Garn 0 Posted August 29, 2009 I have a question - is +1 supporting value for Archon is correct? In original StarCraft he has +2 supporting value. Why he is so weak? He have more powerfull attack than Tank or Ultralisk! This is a mistake or part of balance? [sorry for my english] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Galdred 18 Posted August 30, 2009 Yes it is. It was done in order to rebalance the Archon, which was considered too powerful before. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stefan 732 Posted September 1, 2009 ...as was the cost of the Archon, which was increased by one two the finale value of 2 gas. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Garn 0 Posted September 2, 2009 Yes, but this is because his final cost must be 4 like Reaver or Siege Tank(Leg Enhancements Technology card was used with their cost) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stefan 732 Posted September 2, 2009 I don't critizise the decision, I simply stated it in case someone hadn't noticed Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites