[MAFIA] Sands of the New Republic - DAY 1

[Ginkapo 9,320]

1 hour ago, TheToad said:

I get what you're saying here Gink... I don't think that the scum would all gang up so fast though

Gang up? Its just me. Singular.

Can I ask that everyone goes and looks at the strength of Mads anger at my vote and decide if his reaction was warranted? Regardless of reasons that was a very strong amount of anger against a singular vote. 

[TheToad 321]

2 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

Gang up? Its just me. Singular.

Can I ask that everyone goes and looks at the strength of Mads anger at my vote and decide if his reaction was warranted? Regardless of reasons that was a very strong amount of anger against a singular vote. 

When I said "gang up" I was referring to your theory on the scumminess of everyone jumping on the fishing boat... I find it unlikely that the scum would mass breadcrumb like that

[Truthiness 5,696]

6 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

Gang up? Its just me. Singular.

Can I ask that everyone goes and looks at the strength of Mads anger at my vote and decide if his reaction was warranted? Regardless of reasons that was a very strong amount of anger against a singular vote. 

That was anger? Seemed pretty tame to me. 

[Ginkapo 9,320]

3 minutes ago, TheToad said:

When I said "gang up" I was referring to your theory on the scumminess of everyone jumping on the fishing boat... I find it unlikely that the scum would mass breadcrumb like that

I believe there will be a high percentage of scum in the "I will keep breadcrumbing like a fool" group than any other. 

Its still a crapshoot. Just with better odds. 

[Ginkapo 9,320]

Truth. Check the timestamp. 

[Truthiness 5,696]

I'm almost afraid to do this, because it's like saying Beetlejuice...

 

...

 

...

 

But Pod is awfully quiet

[Madaghmire 7,274]

I didn't express any anger towards your vote. I expressed some towards the fact that we keep doing this thing with the flavor every game, but if you've been playing each game this is far from the first time I've expressed that.

[Madaghmire 7,274]

Uh, that was for gink, obviously.

[Madaghmire 7,274]

But I mean, I think Gink is right. Go look at what I said, and then see if you think Gink is framing it a certain way.

[Truthiness 5,696]

3 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

Truth. Check the timestamp. 

Ok? What exactly am I looking at? I says 7 hours ago, putting it at mid-morning in the U.S. I'd see any kind of anger from Mad in any post u til we talk about breadcrumbing.

[Truthiness 5,696]

Just now, Truthiness said:

Ok? What exactly am I looking at? I says 7 hours ago, putting it at mid-morning in the U.S. I don't see any kind of anger from Mad in any post until we talk about breadcrumbing.

Gah. Fixed

[Truthiness 5,696]

1 minute ago, Madaghmire said:

But I mean, I think Gink is right. Go look at what I said, and then see if you think Gink is framing it a certain way.

Yeah, Mad's got a point here Gink. You're oddly fixated on him. You just voted him out of the blue and are now trying to paint one of the chillest guys around as angry.

[Madaghmire 7,274]

Just now, Truthiness said:

Yeah, Mad's got a point here Gink. You're oddly fixated on him. You just voted him out of the blue and are now trying to paint one of the chillest guys around as angry.

I will say that last time he did this to me he actually was town.

[Ginkapo 9,320]

Ah. How unhelpful. His response was instantaneous aka emotional. 

And yup, Pod disappeared ever since I called him scum.

And Toad doesnt like my arguments against Mad Pod or himself. 

 

[Madaghmire 7,274]

Just now, Ginkapo said:

Ah. How unhelpful. His response was instantaneous aka emotional. 

And yup, Pod disappeared ever since I called him scum.

And Toad doesnt like my arguments against Mad Pod or himself. 

 

Uh...that just means I'm online. I think we using different dictionaries.

[Onidsen 571]

Interesting.

Mad and Gink are drawing quite a bit of attention to themselves. I'm inclined to see that as slightly less scummy. For the moment - it's only a D1 read, and as such, tentative until given reason to think otherwise.

Pod running off and not responding is definitely out of character for him. Especially after being called scum. Village!Pod has had a history of strongly and profusely defending himself. With double posts and a few non-sequitur's thrown in, followed by accusing almost everyone who votes on him. Is it a scummy sign? Not hugely. At least not at the moment. But the deviation from expected behavior is certainly worth following up on.

I'll bite.

##vote Podracer

[PodRacer 1,077]

errr pod has a job too you know!!

[Ginkapo 9,320]

Yet is instantly online when called? 

[PodRacer 1,077]

like Batman

[ovinomanc3r 4,436]

So...

Truth, me, CNinja, Mad, Toad, Onidsen as far as I could track.

I have an idea but I am not sure if it is legal. 

[TheToad 321]

54 minutes ago, Ginkapo said:

Ah. How unhelpful. His response was instantaneous aka emotional. 

And yup, Pod disappeared ever since I called him scum.

And Toad doesnt like my arguments against Mad Pod or himself. 

 

Actually I don't like your argument about the mass scum breadcrumbing... I don't recall defending anyone... even myself because you have yet to call me out on anything...

[PodRacer 1,077]

Whats the list ovi?

why am i not on it??

Is that players by the size of their 'LURE'?

 

[PodRacer 1,077]

@Ginkapo

why did you call me scum??

[ovinomanc3r 4,436]

2 minutes ago, PodRacer said:

Whats the list ovi?

why am i not on it??

Is that players by the size of their 'LURE'?

 

Added.

Please, give me two words in capital letters. This way you can be cryptic and I can return you to the sea.

[Ginkapo 9,320]

Ovi. Stop it. Whether it works or not, thats a cowardly way to play. 

Read the players not your pm.