Dial Reference Sheet (Complete)

[Contrapulator 717]

I made reference sheets for each faction's currently revealed dials and card information. There is also a compact version without the card text. Please let me know if you notice any errors. Share and enjoy!

Downloads:

• Dial Reference Sheet (Full) PDF
• Dial Reference Sheet (Compact) PDF
• Resources (portraits and icon images)
• Almendra Font

Edited September 13, 2017 by Contrapulator
Revision 3.0

[Adun42 162]

nice work!!

I was thinking about an runewars inventory spreadsheet.

pick which expansions and it gives you total cards, dials...But without an army builder to match, don't know how much value that has.

 

Edited August 31, 2017 by Adun42
Added thought

[Uthoroc 383]

These are wonderful and thanks for sharing the resources!

[Hijodecain 183]

The work is really good, thanks for sharing.

But if you are able to make it into separate game size cards one for each army this could be amazing! (We can print and sleeve).

[Darthain 1,747]

4 hours ago, Adun42 said:

nice work!!

I was thinking about an runewars inventory spreadsheet.

pick which expansions and it gives you total cards, dials...But without an army builder to match, don't know how much value that has.

 

The value is having a reference of all of your opponents dials.  Very good stuff.

[Glucose98 848]

What did you use to make that? Very nice

[Doodlebug 78]

Thank you for making these! They are great. I will print and use these when I play.

[Adun42 162]

3 hours ago, Darthain said:

The value is having a reference of all of your opponents dials.  Very good stuff.

Ohh, I wasn't clear. Contrapulator's work is cool and having all the dials is valuable, not sure of the value of my idea of an inventory spreadsheet.

[Contrapulator 717]

3 hours ago, Hijodecain said:

The work is really good, thanks for sharing.

But if you are able to make it into separate game size cards one for each army this could be amazing! (We can print and sleeve).

You're welcome. I will look into fitting them on cards. I'm already planning to make a new version anyway, with the white stances in the top row which is currently left blank.

[Glucose98 848]

You could probably put 1 per sheet as well, since you're only ever going to reference one at a time during a game.  These are great.

[Uthoroc 383]

With Contrapulator's permission, I've created a German translation of these, collected in a single PDF with one sheet per page.

[Contrapulator 717]

Thanks Uthoroc, I'll add it the the top post.

I noticed some interesting trends while working on this project. For example, Aliana is the only elf who can wheel (hard turn). None of the elves have a rally modifier but they all have a reform modifier. Crossbowmen will be the only Daqan without a defense modifier. Leonx Riders are the only unit without a green stance. What else can you notice by comparing/contrasting the dials?

[Contrapulator 717]

Small update: I moved things around a little bit. I was copying FFG's layout before but it just makes more sense to me this way. German version is updated too: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8BA4fq7Zu-pdDBNVjRad3hiWGc

[Muz333 778]

Very minor but some of the rows are the wrong colour. This is seen on Kari and Hawthorne.

Edit: Forget that. I've just realised how the rows are grouped now!

Edited September 1, 2017 by Muz333

[Glucose98 848]

That was a good change.  These are super nice.   Now to figure out the best place to get a color printing done

[Contrapulator 717]

18 hours ago, Hijodecain said:

The work is really good, thanks for sharing.

But if you are able to make it into separate game size cards one for each army this could be amazing! (We can print and sleeve).

I was able to squeeze the currently released units onto cards: 

Edited September 1, 2017 by Contrapulator

[Govrek 57]

A great resource. thank you for this @Contrapulator!  I did notice that on the revised PDF, the Rune Golems are missing their white Rally bonus action.  Internet Brews to you for all the hard work!  

[Contrapulator 717]

11 minutes ago, Govrek said:

A great resource. thank you for this @Contrapulator!  I did notice that on the revised PDF, the Rune Golems are missing their white Rally bonus action.  Internet Brews to you for all the hard work!  

Thank you for catching that!

[Uthoroc 383]

6 hours ago, Contrapulator said:

Small update: I moved things around a little bit. I was copying FFG's layout before but it just makes more sense to me this way. German version is updated too: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B8BA4fq7Zu-pdDBNVjRad3hiWGc

To be honest, I prefer the original layout. The top row is for the initiative numbers on the action reference, and somehow my eyes don't look for symbols in that place on the modifier side. Also, having them in one grey column on the right indicates nicely that they work with all the colors on the left.

[Zetan 175]

I love these! Unfortunately, a strict reading of the tournament rules forbids them at tournaments:

Quote

Players cannot take notes or reference outside material or information during a tournament round. However, players may reference official rule documents or game components that do not contain hidden information at any time or ask a judge for clarification from official rule documents. Official rule documents include all rules documents and inserts available on the Runewars Miniatures Game page of our website, those found in a Runewars Miniatures Game product, or any portion thereof.

You could argue (and most TOs will hopefully accept) that this simply takes information from official rule documents and presents it in a more convenient way, but I've seen people unhappy about stuff like this at Netrunner tournaments.

I think having this information is crucial to a fair battle, and would love to see it become the norm for people to have something for their army to hand their opponent.

[tkundnobody 66]

I think it will be like x-wing third party maneuver references will be allowed. So they are just official information

[Tvayumat 3,637]

Or you could just cut the charts out of your "official rule documents" and put them together like I was doing anyway before this handy sheet came about.

Presto. 100% legal for even the most pedantic of rule lawyers.

[Govrek 57]

The Taking Notes and Outside Materials section is a copy and paste from the X-wing tournament rules, replacing "X-Wing" with "Runewars Miniatures Game"

Maneuver Dial references sheets have been tournament legal, including at worlds, since that wording was added to the X-wing doc.  

I do not think that these Command Dial References will be a problem.  If they contained some other information, like dice probabilities for the units, I think it might fall into the "outside information" prohibition.  Containing only the dial options, they are fine.

 

Edited September 2, 2017 by Govrek

[Zetan 175]

1 hour ago, Tvayumat said:

Or you could just cut the charts out of your "official rule documents" and put them together like I was doing anyway before this handy sheet came about.

Presto. 100% legal for even the most pedantic of rule lawyers.

I had considered this too, but it really only helps for my own faction.

 

1 hour ago, Govrek said:

The Taking Notes and Outside Materials section is a copy and paste from the X-wing tournament rules, replacing "X-Wing" with "Runewars Miniatures Game"

Maneuver Dial references sheets have been tournament legal, including at worlds, since that wording was added to the X-wing doc.  

I do not think that these Command Dial References will be a problem.  If they contained some other information, like dice probabilities for the units, I think it might fall into the "outside information" prohibition.  Containing only the dial options, they are fine.

 

Great to hear! Like I said, I come from a Netrunner background, where I heard someone calling a card-size version of the timing structure illegal. Granted, I don't know whether a TO would've actually called it that at worlds, but it clearly stuck with me. Glad to hear there's precedent for allowing this.

[Darthain 1,747]

On 9/1/2017 at 3:44 AM, Uthoroc said:

To be honest, I prefer the original layout. The top row is for the initiative numbers on the action reference, and somehow my eyes don't look for symbols in that place on the modifier side. Also, having them in one grey column on the right indicates nicely that they work with all the colors on the left.

Agreed, I find the white modifiers to the right much clearer than where the initiative numbers are.  Either way it is all very useful.