Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
987654321

Breaking Breaking of the Fellowship

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone(no, I'm not Seastan), this is my first post ever at this forum and I had a thought about how to cancel the nastiest treachery in Breaking of the Fellowship without spending a Test of Will or Eleanor action and was not sure if it's totally legal.

 

Look: fallen into evil transforms a hero into an enemy. However, it never says its text box is blanked (otherwise you would have 0 attack Merry, but if it's not blanked, you can choose Galadriel and she wouldn't attack you). If you attach it to Boromir or Caldara you can suicide them, and all their attachments will inmediately be discarded. Then you use fortune or fate to bring them back without fallen into evil.

 

Also a doubt: if you control 4 dwarves and then you play ally gloin or bifur, can you trigger their responses?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Look: fallen into evil transforms a hero into an enemy. However, it never says its text box is blanked (otherwise you would have 0 attack Merry, but if it's not blanked, you can choose Galadriel and she wouldn't attack you). If you attach it to Boromir or Caldara you can suicide them, and all their attachments will inmediately be discarded. Then you use fortune or fate to bring them back without fallen into evil.

 

Merry would actually have 0 attack.  Once Fallen into Evil makes your hero an enemy, you no longer control it.  So Merry's attack would get reduced to zero because the reference to "you" on Merry's card isn't directed at any particular player anymore.  At least, this is how I would interpret it.  Also, you wouldn't be able to trigger Caldara or Boromir's ability since you don't control them anymore.

 

You are right that Galadriel wouldn't be able to attack.

 

Also a doubt: if you control 4 dwarves and then you play ally gloin or bifur, can you trigger their responses?

 

Yes, you are allowed to trigger the responses on those Dwarves if they are your 5th Dwarf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wondered about Merry as well, I played this scenario just last weekend.  I decided to let the text assume "you" meant me, the owner of the card, so he had 1 attack whenever Frodo was on my side of the table (this was a Merry/Boromir/Aragorn deck).

 

Even if the "you" would still refer to the player, Merry wouldn't count himself because he is no longer a "hero" and he isn't under my control anyway (you only count Hobbit heroes that you control for his ability). 

 

If "you" appears on a shadow effect, it refers to the defending player.  If it is simply on an enemy card, I suppose it could refer to any player that the enemy is interacting with...?  I don't think it should simply be "nobody."  Lacking a definition, it could be "nobody," but it could also be "the engaged player" (which would still be "nobody" if he gets pushed back to the staging area).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with GrandSpleen on this. As Fallen into Evil doesn't mention card text blanking, I'd say that applicable effects on such card are still active. So, I'd give Merry attack strength equal to number of hobbit heroes defending player controls (=you).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you can choose Galadriel and she wouldn't attack you

 

This is clever! But could you attack her? She can't defend...

 

What happens to the hero with Fallen Into Evil at the end of the game, if it hasn't been recovered or killed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

you can choose Galadriel and she wouldn't attack you

 

This is clever! But could you attack her? She can't defend...

 

According to a brief look at the Core Set rules, I'm pretty sure you could attack her.  Nothing in the rule book says that when a player declares an attack against an enemy that it is "defending" it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

you can choose Galadriel and she wouldn't attack you

 

This is clever! But could you attack her? She can't defend...

 

According to a brief look at the Core Set rules, I'm pretty sure you could attack her.  Nothing in the rule book says that when a player declares an attack against an enemy that it is "defending" it

 

 

This is true, and there have until very lately been no cards that refer to an enemy as defending, but Na’asiyah does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

you can choose Galadriel and she wouldn't attack you

 

This is clever! But could you attack her? She can't defend...

 

According to a brief look at the Core Set rules, I'm pretty sure you could attack her.  Nothing in the rule book says that when a player declares an attack against an enemy that it is "defending" it

 

 

This is true, and there have until very lately been no cards that refer to an enemy as defending, but Na’asiyah does.

 

 

Interesting.  I haven't gotten to Na'asiyah yet, but that's an interesting precedent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Intriguing! I'm still not sure whether you're allowed to trigger actions on encounter cards with "you" on it, but maybe so. In any case, Boromir's second effect can be! That is actually perfect, even when Fallen Into Evil he can sacrifice himself!

Edited by NathanH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...