Jump to content

Piratical Moustache

Members
  • Content Count

    754
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Piratical Moustache

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 02/21/1994

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I figured that it was simply an Arquitens with heavy modifications but where did wookieepedia get the name "546 cruiser"? Even if it's just a refit we still could still get some Armada content out of it, a unique title or ship card perhaps.
  2. https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Class_546_Cruiser Interesting that Moff Gideon's light cruiser is a new class of ship rather than a heavily modified Arquitens, what are the chances the 546 cruiser becomes a light carrier expansion? I could see a younger Gideon officer/commander card and a dark trooper boarding team bundled with the ship.
  3. Do you mean putting modification on LTTs or removing modification from DTTs?
  4. I don't understand why FFG didn't significantly change the card with the new rebalancing of the game since Linked Turbolaser Towers essentially is what DTTs should've been, so what would you do with the card? If you make DTTs simply add an extra red die then you made better Slaved Turrets so that isn't the solution, but LTTs are the red reroll option so that's not the answer either.
  5. Notice how the Arquitens has an extra set of 4 engines, makes the ship more like a Star Destroyer in appearance.
  6. There's a lot of changes to think about, but one thing that I've noticed is that FFG seems to want tokens to be a critical feature instead of a supporting element to the game. I don't really like that black dice brawlers got hit hard by the changes.
  7. I'm in favor of reworking the combat refit as a Star Destroyer, because right now the combat refit is practically unusable.
×
×
  • Create New...