WonderWAAAGH 7,153 Posted June 8, 2015 You're right, intent isn't relevant; the only thing that's relevant is what they actually do, and what you can prove. There's a fundamental flaw with a system that permits disqualification based on assumption alone. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ScottieATF 2,864 Posted June 8, 2015 Then under your way of thinking no TO can take action against a player for anything as, short of a confession, they are never going to actually know the intent of a player in the matter. You are asking for a heavier burden on intent then even a court of law does for criminal manners. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
