Jump to content

sionnach19

Members
  • Content Count

    166
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from Mikael Hasselstein in has there been any hint at future expansions?   
    I don't think an expansion would be able to really handle a whole new era -- I think it would require a whole new game, maybe using the basic rules of Rebellion. If anything, I think the Clone Wars would be a better starting place than the sequel trilogy... probably involving more military combat, but the same general idea of the Republic searching for the Separatist base.
     
    The only "hint" I could see of a possible future expansion is the total exclusion of characters/art from Rebels in the RotE expansion. FFG has a ton of art for Rebels characters from their other games, and it seems strange to me none of it made it into the expansion. Especially for the Empire leaders -- why include Motti and "Krennic's Finest", instead of someone like Grand Admiral Thrawn? That leads me to think that they're saving their assets for a potential second expansion that focuses mainly on Rebels. Not to say it's a sure thing, but if they wanted to do another expansion Rebels would have them covered.
     
    We could see Thrawn, Kallus, Pryce, and the Grand Inquisitor for the villain leaders, and there are tons of options for the heroes (Hera, Ahsoka, Ezra, and Sato are my bet). I'm not sure what new units they could (or should) add, so I think I'd rather see them introduce a new game board instead. There's lots of potential in a new gameboard... introduce some new planets, alternative travel pathways, different resource values, etc. I'd be really interested in a smaller game board that lowered the average game length to under two hours -- it could obviously be balanced with a new probe deck, a new victory tracker (the Empire has less time to find the Rebel base), and a new initial deployment (no starting Death Star!).
     
     
  2. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from HirumaShigure in What do we think this will be?   
    I had the same initial reaction, but then realized how maligned the ally mechanic is in Imperial Assault (and how many forum/Reddit threads come from people asking if they can just play as the heroes of the trilogy instead of the "made up" characters). I think we'll see a mix of both... the second from left character looks like Beravor, the Dunedain hero from the LotR:LCG Core Set. I bet the initial campaign (and those following it) will take place between the events of the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings, so Bilbo makes sense as a Hobbit hero who already has some adventuring experience under his belt.
  3. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from GILLIES291 in Help with Pelennor Fields solo?   
    Thanks for the replies! I was able to make it through with Eowyn (tactics), Eomer (leadership), and Arwen. Tactically, I realized it was better to use Eowyn’s ability early on to kill the Wraith on Wings instead of saving it for the Witch-King fight. I also focused on gaming the second stage (the siege at Osgiliath) to give me more time to set up board state and buy Aragorn some time to show up. This took some doing — I needed an ally with a reasonable health pool, and favorable encounter card draws. Too many locations makes it easier to stall that stage, but led to me becoming location locked later on — I had to hit the right balance where I could clear locations and enemies as they appeared (it also helped that Gandalf was my discarded ally, which bought me plenty of time). Pushing through Stage 3 wasn’t too bad — Leadership Eomer’s ability helped thin out the Witch-King’s reinforcements, and Aragorn with Anduril was perfect for cutting down Orcs. One hitting Stage 5, I dropped two Mumakil and a Haradrim soldier — alongside the Witch-King, I was worried that I would get overwhelmed. Managed to cut down the Witch-King in two turns, and I ignored the Mumakil while using Banner of Elendil and Faramir to juice my questing capabilities. It was very close, but I’m happy to move onto the final expansion for the Saga!
  4. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from Authraw in Help with Pelennor Fields solo?   
    Thanks for the replies! I was able to make it through with Eowyn (tactics), Eomer (leadership), and Arwen. Tactically, I realized it was better to use Eowyn’s ability early on to kill the Wraith on Wings instead of saving it for the Witch-King fight. I also focused on gaming the second stage (the siege at Osgiliath) to give me more time to set up board state and buy Aragorn some time to show up. This took some doing — I needed an ally with a reasonable health pool, and favorable encounter card draws. Too many locations makes it easier to stall that stage, but led to me becoming location locked later on — I had to hit the right balance where I could clear locations and enemies as they appeared (it also helped that Gandalf was my discarded ally, which bought me plenty of time). Pushing through Stage 3 wasn’t too bad — Leadership Eomer’s ability helped thin out the Witch-King’s reinforcements, and Aragorn with Anduril was perfect for cutting down Orcs. One hitting Stage 5, I dropped two Mumakil and a Haradrim soldier — alongside the Witch-King, I was worried that I would get overwhelmed. Managed to cut down the Witch-King in two turns, and I ignored the Mumakil while using Banner of Elendil and Faramir to juice my questing capabilities. It was very close, but I’m happy to move onto the final expansion for the Saga!
  5. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from daveb_33 in Who are the base game heroes?   
    The second character from the left looks like Beravor, a female Dunedain ranger from the LotR:LCG Core Set. Character on the right looks more like Eowyn at first glance to me, but that might be an elf ear poking out -- which would make more sense for Arwen (and next to Legolas, the other elf). In that case, Aragorn is likely the guy on the far left -- either him or Halbarad (who is dual wielding in his LotR:LCG art). Chances are this game is dove-tailing with the digital version of the card game, so I'd expect to see a lot of overlap between those two releases (Aragorn, Gimli, Bilbo, Arwen, Eowyn, and Legolas all make sense from that perspective).
    Bilbo makes sense as they're likely aiming to explore events that occur between the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings. While the timeline will never match-up exactly, it creates opportunities to include a lot of named characters from both the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings trilogy without wading into recreating the events of the main stories. I hope to see Gandalf included at some point, but he might be a little too "powerful" to make sense as a player character. He might also be the way to tempt players into purchasing inevitable expansions...
  6. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from subtrendy2 in What's the deal with Drokkatta?   
    Another aspect of what makes Drokkatta strong is how flexible she can be with distributing damage. Her rubble token is a way to get the one damage you need to finish off a wounded figure without wasting an activation. The flexibility of her attacks (focusing/expanding blast damage, generating more surges) often allows her to do exactly what is necessary to finish off wounded figures, which works well with her class’s broad focus on splash damage that often leaves wounded figures.
    Additionally, I think she’s incredibly self-sufficient. Her upgrades mean that she isn’t relying on purchasing optimal weapons from the item pool, or that she depends on good support to help her manage strain/unlock the most of her abilities.
  7. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from Blademaster72 in Best talent upgrade on Boba?   
    I’ve really liked Debris Gambit. It’s so cheap and easy to trigger that white Evade, so inevitably it winds up pulling some weight over the course of a few games. Boba can generate enough mods on his own right now that he is one of the few pilots who has the freedom to Evade as his regular action.
  8. Like
    sionnach19 reacted to Cuz05 in Darth Vader once flew a TIE/D....   
    I'd fly him with Supernatural, Prockets, FCS, HLC and a 61pt bid. 
    Watch everything burn.
  9. Like
    sionnach19 reacted to TheEldarGuy in Wave 12 Wishlist   
    Wouldn't a sniper have 2 Blue dice?
    As an idea: remove the Surge Pierce (or swap it for a Boom or 2 Boom), reduce the Health to 4. That way if you make it a 2 model squad, the other is a Spotter with a Green-yellow Blaster. 
    For the Scout, if the Spotter takes a Double Action and is within 3 spaces of the Sniper, the Sniper gains pierce 2 (or 3), a Spotter action could be to throw a Focus on the Sniper within 3 spaces.
  10. Like
    sionnach19 reacted to Majushi in Wave 12 Wishlist   
    The Auto +2 Accuracy is basically better than switching the Green to a Blue. And the Green is better than Blue on everything except Range. I'd leave it as is.
    Blast isn't really thematic for a Sniper, but Pierce is. I'd leave that one as is too.
    I'd agree that a 2 unit squad would make sense. Health 4 or even 3 (look at Jet Troopers as an example)
    It's pretty hard to make a Spotter and Sniper on the same card. Easiest is to make them both Snipers, and give them an action similar to the ISB Infiltrators. Usable only once by the group that round. So they can spot/shoot or the other way around.
  11. Like
    sionnach19 reacted to Bitterman in Wave 12 Wishlist   
    Top tip: use the <skill> tag instead of <b> for the ability names. So, "<skill>Take Aim:</skill>" and "<action> <skill>Prowl:</skill>", for example.
  12. Like
    sionnach19 reacted to a1bert in Wave 12 Wishlist   
    Wording suggestion:
    Take Aim: At the start of your activation you may become focused. If you do, you cannot voluntarily exit your space during this activation.
     
