Jump to content
Rune Taq

Armada Sliding Scale Graph

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Rune Taq said:

BTW the AFMKII is the only ship way outside of the best fit scale curve.  SHOCKER!! I KNOW.

I'm actually mildly surprised that it's that far past the curve, but I can't claim to have run the math. Cool chart, thanks a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, GiledPallaeon said:

I'm actually mildly surprised that it's that far past the curve, but I can't claim to have run the math. Cool chart, thanks a lot.

What I found said it was 700 meters. I got the size of the model for someone how measured it with a micrometer. So if the in universe size is off it would shift up or down.  It makes sense to me. It's pretty far off just eyeballing it. 

So like I said if anyone has better Info I want this to be accurate. Thanks for checking it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rune Taq said:

What I found said it was 700 meters. I got the size of the model for someone how measured it with a micrometer. So if the in universe size is off it would shift up or down.  It makes sense to me. It's pretty far off just eyeballing it. 

So like I said if anyone has better Info I want this to be accurate. Thanks for checking it out.

Would you mind sharing your raw data?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I had to guess I would say 1/12,000-13,000, given the trajectory there.  It'll start to get pretty vertical around the 10.5k mark.  Given that 1/13,000 would put it at 1.4 meters (4.35 feet!), I'd say they'd have to break that.

Edited by Admiral Theia
Added more numbers :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Blail Blerg said:

I think the raider is slightly longer than cr90.  Some of these errors might ahve to do with what info you got.  

The article where FFG introduced the raider they said it was 150m. Which is the same as the cr90. 

Of course, it is possible that they were just rounding to a convenient number, but I'm not aware of any other sources for its size. 

Edited by Forgottenlore

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I wasn't too far off (it's been a while since I've played with this stuff).  Plugged in close-ish numbers from the chart, did the log projection curve, and it looks like roughly 1/12,450.  So yeah, way too big for anything but a mantelpiece.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Admiral Theia said:

Okay, I wasn't too far off (it's been a while since I've played with this stuff).  Plugged in close-ish numbers from the chart, did the log projection curve, and it looks like roughly 1/12,450.  So yeah, way too big for anything but a mantelpiece.

Well, it's what I've always said.  3 foot or bust - no way anything smaller than that would look even remotely plausible.  Nevermind how much higher the stand would have to be over the ISD...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I, too, did the math on this once. My biggest issue was the gladiator because the model was the same size as the nebulon B but shouldn't have been. This led me to believe that the scale isn't determined by length alone, but from some amalgam of length, height, and breadth. I didn't get much farther than thinking about it.

I'm curious what a 7.2k bellator would come out to being on the table.

Edited by FoaS
Phones are evil

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, FoaS said:

I, too, did the math on this once. My biggest issue was the gladiator because the model was the same size as the nebulon B but shouldn't have been. This led me to believe that the scale isn't determined by length alone, but from some amalgam of length, height, and breadth.

I believe we call that "volume". :D

5 hours ago, Admiral Theia said:

Okay, I wasn't too far off (it's been a while since I've played with this stuff).  Plugged in close-ish numbers from the chart, did the log projection curve, and it looks like roughly 1/12,450.  So yeah, way too big for anything but a mantelpiece.

Piling onto the request queue, where would a Resurgent Class come out?

At nearly 2x the size of the ISD I'd assumed they'd be on the borderline of too big for Armada (a safe assumption to make since FFG will do whatever they're going to do independent of what I think is going to happen), but now I'm curious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Forgottenlore said:

The raider is supposed to be exactly the same size as the cr-90 in universe. Are the miniatures really that different in size?

Star wars Wiki said CR90 126.68m. But I've seen 150. Is 150 correct? They are similar size in armada. My in universe sizes are just different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, xanderf said:

Oh, c'mon - a curve plotted that nicely, and nobody has asked it, yet?

Spill the beans - what size is SWM20?  Go ahead, drop a 19km Executor-class ship in there...

I am also planning on getting a proposed SSD on there. Don't worry!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, FoaS said:

I, too, did the math on this once. My biggest issue was the gladiator because the model was the same size as the nebulon B but shouldn't have been. This led me to believe that the scale isn't determined by length alone, but from some amalgam of length, height, and breadth. I didn't get much farther than thinking about it.

I'm curious what a 7.2k bellator would come out to being on the table.

I agree length is not the only factor but it's an approximation that does the job.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, svelok said:

I believe we call that "volume". :D

Piling onto the request queue, where would a Resurgent Class come out?

At nearly 2x the size of the ISD I'd assumed they'd be on the borderline of too big for Armada (a safe assumption to make since FFG will do whatever they're going to do independent of what I think is going to happen), but now I'm curious.

I'll work on this also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, svelok said:

I believe we call that "volume". :D

Could be volume, but my actual thought was using Pythagoras: f = SQRT(L*L + W*W + H*H), or even a weighted ratio between the various dimensions: SQRT(L*L + W*W * 1.25 + H*H*0.75)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...