Commander Kaine 2,660 Posted May 29, 2018 Just now, BlodVargarna said: What’s wrong with social justice? Social injustice is better? It's not about being better or worse. Social justice is just not compatible with our species. There will always be people at the bottom of the food chain, for one reason or the other. I don't believe that equality is a good idea. It's not tied to race or anything, think more along the lines of A Brave New World. Some people are more capable, they can handle more rights and responsibilities. Others, less so. It's all about efficiency, stability and survival. These take priority over comfort and personal freedoms. So, in my opinion, there are forms of social injustice that are better. Not the current one, mind you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SEApocalypse 4,443 Posted May 29, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Commander Kaine said: I don't believe that equality is a good idea. Justice is not equality anyway. Never was, never will be. And there is no such thing as one current form of social justice anyway. Even if you follow that narrative of the alt right that the left is dominating the media and political discourse. The left always was and always will full of in-fighting anyway. ? Edited May 29, 2018 by SEApocalypse Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlodVargarna 4,041 Posted May 29, 2018 6 minutes ago, Commander Kaine said: It's not about being better or worse. Social justice is just not compatible with our species. There will always be people at the bottom of the food chain, for one reason or the other. I don't believe that equality is a good idea. It's not tied to race or anything, think more along the lines of A Brave New World. Some people are more capable, they can handle more rights and responsibilities. Others, less so. It's all about efficiency, stability and survival. These take priority over comfort and personal freedoms. So, in my opinion, there are forms of social injustice that are better. Not the current one, mind you. “Interesting” perspective. I’m happy to have identified another for my ignore list. 3 1 TasteTheRainbow, Red Castle, Commander Kaine and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Commander Kaine 2,660 Posted May 29, 2018 2 minutes ago, BlodVargarna said: “Interesting” perspective. I’m happy to have identified another for my ignore list. Wow... I generally shy away from discussing this, but you asked... and now you are going to block me, because I answered, and you disagree? Way to go man... way to go. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SEApocalypse 4,443 Posted May 29, 2018 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Firespray-32 said: The main problem with it is nobody has any clue what it means. That's not part of the problem, that's part why the term works as propaganda tool. The more you can project into some term, the less defined a term is, the better you can use it as tool to manipulate people. Though redefining a term works just as fine, considering that most normal political mid orientated feminists are starting their sentences with "I am not a feminist, but…" ? Why are they doing that`? Because trolls villainize the term into something bad, by using real or made up extreme examples of feminists as the defining trait of the term. Edited May 29, 2018 by SEApocalypse Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Firespray-32 5,424 Posted May 29, 2018 And I still have no idea what it means. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
