Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Andreu

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

765 profile views
  1. I'm positive we will get the AAT. Is truly emblematic so it will be the AT-ST equivalent to CIS. I believe is even doable in a large base but it could come with its own base variant similar to what they are doing with the Occupier Tank.
  2. I thought so too but after some digging I found out it wasn't the case. It's a different ship... you can see the concept for that one really well in the art book of the movie.
  3. I have a doubt maybe someone can think with me a bit here. So in this expansion there is no personel slot but we can add a named/unique leader DT-F16 with its own miniature that takes the slot of the heavy weapon trooper (the DLT-19D troooper). Therefore any aditional unit we buy after the first one will give us a extra mini to fool around (since we cannot field more than one DT-F16), right? This got me curious which one of the minis is that one and wich one is the basic leader? There is one holding with both hands a SE-14r that stands out but the rest are pretty similar. I'm thinking the SE-14r is DT-F16 and from the normal ones the one with one hand in the air is the basic leader.
  4. I think that astromech repairing speeders make sense only if they are on board... or as in another topic is being discussed, if a "break mechanic" allows a stop (meaning skiping mandatory move). Otherwise it makes no sense right? I know wargames aren't simulations but a minimum of logic needs to stay in place.
  5. Gaslands spins also around that and it's a pretty rad and fun game!
  6. I agree with you but that is a inconvenience of the current movement system for the sake of simple/agile gameplay. But in my coment I wasn't underestimating it's speed, I was only conveying that it is a mechanic that could be implemented only for speeder units with speed 2 (or all of them but way harder for speed 3 ones) representing that something that goes faster can't break easily. Only an idea though, I don't dislike the current mandatory movement mechanic tbh.
  7. I like this Idea. I think it should be part of the "speeder" rules in a way that the T-47 Airspeeder and 74-Z Speederbikes need a higher cost or they cannot even do it (and there is no need to errata the cards). So linking the mechanic to the speed will be ideal... not sure how but in a way that the new speeder can do it easily since is only speed 2.
  8. Maybe we should stop pouring money to their products in the side that doesn't matter... protest with something they will listen to.
  9. I'm with you there, never bought one cause I hate the ship looks... in the other hand I bought ships I don't fly just cause of the looks. Alien luxury has different versions with different amount of cannons, the proportions are not great but the model is inspired in the other E-Wing version wich I like much better... I wish FFG reprinted the 2nd edition version with that version.
  10. I'm happy for those who can get their hands on the exclusive Vader but I'm on the side of this is not a good move and is gonna bring more losses than benefits. For example, completionists dont have a reason anymore to buy everything since they cannot complete the collection anyway.
  11. What does the K2-84 "Solitary" keyword means? I never seen it before so I'm confused.
  12. There is still time for FFG to release a Ace pilot for the A-Wing, along with the 2.0 rerelease.
  13. Please FFG let this man know he is free to make Legion and X-Wing terrain tutorials!
  14. 2003 CW outfit is the best, has the coolest part of the jedi outfit and manages to remove the wide arm sleeves that look too "70s"... Gauntlets are rad and make it more star warsy IMO.
  • Create New...