Jump to content
AldousSnow

Ship scale reference

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Ironlord said:

The "canon length" of the U-Wing, foils forward, is 24.98m. The "canon height" of the AT-ACT is 31.85m (34.9m long). The "canon height" of a regular, non-Rebels AT-AT is 22.5m (20m long).

 

Are you arguing that the U-Wing size is wrong - and if so, is it too small or too large? Or is it that the regular AT-AT should be just a little bigger?

Too big.

Here’s an still of Luke at scale with an AT-ST:

star_wars_at-at_desktop_2560x1024_hd-wal

He looks pretty tiny compared to the size of that body. 

Now here’s some of humanoids relative to a U-wing:

img_4557.jpg

compares favorably with stills from R1:

rogue-one-new-image-62.png

looks like the size is just big enough to cram 2 squads into, albeit with standing room only for one group. As an experiment, once legion is out we could cram 12 guys into a tight pack and that would be just about the limit on what can seem to fit into a u-wings space. That AT-AT by contrast looks like it can fit several dozen stormtroopers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The actual troop compartment in the U-wing is pretty small, but there is a lot of empty space around it even in the body - for example the big wedge at the front of the cockpit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're taking requests, I'd love to see an AT-ST added. I'm trying to see how close to scale the Bandai Snowspeeder model is. I got it and it seems a tad small at 1/48 but it might be close enough. My only concern is that with an actual T-47 flying over it, immersion will be broken and it will look like a gnome speeder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/19/2018 at 8:16 AM, Big Easy said:

If you're taking requests, I'd love to see an AT-ST added. I'm trying to see how close to scale the Bandai Snowspeeder model is. I got it and it seems a tad small at 1/48 but it might be close enough. My only concern is that with an actual T-47 flying over it, immersion will be broken and it will look like a gnome speeder.

I own the Bandai Snowspeeder model. I'm really anxious to see the comparison to the Legion model, but those things are tiny ships. I think they should be close enough. My bandai T-47 is just parked as a terrain piece.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finding top views of AT-ATs is a bit difficult. I used the same photo as reference for all walker types. I'm aware their footprints are all a bit varied, but this should give some reference on size/scale when compared to a Legion play area. Left to right: AT-AT as seen in the Empire Strikes back and Return of the Jedi, AT-AT (pre GCW) as seen in Star Wars Rebels, AT-ACT as seen in Rogue One, and AT-M6 as seen in The Last Jedi.

gZM80bA.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, AldousSnow said:

I own the Bandai Snowspeeder model. I'm really anxious to see the comparison to the Legion model, but those things are tiny ships. I think they should be close enough. My bandai T-47 is just parked as a terrain piece.

Just finished building and painting my T-47 for desert mat wreckage. I think it will be fine. Really nice model too, it was a shame to wreck it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am working on a large landing pad similar to what was on Endor. The Battle Kiwi Endor Kickstarter landing pad is 50cm x 25cm, which about the size I was going to make mine. Turns out that that size is not big enough to land two Lambda shuttles like on Endor. I now see that I won't make my landing pad that large, which would be too large on a 6x3 foot board. The only question is whether I create a 20" x 20" landing pad instead. Then again, maybe I will do both as I will make it modular for storage. I am also considering to make a scratch built shuttle to fit. I do promise to provide pictures of all of my terrain. 

My thanks to AldousSnow for putting the scale of so many ships to the board size. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, flightmaster101 said:

I always thought the AT-ACT was smaller than the AT-AT.  Hmm.  I wonder what the reason of the AT-ATs getting smaller as the GCW goes longer is.  Good thing I asked!

Smaller model often implies that it's cheaper to produce. Therefor you can have more of them and supply more theaters of war. If the loss in firepower due to being a smaller model isn't really relevant in a lot of cases you don't lose much tactical utility on the battlefield for using the smaller models.

@AldousSnow Nice work, could  you perhaps add a unit of 6 troopers, for comparing the vehicles with a normal squad?

Edited by Mig el Pig

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...