[Skirmish] Lock On Vs Cunning

[Budmilka_fr 3]

Hi, 

 

I attack Jyn who has Cunning with my AT-ST. The defending player rolls an "anti-surge", and I decide to play my Lock On card to apply "-1 anti-Surge".

Cunning says to apply +1 block for each anti-surge result.

 

What is the timing here ? As the attacker, I have priority and decide to remove the anti-surge first (as there is no anti-surge ther would be no +1block with Cunning), or as the timing is the same  ("while attacking" and "while defending"), we add everything and then substract everything ? Don't know why it would be the latter, but still I'm not sure.

 

Thanks.

Edited December 30, 2015 by Budmilka_fr

[MikeNYHC 217]

According to the RRG during an attack. The attacker resolves their effects first so your first scenario sounds correct.

[jespernohr 61]

Also remember that the latest FAQ have clarified that Weaken takes effect before Cunning.

[Fizz 986]

According to the FAQ, Weakened is not an attacker or defender effect and is considered a "mission rule". Weakened is *ALWAYS* applied prior to Cunning.

[Budmilka_fr 3]

Thanks !