Jump to content

Togashi Gao Shan

Members
  • Content Count

    554
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Togashi Gao Shan

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    Northwest PA

Recent Profile Visitors

830 profile views
  1. I'm still waiting for the 'miner' cycle: Dopey, Sneezy, Bashful, Grumpy, Happy, Sleepy, and Doc.
  2. Togashi Mendicant is neither card advantage, nor a good card. In any case, this video does have good production values, even if they are off-base on a lot of their statements.
  3. "Hi, I'm Yasuki Vincento. I do business!" "...you are clearly three Nezumi in a trench coat, standing on each other's shoulders."
  4. The 1 cost Dragon monk is weird. His ability will rarely be very useful. He makes High Kick slightly better, though still probably only worth running 1 or 2 at most.
  5. The Steadfast Witch Hunter is wearing the facepaint. Maybe only the tsukai-sagasu (witch hunters) wear it this time, or maybe it's just an error / inconsistency in the management of the art selection.
  6. The 1 cost Dragon monk is decent. Conditional ability that will occasionally be very useful. It also makes High Kick more useful, though still probably only worth running 1 or 2 at most.
  7. I'm glad you like the art. The card really is kinda poop, though.
  8. Yeah. I feel Dragon really need a good 3 cost monk, and probably a good 5 cost monk as well. We currently have only one 3 cost monk, and she's a conflict character. This new Phoenix monk is excellent, and continues the trend of them getting the types of mechanics I wish Dragon had
  9. The tattoo us interesting. I'm still not sold on Agasha Sumiko. Id rather have Yokuni most of the time, and our 5 cost could / should have been a known iconic character, like Mitsu or Hitomi.
  10. Hey, man, I play Dragon the great majority of the time. I think they need less clunky and / or less easily shut down mechanical themes. However, I mostly disagree with your assessment of this hypothetical card. It probably needs a "once per conflict" cap, and maybe a 1-fate cost, but otherwise it's fine. The worst that happens is that your opponent bows one of their characters opposing you and sends them home, and you choose not to do the same, so they gain 2 honor and you lose 1. Powerful effect, yes, but it has a cost and it's effects can be cancelled.
  11. Eh...Dragon is getting some rather "iffy, at best" cards in this cycle. Itinerant Philosopher is just...not good. The Enigmatic Magistrate is probably going to be far too unreliable to make up for his crappy stats.
  12. Yeah, it was one of the first things I thought of. Beautifully eeevil. I've pulled it off twice in a Crab-splashing-Phoenix deck. It's a good thing it requires two clans for anyone else to splash. It would be busted if Dragon could use both these cards.
  13. I've heard that the deluxe sets will simply be pure single-can based, starting with Phoenix. I hope not, as I feel that's an absolutely terrible way to go.
  14. To be fair, I keep hearing about a lot of botched supposed rulings by the judge(s) there. If the reports are accurate, the judging has been terrible, with several completely incorrect rulings made. That said., it's at least partially FFG's fault that it's been difficult to have consistent rulings.
×
×
  • Create New...