Jump to content
JJs Juggernaut

VASSAL: Armada Draft 2.0 (Now Playing)

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Drasnighta said:

Ease of draft useage. In case you draw unevenly on faction expansions.

In the last one I had to run a single tarkin interdictor in the 200pts because I got royally screwed by my expansion selection. I finished midtable anyway so I dont see the issue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

In the last one I had to run a single tarkin interdictor in the 200pts because I got royally screwed by my expansion selection. I finished midtable anyway so I dont see the issue

You’re an Armada God though,

of course you don’t see the issues we mere peasants must endure through.

 

... But isn’t it better to know at the start it’s harder to be “Royally Screwed”?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, ovinomanc3r said:

Neither officer nor titles... nor even experimental retrofit?

Correct, though I could be maybe be convinced to allow Fleet commands and Experimental retros. The idea behind banning uniques is that many of them are enablers for very strong combos. I'd like to tone that down a bit for the cross-faction builds. Feel free to chime in with thoughts on the format, signups will be running for at least 2 weeks, possibly more. If the general consensus on certain rules is leaning one way I can be flexible.

5 hours ago, webv said:

Love the draft idea, in! Thanks for organizing JJ.

PS: Could we get a pinned thread in Organized Play with just Vassal event dates? They are easy to miss for those of us that don't live on the boards. (Tho I'm now leasing a nice summer home here)

No problem! Pinning a thread is something the Mods would have to do, and I don't believe they are allowed to acknowledge the existence of Vassal in such an official capacity.

 

5 hours ago, Ginkapo said:

What is the thinking behind allowing cross faction play? 

To allow people an experience that they don't normally get. And, as Dras said, to open up the options within draft pool. With limiting uniques we can hopefully avoid overly powerful combos from the new opportunities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, ianediger said:

Wow, was my original draft tournament really a couple years ago? Time flies I guess. I'd love to play, but I just don't have the time right now. Maybe next time.

Yeah, I think so. Though I didn't actually check the dates. If this format is popular enough for a casual tournament to shake things up with fleet building I could run it as a reoccurring event. The great thing is the rules can always be tweaked to allow for different and hopefully better experiences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Ginkapo said:

What is the thinking behind allowing cross faction play? 

There are some REALLY mismatched waves and many of them don't provide certain ship types for one side or the other (for example,  Quasar carriers vs Hammerheads, Core+1 Rebs vs Imps gives Rebels 3 ships to 2).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Ginkapo said:

What is the thinking behind allowing cross faction play? 

There are some REALLY mismatched waves and many of them don't provide certain ship types for one side or the other (for example,  Quasar carriers vs Hammerheads, Core+1 Rebs vs Imps gives Rebels 3 ships to 2).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, JJs Juggernaut said:

Correct, though I could be maybe be convinced to allow Fleet commands and Experimental retros. The idea behind banning uniques is that many of them are enablers for very strong combos. I'd like to tone that down a bit for the cross-faction builds. Feel free to chime in with thoughts on the format, signups will be running for at least 2 weeks, possibly more. If the general consensus on certain rules is leaning one way I can be flexible.

No problem! Pinning a thread is something the Mods would have to do, and I don't believe they are allowed to acknowledge the existence of Vassal in such an official capacity.

 

To allow people an experience that they don't normally get. And, as Dras said, to open up the options within draft pool. With limiting uniques we can hopefully avoid overly powerful combos from the new opportunities.

Experimental Retrofit is the entire reason to take Interdictors, taking away uniques removes their reason for existing when half the utility is in objective and setup manipulation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How will squad packs work? Will there be multiple of each one, so when you pick it you get 2 of each squad and need to draft another to get an additional 2? Or will they be like lands in MTG where everyone is supplied with as many as we want?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Undeadguy said:

How will squad packs work? Will there be multiple of each one, so when you pick it you get 2 of each squad and need to draft another to get an additional 2? Or will they be like lands in MTG where everyone is supplied with as many as we want?

My thought is since there will be no unique squadrons, that each squadron Pack would provide two of each squadron in it. I could change this to be unlimited numbers of those squads, it depends on what numbers I'm getting when I'm doing my draft calculations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Dr alex said:

If I draft the core set, do I win automatically as no one else has a damage deck so can’t legally play? 

Either that or the TO states you share the deck...

... prompting you to be present at every game.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Drasnighta said:

Either that or the TO states you share the deck...

... prompting you to be present at every game.

 

So if I don’t bring show up they can’t play?

by the end of the second round I should have an unassailable lead...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Dr alex said:

So if I don’t bring show up they can’t play?

by the end of the second round I should have an unassailable lead...

... and then be disqualified for manipulating the tournament scoring, which is cheating ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...