Jump to content
EbonHawk

MAFIA - Depths of Coruscant

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Lord Preyer said:

Alright Town, here’s hoping! Regardless it’s been a blast and I’d especially like to thank my fellow Townie who trusted me even when there were lots of reasons not to. 

And thank you very much indeed @EbonHawk!!

And now, Mads and Town, so sorry if I’m wrong here but...

##vote @Madaghmire

Well done just in time

Mad was scum, along with cal

town wins

Observers: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GCfEr2LLQKVox2XEV0rMe6xxowxYKxqQykYgj8q4_QY/edit?usp=drivesdk

 

SCumchat: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gu_8DHutJql-gieYpWVkd83sFa_gIcjWpumZcLPlKp0/edit?usp=drivesdk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

I trusted Ovi, and didn't suspect LP enough to continue voting him when no one else did. So it was between you and Cal. You had the potential to be framed, like me, so I chose Cal.

So being cop checked makes you more likely to be town? Well ok then...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

So being cop checked makes you more likely to be town? Well ok then...

 

I am a bit confused by what you mean. At the time, I didn't know if Ovi was insane, and it was possible that both Mad and I had been framed. So, there was wriggle room there. Cal, however, was the last remaining option, and in general Ovi is better at reading people than I.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont really get this. I understand pressure makes a difference and Mad was downplaying it, however,

Pod found Jabba guilty. He then flipped town. There was a 1 in 5 chance he was framed. 

And to make it worse, you all lynched him so you could judge the sanity of your cops! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

I dont really get this. I understand pressure makes a difference and Mad was downplaying it, however,

Pod found Jabba guilty. He then flipped town. There was a 1 in 5 chance he was framed. 

And to make it worse, you all lynched him so you could judge the sanity of your cops! 

I thought it was a great idea.

Also come on, what kind a douchebags would we have to be to frame jabba in this one?

Btw, ive been antitown three straight games, Jabba, so when you brought that up I was very amused.

Edited by Madaghmire

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Caldias said:

Dude you had to, I woulda done the same.  No salt here

Debatable. I feel like I had to assume LP would show up, but with the benefit of my Hindsightnoculars I think we’d have won if I just kept my mouth shut.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/3/2018 at 11:22 AM, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Why? Do you actually have a reason, or are you following ovi because he has one? If you have a reason, what is it? If it was ovi's, why did you not list it before? You voted very quickly (29 minute difference) on his heels with no explanation. I realize you already said you suspected him, but you didn't vote then, so why now? Because he now has a vote? This implies you are trying to get somebody lynched fast, and opted for the one somebody else had made a case against. It also implies that you may not want to be seen as building the case/leading the train against him, which means you fear for your safety if he turns up town. 

Taken together, these imply that you are scum.

I admit that Cal's action are probably worth voting D1, but without any discussion or actual scum hunting, I find your sudden vote on him (putting him at L-2 no less) suspicious.

Since it is the best lead I have, I shall

##vote LP

until I hear a satisfactory explanation.

 

On 8/3/2018 at 1:09 PM, Madaghmire said:

Solid as anything I’ve seen on D1.

##vote LP

Scummy as pigsh1t. You didnt really give a reason whilst bandwagoning onto a vote for not giving a reason...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Madaghmire said:

What I dont get at all is how Ovi gets an anti town result on me and pushes hard, but when he gets the exact same result on Gnips he’s like “oh this antitown result must mean hes town!”

I got a result on you when scum didn't know who I am.

I got a result on Ghost when scum knew what I was going to get from it.

So I got the result scum wanted to me to get, ergo Ghost was town.

 

When I pushed hard on you was not due to me convinced rather than wanted to check my sanity. I said I was ok with Jabba for the same reason  but as long as he didn't go through d1 last games I think you were a better idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I got a result on you when scum didn't know who I am.

I got a result on Ghost when scum knew what I was going to get from it.

So I got the result scum wanted to me to get, ergo Ghost was town.

 

When I pushed hard on you was not due to me convinced rather than wanted to check my sanity. I said I was ok with Jabba for the same reason  but as long as he didn't go through d1 last games I think you were a better idea.

This logic is still terrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Madaghmire said:

This logic is still terrible.

I don't get why. I look for a result on an obvious target hoping to get feedback from scum activity (or lack of it). You could bluff making/allowing me to get a town result on a town player but why? You know that answer cause you chose to not do it. I guessed it so Ghost was incriminated or it was innecessary (me being insane). And I was right. 

I mean, you framed Ghost hoping to me to push him. My terrible logic bypassed your plan so I think it was sound enough. ****! You incriminated him and I thought from the result he was being incriminated. The logic seems perfect, given the truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, ovinomanc3r said:

I don't get why. I look for a result on an obvious target hoping to get feedback from scum activity (or lack of it). You could bluff making/allowing me to get a town result on a town player but why? You know that answer cause you chose to not do it. I guessed it so Ghost was incriminated or it was innecessary (me being insane). And I was right. 

I mean, you framed Ghost hoping to me to push him. My terrible logic bypassed your plan so I think it was sound enough. ****! You incriminated him and I thought from the result he was being incriminated. The logic seems perfect, given the truth.

I suppose I cant argue with the results. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...