     
  13. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from Mandalore of the Rings in Wave 12 Wishlist   
    These are the rough draft of the terrain rules I've been working on. You could certainly add more layers to make them a little more interesting, but (especially for fan content!) I wanted to keep things simple. I think these broad rules are enough to capture the benefits/dangers of different types of terrain, though I do like the way @subtrendy2 builds skill checks into the terrain types. I would suggest that the bleeding condition is the perfect stand in for a burning effect!
    Anyways...
    _____________
    Hazardous Terrain:  Hazardous terrain is represented by a solid orange line surrounding a space on the map. Line of sight can be traced through hazardous terrain. When a figure enters a hazardous terrain space, roll one yellow die. That figure suffers damage equal to the number of damage symbols showing. Once per activation. Mobile figures ignore hazardous terrain during their activation.
    Fortified Terrain: Fortified terrain is represented by a solid purple line surrounding a space on the map. Line of sight can be traced through fortified terrain. When a ranged attack is declared against a small figure on a fortified terrain space, the defender may add one block to the defense results. Once per activation.
    Trap Token: A space containing a trap is considered to be hazardous terrain, in addition to its other terrain types. After a figure enters a space containing a trap, discard the trap token.
    Fortification Token: A space containing a fortification is considered to be fortified terrain, in addition to its other terrain types. After an attack is resolved in which the defender added one block to the defense results, discard the fortification token.
    *Addendum to Massive Figures: Massive figures ignore the effects of hazardous terrain.
    _____________
    Hazardous terrain can represent lava, a chemical spill, hostile flora, etc. Certain figures and abilities can place trap tokens onto the map, simulating the effect of hazardous terrain. I didn't want it to be too punishing, in a way where it could distort missions or skirmish maps, so the damage received is pretty mild. In terms of trap tokens, it takes a concerted effort to fully block a section of the map... but they can also be placed in strategic areas (desirable firing points, for instance). I wanted to limit the roll to once per activation, to prevent abuse but still allow opponents to push/pull each other into hazardous terrain to deal damage.
    Fortified terrain can represent hastily constructed foxholes, entrenched bunkers, energy shields, or camouflaged cover. The bonus here feels a little stronger, but again the once per turn limit (hopefully) prevents it from distorting game balance. These are a little easier to take advantage of, but as the conflict moves the other side may be able to take advantage of the fortifications you were hunkered in earlier!
    One of the heroes I'm kicking around is a Sullustan engineer, and his big shtick is battlefield manipulation (placing lots of trap and fortification tokens). My thought is that his upgrades will further buff these tokens... for instance, he can suffer a strain to prevent a fortification token from being discarded, or force enemies to roll a red dice when entering a space with a trap token. I tried to build these abilities into the allies and enemies, as well (see the mock up card for the Scout Sniper... though I have no idea if he's balanced overall!).
     

