

Mad voted himself. Wow I should support that kind of honesty. 

## unvote 

## vote Madaghmire 

Late night lol, thank you ovi and lp for catching this edited

[PodRacer 1,077]

50 minutes ago, EbonHawk said:

@The Jabbawookie - (1) - Pod

Where was I...

oh yes.

I probably know quite alot you don't.....

[EbonHawk 1,243]

@PodRacer - (0)

@Madaghmire - (1) - Ovi

@ovinomanc3r - (0)

@Caldias - (1) - Ovi, Preyer

@Lord Preyer - (2)-  Gnips, Mad

@The Jabbawookie - (1) - Pod

@GhostofNobodyInParticular - (0)

4 to hammer

Lp L2

[Caldias 2,209]

7 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Yeah, joke voting with 4 hours left is an odd thing to do Ovi.

 

@Lord Preyer - my point was that you voted using somebody's logic and didn't even post anything discussing it. That is what threw me off.

Cal is also acting suspicious, since he is doing the same thing, and even posting random bits of flavor to seem present. At least you are contributing to the discussion in some way.

Hey, that's fair.  I had to break away and work is slamming right now.  The only thing I saw weird when I got back was Pod policy voting Jabba and Ovi voting for people who aren't in the game, which I didn't think were worth bringing up.  But I should participate more, you're totally right.

LP's bandwagon was the scummiest thing I saw so far, which I said earlier.  Not willing to vote yet, in order to avoid a scum hammer.

And I just realized we have a 24 hour Day one!  Sorry guys, I am used to the 48 hour days and didn't notice.  Work is crushing me, but I will be here until the clock strikes, checking in.  I WFH at least, so shouldn't have a problem.

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

4 minutes ago, Caldias said:

Not willing to vote yet, in order to avoid a scum hammer.

But you did vote. LP is at L-2 because of it.