Battlescribe is not nearly as good as Legion List builder imo. It has no pictures, it's just walls of text and it isn't very clean. You have to really know legion to use battlescribe as it doesn't give you descriptions of any upgrades. You just have to know them...the only thing battlescribe has over list builder is that it's updated. 

If anyone actually wants to play as the First Order. You can download them here. 

https://cleverclanker.video.blog/2019/11/28/rise-of-the-first-order/

Kylo, Phasma, Hux, Bazine Netal, a bunch of trooper upgrades. It's all here. 

This debate has occurred several times on this and other forums about the ethics of 3D printing miniatures for games.
My opinion is that Skullforge, Mel's, Buckethead bits etc. are harmless becuase they are not selling complete experiences (no cards or rules associated with them), just miniatures that enhance a game. I own a few Skullforge minis and they don't replace purchases, in fact they usually inspire me to buy more official product. Disney also seems to think so becuase they have not cracked down on them.
Even if they release the bad batch down the road, you would still need to purchase a box to get the cards. And the models will be straight up higher quality and detail in hard plastic with pose options.

Wait, you think both Grievous and Dooku have a lot of plot armor, but a 6-minute long boring scene of Mace Windu destroying probably 10% of all B2s ever created BY HIMSELF is ok?!?
Lol.
 
That Grievous is MILES better than RotS/Clone Wars series. I wish Lucas never forced his change.

Umm...Iden seems.....REALLY STRONG....
I'm concerned....

You can't, but he'll do it anyway.

It is surely pure coincidence that nobody has ever won a major tournament with a list including a unit that has been available for the entire lifetime of the game. 

you mean high level tournament data like this:
https://legiontournamentcircuit.com/tournament-data-2019/

I went through the first 20 rebel lists that won tournaments, not a single T-47 among them, there were a couple land speeders even, but zero T-47's

I'm sure if I were to continue the fruitless task of going through many more rebel winning lists I would find few, but likely 0 T-47's.

If this isn't enough evidence of the T-47's lacklustre performance then nothing will be enough for your unrealistic expectations of evidence that its not bad. 

At this point it's a fact, as much a fact as the T-47 is not viable in the current meta

While I can agree on his point that unit not being used dosen't mean it's automaticly bad as there are other variables and such.
However he is a know troll on these forums, just so you know.

All I see in this thread is @Derrault knocking down literally any changes people suggest without making any of his own. He is defending the Airspeeder 100%, but doesn't seem to realize this unit is NEVER used. So, how about instead of knocking everyone's suggestions, you make an actual suggestion of how to get the Airspeeder more competitive play. Note: Saying "players shouldn't fly it into range of their opponent's entire army on turn 1 or 2" isn't a suggestion. 

So I am looking forward to hearing how YOU would make changes, not to the rulebook, not to other units, not to a keyword, but to the airspeeder so it actually sees competitive play. 

All I see in this thread is @Derrault knocking down literally any changes people suggest without making any of his own. He is defending the Airspeeder 100%, but doesn't seem to realize this unit is NEVER used. So, how about instead of knocking everyone's suggestions, you make an actual suggestion of how to get the Airspeeder more competitive play. Note: Saying "players shouldn't fly it into range of their opponent's entire army on turn 1 or 2" isn't a suggestion. 

So I am looking forward to hearing how YOU would make changes, not to the rulebook, not to other units, not to a keyword, but to the airspeeder so it actually sees competitive play. 

All I see in this thread is @Derrault knocking down literally any changes people suggest without making any of his own. He is defending the Airspeeder 100%, but doesn't seem to realize this unit is NEVER used. So, how about instead of knocking everyone's suggestions, you make an actual suggestion of how to get the Airspeeder more competitive play. Note: Saying "players shouldn't fly it into range of their opponent's entire army on turn 1 or 2" isn't a suggestion. 

So I am looking forward to hearing how YOU would make changes, not to the rulebook, not to other units, not to a keyword, but to the airspeeder so it actually sees competitive play. 

All I see in this thread is @Derrault knocking down literally any changes people suggest without making any of his own. He is defending the Airspeeder 100%, but doesn't seem to realize this unit is NEVER used. So, how about instead of knocking everyone's suggestions, you make an actual suggestion of how to get the Airspeeder more competitive play. Note: Saying "players shouldn't fly it into range of their opponent's entire army on turn 1 or 2" isn't a suggestion. 

So I am looking forward to hearing how YOU would make changes, not to the rulebook, not to other units, not to a keyword, but to the airspeeder so it actually sees competitive play. 

All I see in this thread is @Derrault knocking down literally any changes people suggest without making any of his own. He is defending the Airspeeder 100%, but doesn't seem to realize this unit is NEVER used. So, how about instead of knocking everyone's suggestions, you make an actual suggestion of how to get the Airspeeder more competitive play. Note: Saying "players shouldn't fly it into range of their opponent's entire army on turn 1 or 2" isn't a suggestion. 

So I am looking forward to hearing how YOU would make changes, not to the rulebook, not to other units, not to a keyword, but to the airspeeder so it actually sees competitive play. 

Salacious B. Crumb

By that "logic", no Legion game is legit since the dice are not created equally and will favor one side over another.

Battlescribe is not nearly as good as Legion List builder imo. It has no pictures, it's just walls of text and it isn't very clean. You have to really know legion to use battlescribe as it doesn't give you descriptions of any upgrades. You just have to know them...the only thing battlescribe has over list builder is that it's updated. 

Battlescribe is not nearly as good as Legion List builder imo. It has no pictures, it's just walls of text and it isn't very clean. You have to really know legion to use battlescribe as it doesn't give you descriptions of any upgrades. You just have to know them...the only thing battlescribe has over list builder is that it's updated. 

Battlescribe is not nearly as good as Legion List builder imo. It has no pictures, it's just walls of text and it isn't very clean. You have to really know legion to use battlescribe as it doesn't give you descriptions of any upgrades. You just have to know them...the only thing battlescribe has over list builder is that it's updated. 

Anyone connected to the Legion Army List Builder iOS app? 
 
I’ve been using it since getting into the game and really like it. However, I can’t find any recent discussion about it other than the announcement of its release back in 2018. Wondering what it’s status is and it’s future? Though it was odd that Google couldn’t find anything recent about it. 

I find it amazing that people STILL think the leak might be fake...after all the confirmed releases for GAR and CIS, Alex Day confirming Wren and Inferno...people still wanna pretend the rest of them won't be released...*eye roll*

I find it amazing that people STILL think the leak might be fake...after all the confirmed releases for GAR and CIS, Alex Day confirming Wren and Inferno...people still wanna pretend the rest of them won't be released...*eye roll*

I find it amazing that people STILL think the leak might be fake...after all the confirmed releases for GAR and CIS, Alex Day confirming Wren and Inferno...people still wanna pretend the rest of them won't be released...*eye roll*

Hopefully quality on the mini will also be improved. While painting the rebel AT-RT I noticed some differences from reference material. I assume it was done to make it more structurally sound. On that note, was the Rebel version hard plastic?? 

I'm also going to guess the Republic version will have Armor X instead of Armor because I think it's a bit OP