{Mafia} Killagain's Planet

[Visovics 1,675]

2 hours ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

@ovinomanc3rand @Visovicscan you please fully share your backstory and role?

Ok, mine is definitely the worst one

I am loyal crewman Mike Mothra, and I love small and evasive insects...

That's it, so @Madaghmire, why do I not get a cool story??

Then there is my win condition (not posting as we can use in future to prove someone's loyalty) and my Mafia role: Vanilla Town

[Visovics 1,675]

Also, when I asked mad about it, he said to not read into it, as it was a flavour text, so I think this shows up for JJ, but I may be absolutely wrong

[Truthiness 5,696]

Wow, that's really thin. Everybody else got a hell of a lot more. Sorry, but that makes you pretty suspect in my book.

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

23 minutes ago, Visovics said:

Then there is my win condition (not posting as we can use in future to prove someone's loyalty) and my Mafia role: Vanilla Town

I think we all might as well, but you first. Rather, just the important bit (if you're innocent, you'll know what that is).

[Truthiness 5,696]

Hmm, I'm looking at my win condition and noticed it makes a reference to traitors. I'm starting to think traitors might just be a catch all for this Scum instead of the defined mafia role. That would a bit of a relief since that would put us down to 1 likely Scum remaining.

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

1 minute ago, Truthiness said:

Wow, that's really thin. Everybody else got a hell of a lot more. Sorry, but that makes you pretty suspect in my book.

Actually, an Idea just occurred to me. I'll explain later, but could you all give me your backstories?

[Onidsen 571]

My win condition is also to eliminate all of the traitors.

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

Hmm, never mind about my idea. . . it's just that it seemed like descriptions were 2 sentences 'You are so and so. You like something'. Both mine and Visovics' were 13 words long and followed that format. . . I thought it might lead somewhere. . . having reread Ovi's, there's far to much description for that to apply.

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

5 minutes ago, Truthiness said:

Hmm, I'm looking at my win condition and noticed it makes a reference to traitors. I'm starting to think traitors might just be a catch all for this Scum instead of the defined mafia role. That would a bit of a relief since that would put us down to 1 likely Scum remaining.

 

3 minutes ago, Onidsen said:

My win condition is also to eliminate all of the traitors.

::sigh:: you couldn't let him answer first? Technically, it should have been the less trustworthy ones posting first, so as to double-check them.

[Onidsen 571]

5 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

Actually, an Idea just occurred to me. I'll explain later, but could you all give me your backstories?

I'm loyal crewman Fluke Mudskipper. You ain't on Kansaooine anymore, farmboy! That's all I've got.

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

Just now, Onidsen said:

I'm loyal crewman Fluke Mudskipper. You ain't on Kansaooine anymore, farmboy! That's all I've got.

11 words. Oh well. It was a bit far fetched.

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

12 actually 'You are' instead of 'I'm'.

[Visovics 1,675]

Well guys, you just made my innocence point pointless... eliminate all traitors is my condition, if it helps, Mad used an exclamation mark after traitors

[CaribbeanNinja 6,207]

Well ****.

[CaribbeanNinja 6,207]

OMG I just realized...

I've been pretty much using "traitors" as my label for the scum...

Need to go back and check what others have been using...

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

::sigh:: technically after the first person, it's pointless, since they'd all copy that person (unless he wasn't trustworthy). I was hoping that you'd call me out on my parenthesis, as there quite clearly is no important bit. Had you tried bluffing, I would have known you to lie, and had you called me out, I'd have known you to tell the truth.

Still and all, that means we are back at square -1. This is because Onidsen has also claimed in a similar manner to Vsovics. So, for whom do we vote?

@CaribbeanNinja, as a lone scum/scum with Truthiness?
@Onidsen as the person targeted/chummy with Biggs?
@ovinomanc3r, as the person who quite helpfully set all arguments out nicely and thus may have subtly biased our opinions?
@Visovics for being the 'weakest' claim?

[ovinomanc3r 4,436]

Maybe we are over thinking here or the scum just want to laugh a bit before he/they dies.

All we are scum. Traitor was used by Madaghmire to distinguish cause scum was the bad last game as rebels was the first one.

Rebels between loyal imperial troopers=mafia

Scum between farmers=mafia 

Traitors between scum=mafia

 

That bit means we didn't have a traitor (role) here. I would like to think is not but if we lynch without that possibility in mind we could easily loose.

[Visovics 1,675]

3 minutes ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

OMG I just realized...

I've been pretty much using "traitors" as my label for the scum...

Need to go back and check what others have been using...

I used quite a lot of traitors and loyal as terms, but I think I also used scum quite a lot... My only problem is the useless backstory

[CaribbeanNinja 6,207]

Bah, yeah, Mads even calls them "traitor(s)" in the first flavor text of the game.

[CaribbeanNinja 6,207]

Well.  I guess if there are two left, we are pretty screwed anyhow.  If We lynch another loyal crew member, and they kill me or Truthiness, that puts them even.

How would that ever be balanced though?

[Visovics 1,675]

12 minutes ago, GhostofNobodyInParticular said:

::sigh:: technically after the first person, it's pointless, since they'd all copy that person (unless he wasn't trustworthy). I was hoping that you'd call me out on my parenthesis, as there quite clearly is no important bit. Had you tried bluffing, I would have known you to lie, and had you called me out, I'd have known you to tell the truth.

Still and all, that means we are back at square -1. This is because Onidsen has also claimed in a similar manner to Vsovics. So, for whom do we vote?

@CaribbeanNinja, as a lone scum/scum with Truthiness?
@Onidsen as the person targeted/chummy with Biggs?
@ovinomanc3r, as the person who quite helpfully set all arguments out nicely and thus may have subtly biased our opinions?
@Visovics for being the 'weakest' claim?

I love when I'm a suspect because I'm not as good as the others

[GhostofNobodyInParticular 2,493]

1 minute ago, Visovics said:

I love when I'm a suspect because I'm not as good as the others

Meh, you're lower down on my list. I'm just trying to accommodate all suspicions.

[ovinomanc3r 4,436]

1 minute ago, CaribbeanNinja said:

Well.  I guess if there are two left, we are pretty screwed anyhow.  If We lynch another loyal crew member, and they kill me or Truthiness, that puts them even.

How would that ever be balanced though?

I if there is two left are just 2 options we just need to see why Onidsen is still alive:

Ghost/Cninja(less likely) and Trurhiness couldn't hammer him cause they already voted.

Onidsen and Visovics are scum and must save the day cause CNinja is going to catch the remaining at night. 

There is only one scum remaining who must be careful about his vote.

Lynching Onidsen we will clear that.

1 we lose : awesome Ghost+Truth work. Congratulations. 

2 Onidsen  lynch scum : we win.

3 Onidsen is not scum but we don't lose : there was just 1 scum all the time. 

 

The same could be done with truthiness but he was not under the hammer and as I said if we are right with the lynch ghost vs CNinja is harder to proof  (the lack of a trustworthy tracker) than Visovics vs Me. 

That is my helpful but subtly biased opinion 

[ovinomanc3r 4,436]

Just now, ovinomanc3r said:

Ghost/Cninja(less likely) and Trurhiness couldn't hammer him cause they already voted.

CNinja didn't vote actually it could "miss" his opportunity. That is the reason for the "less likely".

[ovinomanc3r 4,436]

I am starting to hate my phone. It put whatever pronoum it thinks could be worse 

Add that my English is not the best one XD