     
  14. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from subtrendy2 in Wave 12 Wishlist   
    These are the rough draft of the terrain rules I've been working on. You could certainly add more layers to make them a little more interesting, but (especially for fan content!) I wanted to keep things simple. I think these broad rules are enough to capture the benefits/dangers of different types of terrain, though I do like the way @subtrendy2 builds skill checks into the terrain types. I would suggest that the bleeding condition is the perfect stand in for a burning effect!
    Anyways...
    _____________
    Hazardous Terrain:  Hazardous terrain is represented by a solid orange line surrounding a space on the map. Line of sight can be traced through hazardous terrain. When a figure enters a hazardous terrain space, roll one yellow die. That figure suffers damage equal to the number of damage symbols showing. Once per activation. Mobile figures ignore hazardous terrain during their activation.
    Fortified Terrain: Fortified terrain is represented by a solid purple line surrounding a space on the map. Line of sight can be traced through fortified terrain. When a ranged attack is declared against a small figure on a fortified terrain space, the defender may add one block to the defense results. Once per activation.
    Trap Token: A space containing a trap is considered to be hazardous terrain, in addition to its other terrain types. After a figure enters a space containing a trap, discard the trap token.
    Fortification Token: A space containing a fortification is considered to be fortified terrain, in addition to its other terrain types. After an attack is resolved in which the defender added one block to the defense results, discard the fortification token.
    *Addendum to Massive Figures: Massive figures ignore the effects of hazardous terrain.
    _____________
    Hazardous terrain can represent lava, a chemical spill, hostile flora, etc. Certain figures and abilities can place trap tokens onto the map, simulating the effect of hazardous terrain. I didn't want it to be too punishing, in a way where it could distort missions or skirmish maps, so the damage received is pretty mild. In terms of trap tokens, it takes a concerted effort to fully block a section of the map... but they can also be placed in strategic areas (desirable firing points, for instance). I wanted to limit the roll to once per activation, to prevent abuse but still allow opponents to push/pull each other into hazardous terrain to deal damage.
    Fortified terrain can represent hastily constructed foxholes, entrenched bunkers, energy shields, or camouflaged cover. The bonus here feels a little stronger, but again the once per turn limit (hopefully) prevents it from distorting game balance. These are a little easier to take advantage of, but as the conflict moves the other side may be able to take advantage of the fortifications you were hunkered in earlier!
    One of the heroes I'm kicking around is a Sullustan engineer, and his big shtick is battlefield manipulation (placing lots of trap and fortification tokens). My thought is that his upgrades will further buff these tokens... for instance, he can suffer a strain to prevent a fortification token from being discarded, or force enemies to roll a red dice when entering a space with a trap token. I tried to build these abilities into the allies and enemies, as well (see the mock up card for the Scout Sniper... though I have no idea if he's balanced overall!).
     

