TheNameWasTaken 8 Posted October 10, 2017 2 hours ago, Chakan99939 said: IF they wanted you to mandatory play this event, it would have been spelled: "They must play that event." That would mean the event was to be played during Coercion's resolution, and the opponent could then take their turn as normal. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amanal 2,557 Posted October 10, 2017 Regardless, they could have used less permissive language and thus ensured that there was no choice but to play the chosen Event as your next action. The language they use allows for the option to be made and that does seem deliberate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Palpster 415 Posted October 10, 2017 36 minutes ago, Amanal said: Regardless, they could have used less permissive language and thus ensured that there was no choice but to play the chosen Event as your next action. The language they use allows for the option to be made and that does seem deliberate. I agree that that is the intent, otherwise they could just have added something along the lines of "and is not allowed to pass" at the end of the cardtext. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vineheart01 6,403 Posted October 11, 2017 Coercion is hilarious if your opponent has "The Price of Failure" in his hand and his characters are healthy/he only has 1 left and he hasnt discarded it yet... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
