Jump to content

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Daigotsu Bakunin said:

It wouldn't flip, the province is already filled by the holding, and it isn't placed in the province, it's attached to the holding.

Oh right, whoops lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SlackerHacker said:

Crab three cost attachment is unplayable at that cost. 

You sure? It removes a character fairly well. You'd need to use the Ring of Water every turn to get them to a fight, so they can't participate in the first conflict, or use some unbow tech as an action at some point. On top of that it pings their stats. It has its limits, but it works on any character (except one Dragon monk) regardless of cost, status, or skill. Assassinate only works on 2 cost or lower, I Can Swim needs a dishonored target, Pacifism only works for one conflict type.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, SlackerHacker said:

Crab three cost attachment is unplayable at that cost. 

I'd play a 1x in a deck, only use against someone I knew wasn't dragon or splashing dragon. I guess calling in favors with also deal with this.  No one is really running maya mystic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Daigotsu Bakunin said:

You sure? It removes a character fairly well. You'd need to use the Ring of Water every turn to get them to a fight, so they can't participate in the first conflict, or use some unbow tech as an action at some point. On top of that it pings their stats. It has its limits, but it works on any character (except one Dragon monk) regardless of cost, status, or skill. Assassinate only works on 2 cost or lower, I Can Swim needs a dishonored target, Pacifism only works for one conflict type.

Nope, it's crap. Miya Mystic, Let Go. You simply can't play 3 cost attachments in this meta, two cost attachments are iffy. You pay 3, they immediately Let Go for 0, who was hurt more? People start playing this and every time they play Crab they will hold the Let Go until they see Pit Trap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Etaywah said:

I'd play a 1x in a deck, only use against someone I knew wasn't dragon or splashing dragon. I guess calling in favors with also deal with this.  No one is really running maya mystic.

Well given right now, if World's is any indicator, over 60% of people are playing or splashing Dragon.....so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, SlackerHacker said:

Well given right now, if World's is any indicator, over 60% of people are playing or splashing Dragon.....so.

I think it's still fine to run 1x or 2x if someone really wants to. While 60% of people were splashing Dragon at worlds, we'll have an entirely new field of cards in the upcoming weeks to possibly change that percentage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Kubernes said:

I think it's still fine to run 1x or 2x if someone really wants to. While 60% of people were splashing Dragon at worlds, we'll have an entirely new field of cards in the upcoming weeks to possibly change that percentage.

I could see it as a 1 of that works best against Crane, Unicorn, Crab or Lion, though right now Lion's primary splash is Dragon. No more than 1, IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Daigotsu Bakunin said:

If they're holding the Let Go for the trap, they aren't using it on your attachments right now.

Yeah, but in the end you're still paying 3 for something that's going likely get insta Let Go'd. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

60% splashing Dragon isn't everyone. It does scream for Let Go, and everyone that splashes Dragon has one to use on the trap, but I think it's appropriately priced. And as Kubernes said, as the card pool increases we should see more variety in splashes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Daigotsu Bakunin said:

60% splashing Dragon isn't everyone. It does scream for Let Go, and everyone that splashes Dragon has one to use on the trap, but I think it's appropriately priced. And as Kubernes said, as the card pool increases we should see more variety in splashes.

This may be better down the road but it's not playable outside of maybe a "1 of" with the cards we've seen to this point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Krashwire said:

Am I the only one who reads Back-Alley to mean that you must pay for the character attached to it as you normally would for a character in the province? The reason I suspect this is the case is due to the wording "...as if it were in the province."

Yes, you need to pay for the character, because it uses "play". The closest parallel is Guidance of the Ancestors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Tokhuah said:

I hope we eventually see some Monk only fu.

From an official FFG preview article:

DW7906Y.png
   Looks okay. Bowing a big character and shutting of their action abilities can be very good. Paying 1 and having to bow your own character to do it is less good, at least until we get another one more 1-cost monk or an easier way to ready monks. Also, I wish the name of this card was less bland.

We are getting a new 2-cost monk, but it looks rather weak to me, or at best mediocre. 

Edited by Togashi Gao Shan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...