Jump to content

MenaceNsobriety

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    463

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MenaceNsobriety

  4. Posted

    18 minutes ago, Admiral Deathrain said:

    Michael is the guy who got screwed over in the cheating incident, I'll put that into my posts in which I am not talking directly about the incident until FFG does something apropriate to apologize to him, because that aspect of the whole thing is what makes me really angry.

    Shouldn't the swiss games be running already? I sure hope GSP gets to stream today, they were truly amazing through the event.

    Oh gotcha. Yeah you are right about that. Where did he end up finishing?

  5. Posted

    1 hour ago, Admiral Deathrain said:

    On FFGs official Twitch channel there is a schedule. No idea if pirate radio streams will also happen (I'd love them to, because Gold Squadron Radios was really good). Probably not?

     

    Furthermore, I believe that Michael should be compensated by FFG.

    I know Gold Squad is streaming the 2 games of Swiss but they are not sure of anything more. I don't know who Michael is but Dion and the crew should definitely be taken care of for all their fantastic coverage so far.

  12. Posted

    It is mostly about disrupting bomb drops but would have uses like shutting down Jyn crew and Gonk. As to the Conner net thing the bombing player would have to position really well to net you while outside range 1 so that is not a bad thing. I personally play mostly Rebels but I still want imperial aces to be viable because it is a fun guessing game of maneuvers when playing against them. Bombs and Imperial aces both sit on that knife edge where if you change even something small you make them either terrible or OP. This way you can leave bombs as is but give the thing they kicked out of the competitive scene some tools to fight them with.

  13. Posted

    I thought of a way to bring back Imperial arc dodgers and wanted some opinions. Bombs really ruin an Aces day so why not give them something that can help protect against Clusters and Conners.

    Experimental Disruptor. Unique. Modification. 1 point. Empire only. Small ship only.

    "Enemy ships at range 1 cannot perform actions listed on upgrade cards. You may equip an additional Modifcation."

     

    I thought about limiting it to ships with 2 or fewer shields because of defenders but don't really think that is necessary. This would be a great way to get Imp aces back on the table but since you can only have one you can't run multiple aces without fear of bombs. Vader and Fel would certainly love this. Plus you can still hit bombs but it's going to take a LOT more skill to place them where you can't avoid them. What do you think? Would this be enough to bring the evil empire up to the current power level?

  14. Posted

    Just now, RufusDaMan said:

    Vader needs that tax. Else he would be broken.

    No because in my scenario he doesn't get ATC. You would have to choose offense or defense when equipping a title.

  17. Posted

    21 minutes ago, Elrodthealbino said:

    Both ion cannons and turrets use three dice. That is about as good as can bgee expected. Any more would be too much. I almost think that people forget it does damage too, so they write it off.

    If anything about ion would be buffed, it would be the two ion requirement for large bases.

    ICT is just to over costed for what you get. 3 attack out of arc will have a very hard time against anything with Autothursters. For 1 more point you can get TLT and that is the real issue with ICT. TLT is just better by such a large margin it pushes ICT out.

  18. Posted

    3 hours ago, FTS Gecko said:

    "After performing a SLAM action, if you did not overlap ab obstacle or ship you may perform one free action from your action bar.

    Then receive one stress token."

    I bet you like playing Imperial arc dodgers right? Your nerf would kill bombs as a viable option. What would Advanced Slam even be good for if you can't use it to drop a bomb? If a change is necessary then the stress part is plenty. I already suggested that change in another thread a few weeks ago.

  19. Posted

    4 minutes ago, Elrodthealbino said:

    Awwwww. Were the Kwings mean to you?

     

    All joking aside, many of the problems people are having with Kwings and Attani can be easily countered with ion. Have fun slamming a 1 kiddo!

    Ion has been around since wave 1, and been useful the whole time, but I guess it isn't sexy enough?

    I keep telling everyone who complains about K-wings to use Ion control. IMO Ion turret needs a buff to complete with TLT. If ICT were a better option than K's would have a natural counter. As it is something with ICT beats K's but loses to almost everything else because it can't hit most ships reliably.

    Scopes reacted to this
×
×
  • Create New...