Jump to content
defkhan1

FAQ 4.3.3 (Minor Update)

Recommended Posts

https://images-cdn.fantasyflightgames.com/filer_public/7c/28/7c285c0c-ee4a-40c6-97e4-692c5c49a16b/x-wing_faq_v433.pdf

Only three things have changed:

1. CROC fore and aft sections are now separated by the firing arc (which really just sounds like "we screwed up but don't feel like printing replacement bases for everyone").

2. IG-2000 title is Scum only.

3. Rule preventing actions during setup.

Edited by defkhan1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, defkhan1 said:

https://images-cdn.fantasyflightgames.com/filer_public/7c/28/7c285c0c-ee4a-40c6-97e4-692c5c49a16b/x-wing_faq_v433.pdf

Only three things have changed:

1. CROC fore and aft sections are now separated by the firing arc (which really just sounds like "we screwed up but don't feel like printing replacement bases for everyone").

2. IG-2000 title is Scum only.

3. Rule preventing actions during setup.

this makes no sense...? Why would the Gozanti have a blue dividing line but the C-ROC doesn't...? Definitely sounds like a "whoops" to me lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, defkhan1 said:

1. CROC fore and aft sections are now separated by the firing arc (which really just sounds like "we screwed up but don't feel like printing replacement bases for everyone").

That stinks! - devalues a frontal Reinforce quite a bit. On the bright side, it gets better coverage when running away (for when you flip that K-turn and expose your rear :rolleyes: ). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, ABXY said:

That stinks! - devalues a frontal Reinforce quite a bit. On the bright side, it gets better coverage when running away (for when you flip that K-turn and expose your rear :rolleyes: ). 

Makes it want to face the enemy directly. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  1. Not really, if you look at the back of the cards they look sort of angled. However not changing the words on the rule supplement is an oversight to say the least.
  2. That was a given, I doubt it was exactly necessary but then again you do have rule lawyers who will argue every word and pretext so better safe than sorry.
  3. Given that there is a lot more Turn 0 play going on to include deploying out of standard deployment zone, makes me wonder what else do they have in the works.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Marinealver said:
  1. Not really, if you look at the back of the cards they look sort of angled. However not changing the words on the rule supplement is an oversight to say the least.

What cards?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Captain Lackwit said:

 

6 minutes ago, Javelin said:

 So is the focus/evade from Hyperwave Comm Scanner illegal now? 

s**t that's actually a good question dude.

Hyperwave Comm Scanner assigns tokens. Assigning a token is not an action. 

Edited by jmswood

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Marinealver said:

The supplement isn't a card, it is a leaflet.

Which is why he was asking you "What cards?"

 

2 hours ago, Marinealver said:
  1. Not really, if you look at the back of the cards they look sort of angled.

 

1 hour ago, defkhan1 said:

What cards?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...