     
  15. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from subtrendy2 in Wave 12 Wishlist   
    I'm also a fan of new terrain types (the two I have in mind are "hazardous", which can cause damage, and "fortified", which grants a very slight defensive bonus to figures standing on that space), and more abilities to interact with terrain in general. I also like the idea of more deployable companions, similar to the Ugnaught junk droid (though preferably, not broken). If I worked at FFG, I'd include these concepts in a new campaign box that focused on volcanic environments (Sullust, Mustafar, post-DS-Jedha, Shu-Torun, etc.). Include a Sullustan engineer hero, whose big shtick is fortifying spaces and can place a stationary blaster turret that has a similar overwatch/quick draw function as Jyn.
  16. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from Mandalore of the Rings in Wave 12 Wishlist   
    I'm also a fan of new terrain types (the two I have in mind are "hazardous", which can cause damage, and "fortified", which grants a very slight defensive bonus to figures standing on that space), and more abilities to interact with terrain in general. I also like the idea of more deployable companions, similar to the Ugnaught junk droid (though preferably, not broken). If I worked at FFG, I'd include these concepts in a new campaign box that focused on volcanic environments (Sullust, Mustafar, post-DS-Jedha, Shu-Torun, etc.). Include a Sullustan engineer hero, whose big shtick is fortifying spaces and can place a stationary blaster turret that has a similar overwatch/quick draw function as Jyn.
  17. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from angelman2 in Wave 12 Wishlist   
    I'm also a fan of new terrain types (the two I have in mind are "hazardous", which can cause damage, and "fortified", which grants a very slight defensive bonus to figures standing on that space), and more abilities to interact with terrain in general. I also like the idea of more deployable companions, similar to the Ugnaught junk droid (though preferably, not broken). If I worked at FFG, I'd include these concepts in a new campaign box that focused on volcanic environments (Sullust, Mustafar, post-DS-Jedha, Shu-Torun, etc.). Include a Sullustan engineer hero, whose big shtick is fortifying spaces and can place a stationary blaster turret that has a similar overwatch/quick draw function as Jyn.
  18. Like
    sionnach19 reacted to Archangelspiv in The curious case of Boba Fett   
    It might also be that people love the Firespray but it was garbage at the end of 1.0, even way before the end and people are flying it again. I know i fall into this category. 
  19. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from agenttherock in The curious case of Boba Fett   
    I think Boba is strong, but I’m not sure he is so powerful as to be distorting the game balance. I think some folks are particularly bothered by Boba because of the way his passive ability combines with his ability to generate a big token stack (1.0 PTSD); but I haven’t found that it makes him duly unkillable or incredibly dangerous. I’m happy Boba is strong right now, and I think any changes should be slight and focus primarily on addressing the extra tokens he generates through Han Gunner.
    It seems FFG is committed to adjusting points and slots as its primary means of balancing. So, ignoring possible FAQ’s or card text changes, what could make a real difference? Boba could lose access to the Title, but that would prevent him from taking his own ship’s Title, so that seems unlikely. Points could go up, but this is a tricky issue... this combination is dependent on a Title, a Gunner, a Crew, and a pilot. Where do you increase the points? Adjusting the upgrade cards impacts their ability to function for other ships/builds. Adjusting Boba makes him weaker with alternative builds, harming his overall viability.
    It seems the most restrained way to address this would be a small, incremental point increase on the different components of the build to make the overall combination more expensive. Marauder goes up by 2, Han goes up by 4-6, Boba goes up by 2-4, and you’ve added 10 points to Boba’s base cost. I’m still a little skeptical about this — it doesn’t impact Boba/Guri, besides diminishing the bid. But it does limit Boba’s partners in a 3+ ship build, and the Firespray simply isn’t durable enough to justify such a large investment. But anything more drastic risks hurting Boba’s overall viability, or breaking parts of the combination that would impact other lists. Targeting Marauder or Han Gunner with an even bigger points jump might further encourage folks to explore alternative builds for Boba.
  20. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from Greedo_Sharpshooter in Looking for fearless and inventive scum pilots to support Boba/Marauder/Han   
    I lean towards 4-LOM for a bunch of reasons. Old Teroch's shtick overlaps with Palob's, which can lean to diminishing returns. Teroch also needs to expose himself to enemy fire to trigger his ability, while his chassis leaves him better suited for arc dodging. And, to arc dodge well, you need to get competitive with your initiative bid. If you run 4-LOM, I don't think you worry about a bid much at all -- Boba doesn't hate being the first player, as it means he gets to trigger Han before I5 opponents shoot. 4-LOM's stress provides another type of control which supplements Palob's token removal. I also think you create more flexibility in playing with upgrades (or building in a bit of a margin if elements of the list eventually go up in cost). I'm not convinced Advanced Sensors/Title is essential... you could drop them to make points for Elusiveness on 4-LOM, or give Boba more upgrades (an EPT like Debris Gambit, a Seismic Charge for some more swarm control, etc.).
  21. Like
    sionnach19 reacted to Xeletor in Scoundrels and Bounty Hunters   
    Give us alt art Han gunner card with han in carbonite!
  22. Like
    sionnach19 reacted to That Blasted Samophlange in What are people putting with Super Vader?   
    Vader will not be SUPER until he flies a Defender.   
  23. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from Wraithdt in 3rd Imperial Int 6 Ace   
    Vader as a Defender pilot is the absolute dream, for me. God knows how much he would cost though!
    Vult Skerris is a TIE ace in the Rebels TV show who has yet to appear in the game, and he serves as Thrawn's primary test pilot for the Defender chassis... he might be another solid contender.
  24. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from Herowannabe in 3rd Imperial Int 6 Ace   
    Vader as a Defender pilot is the absolute dream, for me. God knows how much he would cost though!
    Vult Skerris is a TIE ace in the Rebels TV show who has yet to appear in the game, and he serves as Thrawn's primary test pilot for the Defender chassis... he might be another solid contender.
  25. Like
    sionnach19 got a reaction from LordFajubi in 3rd Imperial Int 6 Ace   
    Vader as a Defender pilot is the absolute dream, for me. God knows how much he would cost though!
    Vult Skerris is a TIE ace in the Rebels TV show who has yet to appear in the game, and he serves as Thrawn's primary test pilot for the Defender chassis... he might be another solid contender.
×
×
  • Create New...