Terrorping 78 Posted October 15, 2014 I'm probably over thinking it but the card text states ( paraphrasing ) if the " target has no focus or evade tokens " . As its an OR noit an AND, can the target have a focus but not an evade and the effect still kicks in? Cheers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Parravon 5,216 Posted October 15, 2014 (edited) Correct. NO. It's neither token. It doesn't have to be both. Edit: Oops. My bad, didn't read that properly. DR4CO has it correct. Edited October 15, 2014 by Parravon 1 Terrorping reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DR4CO 5,494 Posted October 15, 2014 (edited) The effect cannot kick in unless the target has neither an Evade or Focus token. If any green tokens are present, you cannot activate Opportunist. Edited October 15, 2014 by DR4CO 2 oneway and Smuggler reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Forgottenlore 9,801 Posted October 15, 2014 (edited) The effect cannot kick in unless the target has neither an Evade or Focus token. If any green tokens are present, you cannot activate Opportunist.That is how I read it. I can see some room for the alternate interpretation though.Just for everyone's reference, here is the full text. When attacking, if the defender does not have any focus or evade tokens, you may receive 1 stress token to roll 1 additional attack die. You cannot use this ability if you have any stress tokens. Edited October 15, 2014 by Forgottenlore 1 oneway reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrCorellian 60 Posted October 15, 2014 (edited) Huh. That's an interesting way to read the rules. "...if the defender does not have any focus [tokens] or [does not have any] evade tokens..." I wouldn't have realized it could be read that way, but I kind of see where you're coming from. Definitely agree with the others though that it's not the correct way to interpret the card. The card is talking about "focus or evade" as a lump. If the card had meant to only need either no focus or no evade tokens, it would have been much easier/clearer to write it as: "...if the defender has no focus tokens or no evade tokens..." Edited October 15, 2014 by MrCorellian 1 Smuggler reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Terrorping 78 Posted October 15, 2014 Cheers chaps! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Keffisch 2,642 Posted October 15, 2014 When I saw the title of this thread my mind went elsewhere. 2 VorackTheGrim and Tenka reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites