Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Distractionbeast

Community Errata

110 posts in this topic

I would make Favor of the Lady something like this:

 

Spirit Attachment

Cost: 2

Condition.

 

Attach to a hero.

 

Limit 1 per hero(?).

 

Attached hero gets +1 Willpower. (+2 Willpower instead if he is the only questing hero you control.)

 

Interesting idea!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is just me, maybe, but I wouldn't errata cards to make them more powerful, only less.

 

Blue mountain trader should legitimately be once per round, so that players can't just rearrange all their resources at will.

 

But I don't see anything wrong with Favor of the Lady. It's a bit of a weak card, because 1 card + 2 resources (especially in Spirit!) for 1 willpower is not very efficient. Though it's less fragile than allies in most scenarios, which makes it a little better than you might expect.

 

Regardless, I think that's an example of a kind of card that must exist in a game like this: a sub-optimal card.

 

Imagine another game like LOTR:LCG, where each card adds pretty linearly to the power of things you have in play. (Outlands doesn't work like that, but playing one more dwarf doesn't exponentially increase the power of your other dwarves. Same with just about everything that isn't Outlands.) The more similar the cards are in power level and cost, the less it matters what cards you pick for your decks. You could just throw in anything, and do about as well as someone who really knows the game and puts a lot of thought into their choices.

 

But when the cards vary in power level, picking the best cards for your deck is an important skill that differentiates better players from worse.

 

And then you can consider that the power level of cards varies with the different quests. Willpower boosts are more valuable in quests that use the stat for more than just questing. And, of course, they're entirely worthless if you're just going to be doing Siege/Battle.

Yes and no.

 

Deckbuilding is more than just figuring out the most powerful cards, you also need cards that have synergy, cover weaknesses, counter threats from the encounter deck effectively, work well with partner decks (if applicable), ect. Almost anyone can tell you if a card is "powerful", but only the skilled deckbuilders can direct and balance that power appropriately. 

 

Therefore, if there was a game where every card was about the same power level, there would still be differentiation between skilled and non-skilled deck builders, because the skilled deck builder looks at all the things mentioned above, not just how powerful a card is in it's own vacuum. 

 

What's my point? Favor of the lady is a pretty mediocre card not only because of its lack of obvious power, but because of it's lack of synergy with other cards and because of that, without knowing future cards, it doesn't really deserve a card slot at it's current power level. I could be wrong, maybe a deckbuilder more skilled than I could find a deck where this is the best card to take up 1-3 slots for that deck, but I very much doubt it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd add restricted to a ton of cards. SoG and UC for example. I'd also put a hand limit of 8 cards, so you need to discard at the end of the turn if your over 8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Favor of the Lady is viable in a quest like, but not necessarily limited to, Journey to Rhosgobel where alot of treachery cards deal damage to exhausted, questing or characters with no attachments. In the instance where your 2WP but 1HP allies die off quite easily because you cannot keep readying attachments on all of them, that small +1WP, which cannot be removed by treachery as fast as your weak allies, suddenly has more worth.

Just a thought to contemplate.

NotAZombie likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like what you are trying to do, but I'd stick to minor changes.

 

I think Favor of the Lady would work with a cost of 1, because it's in the Willpower sphere. It would be usefull in quests with much Ally hate.

 

Power in Earth could be -2 or -3. The effect is equivalent for many locations and it won't broke high Threat other Locations.

Edited by karagh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like what you are trying to do, but I'd stick to minor changes.

 

I think Favor of the Lady would work with a cost of 1, because it's in the Willpower sphere. It would be usefull in quests with much Ally hate.

 

Power in Earth could be -2 or -3. The effect is equivalent for many locations and it won't broke high Threat other Locations.

I'll stick for no changes at all. I'll just mourn those wasted card slots and design possibilities. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, the only quest where Favor of the Lady is semi-viable is AJTR. Now that's some serious stuff, man.

Well I did write "not necessarily limited to".

Do try to keep up.

NotAZombie likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So, the only quest where Favor of the Lady is semi-viable is AJTR. Now that's some serious stuff, man.

Well I did write "not necessarily limited to".

Do try to keep up.

 

Would raising number of quests where it is semi-viable to 2 or 3 change something? That's a rhetorical question, by the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the idea of a lot of player cards is for specific quests. The card is not good or bad if it runs in all scenarios. Each card depends of each scenario. For example, Ever My Heart Rises (when there are mountain locations).

So Favor of the Lady is a very good card in scenarios like: Dead Mashes, Shadow of the Past, Stone of Erech, Druadan Forest, Orc Hunting (a fanmade of mine ^^), Redhorn Gate...

Edited by Mndela

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another reason: cards are not good or bad as alone cards. They are good or bad in relation to another combos. So Favor of Lady is very good, for example, with Unexpected Courage, in, for example, Dead Mashes.

Nerdmeister and NotAZombie like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dbeast, thank you for opening this topic. I really dislike cards that glue to my binders and never see play. Waste of cardboard, space, art, design, etc.

 

Mndela, I prefer when cards can be useful in many quests as possible. Some cards being better in some quest are OK. But cards that are only going to see play in one or two quests? Not a fan =/

 

I'm with alogos that we need to put things in the context and look to similar cards to help balance.

 

I'm with danpoage when he says that simple modifications are better. Because it is more elegant, easier to remember and better for the game.

 

Next reply my list of opinions on the cards that were already suggested in this topic.

Edited by Edvando

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Below my personal list of changes that I like and would use no problem at all.

 

Power in the Earth: -2 threat.

 

Blue Mountain Trader: Once per round.

 

Favor of the Lady: Cost 1.

 

Will of the West: Add "Victory: 1" (I dont care what the rules say)

 
Horn of Gondor: Add "Limit (3 times per round.)"
 
Legacy of Durin: Add "exhaust Legacy of Durin to"
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some new suggestions:

 

*DISCLAIMER: Some of my opinions are personal taste and I will say so. So i don't expect people to agree. The other examples, yes, i care if you agree or not =]

 

Dunedain Cache: Cost 1.

 

I never saw this attachment in any deck, even online.

 

Dwalin: After Dwalin attacks and destroys an enemy, lower your threat by 1.

 

Hate that he is only used against some decks. Heroes should be generic and this Dwalin above would be awesome to play with.

 

Glorfindel (lore): Remove "once per round".

 

He cost A LOT, so his ability should be worth to put on the table, like Elrond. Maybe this help (probable not).

 

Bilbo: Draws 1 additional card in the resource phase.

 

When I play him, I am the person that want to draw more! This is personal taste.

 

Mirlond: Each hero you control gets -1 threat cost.

 

So she can see more play. Another personal taste.

 

Pippin (spirit): Remove "If each hero you control has the Hobbit trait, Pippin gains:"

 

Pippin lore is so much better and this requirement make him too much specialized to hobbit decks. I would also change his name to some less know hobbit, so he can pair up with the other Pippin and increase the hobbit deck possibilities. If you also make that the enemy can't engage anymore (like some people wrongly think him works), he would be a REALLY good deck for some decks and see more play. Maybe making Dunhere decks more viable against harder quests.

 

Thalin is playable, but I hate to put his 1 WP to quest. I would remove -1 def to +1 wp. Maybe this make him OP, but right now staging sniping is not really a good deck for most quests.

 

Brand is playable, but overshadowed by legolas that is REALLY good, so I never see him played. Make +1 HP, -1 Def, helps him, so that he can quest and be better at soaking undefended attacks and suffering through treachery cards. Also could be -1 def, -1 threat. Bard suffer the same fate of Brand, but less so. Personal taste.

 

Theoden is really underwhelming, but playable. If solo, he gives +1 WP to another hero (cos generally at least one hero will stay ready to atk/def, seeing that he works with tactics). In Multiplayer, he can be quite good, but not really cos most tactics heroes don't want to quest. So maybe +2, +3 in the best case scenario. Remember that the self +1 WP is already in his threat cost. My opinion is that he should give +1 to every tactic or rohan and don't care for printed, making song of battle a little better. Personal taste.

 

Ancient Mathon: "you draws 3 cards". Same as Bilbo, personal taste and greed.

Edited by Edvando

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another reason: cards are not good or bad as alone cards. They are good or bad in relation to another combos. So Favor of Lady is very good, for example, with Unexpected Courage, in, for example, Dead Mashes.

 

Yes, but 2 resource and 1 card is still high. We should adress Outlands one post or another : 2 cost, 1 card, a hell lot more powerfull than Favor of the Lady.

Also, Dunedan Quest is better, you can move it. Celebrian's Stone is +2 with a bonus for Aragorn, while being restricted so it's a balanced.

Unexpected Courage will be balanced the day readying card would be all over our card pool, which will happen one day, be it 20 years from now, or never at death of the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 We should adress Outlands one post or another : 2 cost, 1 card, a hell lot more powerfull than Favor of the Lady.

Also, Dunedan Quest is better, you can move it. Celebrian's Stone is +2 with a bonus for Aragorn, while being restricted so it's a balanced.

Unexpected Courage will be balanced the day readying card would be all over our card pool, which will happen one day, be it 20 years from now, or never at death of the game.

 

Since outlands is a very mutable resource, would you care to elaborate what you believe one gets for a 2 cost card?

 

Dunedain Quest takes resources to move it; you´re kinda making it sound as if you can do it for free.

 

Celebrian´s Stone is also unique besides being restricted. Want to be sure to get it during the game then put 3 copies in and the two remaining are discard fodder.

 

All cards have their strong points and their weak points but Favor of the Lady is not just a "bad card".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Power in the Earth would be infinitely more useful if it bounced to your hand when it is discarded.

Edited by Ohnomycocoa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To limit the Outlands : Each Outlands gain : limit 2 per deck

To limit the Doomed cards : Each Doomed cards gain : limit one per deck

 

Like this :

 

Dwalin: After Dwalin attacks and destroys an enemy, lower your threat by 1.

 

 

Glorfindel (Spirit)

 

change his ability to: 

 

Forced: After Glorfindel exhausts, raise your threat by 1.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Power in the Earth would be infinitely more useful if it bounced to your hand when it is discarded.

Or even better: When attached location leaves play as an explored location, attach Power in Earth to another location in staging area, if able.

Ohnomycocoa and Mndela like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keeping Count:

 

I would add a response suggested by many people in the past, that when you play a copy of Keeping Count, you could search your deck for another copy and add it to your hand. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Glorfindel (lore): Remove "once per round".

 

He cost A LOT, so his ability should be worth to put on the table, like Elrond. Maybe this help (probable not).

 

Bilbo: Draws 1 additional card in the resource phase.

 

When I play him, I am the person that want to draw more! This is personal taste.

 

Mirlond: Each hero you control gets -1 threat cost.

 

So she can see more play. Another personal taste.

 

Pippin (spirit): Remove "If each hero you control has the Hobbit trait, Pippin gains:"

 

Pippin lore is so much better and this requirement make him too much specialized to hobbit decks. I would also change his name to some less know hobbit, so he can pair up with the other Pippin and increase the hobbit deck possibilities. If you also make that the enemy can't engage anymore (like some people wrongly think him works), he would be a REALLY good deck for some decks and see more play. Maybe making Dunhere decks more viable against harder quests.

 

Glorfindel:  second that.  Remove the once per round limit.  He'd be worth using.  With Elrond, he's not worthless, but that combo puts you at 25 threat before adding another hero... not good.

 

Bilbo:  During the resource phase, perhaps choose a player to draw 1 card.

 

Mirlonde:  perhaps -1 threat for each LoreSilvan or Noldor hero you control.  Is that too complicated?

 

Pippin: good suggestion.  He needs help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Keeping Count:

 

I would add a response suggested by many people in the past, that when you play a copy of Keeping Count, you could search your deck for another copy and add it to your hand. 

 

If some players have keeping count in his deck sure there are 2 KC in play in first rounds, and they can get stronger...

Edited by Mndela

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Mirlonde:  perhaps -1 threat for each LoreSilvan or Noldor hero you control.  Is that too complicated?

 

 

I remember that time when I suggested that it would be nice for Mirlonde to reduce not just lore threat, but silvan threat too, I got jumped at by booored who accused me in "wanting to have an overpowered silvan deck and overall easy game"  :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Mirlonde:  perhaps -1 threat for each LoreSilvan or Noldor hero you control.  Is that too complicated?

 

 

I remember that time when I suggested that it would be nice for Mirlonde to reduce not just lore threat, but silvan threat too, I got jumped at by booored who accused me in "wanting to have an overpowered silvan deck and overall easy game"  :lol:

 

 

The very thought of troll-on-troll violence makes this bear shed a single, giant, honey-scented tear.

 

Incidentally, I agree that Mirlonde would be better if her ability applied to Silvan heroes rather than Lore heroes. I understand that the AtS cycle was trying to encourage mono-sphere decks (with mixed results), but I think encouraging multi-sphere Silvan decks would be a lot more interesting for this hero. Oh well, instead she will be relegated to a few Lore-heavy decks. I do hope that the Silvan archetype has room for her, but with more Silvan heroes on the way, I have my doubts.

Aaron Youngren likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0