Jump to content
Monkaroni

Rey, Jango and Ambush Clarification

Recommended Posts

It does help, but the problem is that I haven't found anything concrete in the rules to support that. I would even say that it infers the opposite; actions are expressed in terms of durations, not currency. Now we have Lukas' intent to more or less corroborate the latter, but intent and rules are two different things. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are trying to play Magic with Destiny cards you are going to have problems. This is true of any game not called Magic.

During your turn you get to take an action. You fully carry out that action. If you are granted an addition action by effects in the first action, you then get to take a second action after the first action is finished. This is really straight forward.

People are trying to play tennis in a football game and that is just silly. You do your play. If you are granted another down, you then do another play. You don't stop your play in the middle of it, have everyone freeze, mark their spot, then run back to the line of scrimmage to run another play, then go back to their marked spots and finish up the previous play.  Sorry, but that is just silly.

The back and forth in this game happens one action at a time. It's actually a much quicker pace with this back and forth than Magic with its turns full of all kinds of silly phases. I personally like it better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See, that's what I mean. If you say "carry out an action" you're inferring a duration element, which it's becoming increasingly clear (to me) that actions don't have in Destiny. I'm not really sure how Magic ties into that. 

And Mep, in your example you're implying that things can't freeze in the middle of a play while something else happens, but isn't that exactly what happens if we use the "action is a duration" model and then hammer out a queue mid-action? And how about before abilities, what's the football analogy for those?

Again, I'm not saying that the rules, as written, imply that actions are a currency; just the opposite. But it's helpful for me to think of them that way because then Lukas' ruling actually makes some sense. 

Edited by WonderWAAAGH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actions are plays. You can do several things for an action, kick a ball, pass the ball, run the ball. In those plays you have abilities, like catch a ball, make a tackle, dodge a tackle. What you cannot do is take a play inside of a play. You don't pass the ball, stop while the ball is in the air, then hand off the ball to the running back to run the ball up the field, then go back to the ball being up in the air. As part of the play you can have your running back make a block, Before the pass, so the ball is thrown before a tackle is made.

In the case of the Rey deck when you are granted multiple additional actions by abilities from the first action, you do need to keep track of them, sorta like currency I guess. A better way to think of them is maybe you get to play more downs. 

The language is there, additional actions, not you can do more stuff in the current action, and the current action must be fully resolved and finished before you can do an additional action. I can kind of see where people are coming from by trying to do actions inside of actions but the way the game is actually played just makes so much sense it is hard for me to see why people are having difficulty seeing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd cry myself to sleep at night if I didn't have so many likes to balance out the ignores. 

I can explain through analogy too. Watch this: having an action in Destiny is like receiving priority in Magic. :D

Edited by WonderWAAAGH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do believe we agreed on one or two things in the past, but if FFG puts a Before effect on the release of a comprehensive rule book, me agreeing that pie is better than cake is moot.

At this point the queue becomes full with an argument over if Force of Will denying the consumption of a baked good happens in the same action FFG releases updated rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

White cake is the best, though I haven't quite determined the optimal way to phonetically* spell out the initial aspirated sound Leo style. Hhwhite cake just isn't cutting it. 

* not to be confused with Phoenitically, since I don't think they partook of such baked goods in the Levantine region 2,500 years ago.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...