Jump to content

OmegaLeader144

Members
  • Content Count

    98
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OmegaLeader144

  1. So what you're saying is that you and you alone know how to fly the T-65 and people who've won World championships just are clueless. So not only do you have no data to back up you claim, you're going to ignore one of the main sources of objective data. And on this note I'm done, you clearly are so clueless you can't even understand what we're trying to tell you. (1) I didn't say I was the only one that knows how to fly. I am sure others have figured out the trick. (2) Tournaments are anything but objective, they are based . (3) You were the one asking about jousting value so I gave you an answer. Both can have Ion weapons which ships with Ion weapons pair well with the T-65.
  2. And plenty of people have destroyed T-65's without losing any of their own ships... That's the problem with trying to base an argument on anecdotal evidence... Your experience is a very, very tiny, in fact meaningless sample compared to every other game played in a given year. But if you're going to insist that everyone else is wrong and you're right. Then provide some objective facts to back up your exertion. List all the tournaments that have T-65's winning the day. Show us the math that proves the T-65's jousting value makes it efficient for the price. I don't pay attention to the tournaments, and when it is paired with a B-wing or Y-wing it has good jousting value.
  3. Anyone can win with almost any ship. But that doesn't change the fact that the ship is subpar. It quite simply costs too much for what it offers, especially in a standard tournament game. That doesn't mean you can't overcome the shortfall, but just because you can do that, doesn't mean there isn't an issue. Again, the math behind the game shows that the X-Wing is over priced. The fact that it rarely shows up in top tables of major tournaments shows this. The fact that the game's Developers have agreed it needs help shows this as well. The problem is people don't seem to know how to pair it well with other ships.
  4. I'm sorry to say but your opinion is simply wrong. It's not a great ship, and that's not a matter of opinion. It's backed up by both the math and years of tournament reports. This is quite frankly not subject to debate or opinion any more than saying 2+2=5. With Integrated Astro, it becomes a good ship, but is still not a top end ship in the competitive world. Tell that to all of the Scum Y-wings, Scum Headhunters, Scum Large ships, and Imperial Ships I have destroyed with the T-65. I've destroyed nearly every ship by flying it through an asteroid at one point in time or other. It doesn't mean asteroids are competitive ships. I destroyed all of those ships with the T-65 without those ships hitting asteroids or debris.
  5. I'm sorry to say but your opinion is simply wrong. It's not a great ship, and that's not a matter of opinion. It's backed up by both the math and years of tournament reports. This is quite frankly not subject to debate or opinion any more than saying 2+2=5. With Integrated Astro, it becomes a good ship, but is still not a top end ship in the competitive world. Tell that to all of the Scum Y-wings, Scum Headhunters, Scum Large ships, and Imperial Ships I have destroyed with the T-65.
  6. Not if you put Predator(or PTL) and BB-8 on Wedge.For only 34 points you can be 1/5 as maneuverable as Fel. No ship is as maneuverable as Fel.
  7. In my opinion it is one of the coolest ships in Star Wars, and that it doesn't need to be fixed it is still a great ship in the game. Whenever I fly Rebels, I usually put 1-2 T-65s in because of how good they are.
  8. In my opinion it still runs great, but why do others say it needs to be "fixed"?
  9. Thank you to sf1raptor for his idea for putting the Fang in the game. Thank you to the guy who thought about putting the ARC-170 in to the game. Thank to the guy who came up with putting the TIE/sf in the game. And thank you to everyone who supported my idea about the Shadow Caster and all of the other ideas for ships.
  10. It looks like someone threw a Firespray and a few TLTs into blender.
  11. The Tie Avenger and the Star wing would be a lot better than this.
  12. I hope that they put in a few of them (ARC-170, N-1, Scurrg H-6, ect.).
  13. Nice setup. The Swarm works REALLY well in Epic. Especially if your opponent has sunk most of their points in Epic ships and a smalls expensive escort. With the recent two Epic ships, FFG has ramped up the power a little bit but still not by enough. Ships like The Raider should be destroying 2 or 3 ships a round and they just don't. They are a ton of fun to play with, but not as practical as a cheap large ship with some crew members. After playing an Epic game where the Empire took on that Scum list I posted (the one with the 4 Aggressors), now my group sometimes makes an Epic ship mandatory to balance the scales. Ok. By the way, using 4 Aggressor is genius. They hit so hard (and are so hard to kill) it's not even funny! If 4 of them took up enough points to not be able to field a deadly swarm, perhaps you could focus fire them down if the dice played nice. But this isn't the case. If you go after the Aggressors, they (and the swarm) eat you up. If you go after the swarm... same result. BRUTAL list! Sweet.
  14. Nice setup. The Swarm works REALLY well in Epic. Especially if your opponent has sunk most of their points in Epic ships and a smalls expensive escort. With the recent two Epic ships, FFG has ramped up the power a little bit but still not by enough. Ships like The Raider should be destroying 2 or 3 ships a round and they just don't. They are a ton of fun to play with, but not as practical as a cheap large ship with some crew members. After playing an Epic game where the Empire took on that Scum list I posted (the one with the 4 Aggressors), now my group sometimes makes an Epic ship mandatory to balance the scales. Ok. By the way, using 4 Aggressor is genius.
  15. Because as far as upgrades and pilot abilities are concerned, a ship's name only needs to partially match.As far as the actual rules are concerned, they are not the same ship. If they were, it would be legal for me to put standard TIE Fighter models on TIE/fo bases when I play TIE/fos. It isn't. Actually, if the card is just TIE limited and not TIE fighter limited then it can apply to literally any TIE series ship. And your right. The two ship are not considered he same. I doesn't work like that with the T-70/T-65 X-wings so it doesn't work between the TIE fighter/fo Apparently he doesn't work like that. Edit: that was his original post.
  16. Thank you. I dont think I was being that rude pointing out his original mistake.. all he had to do was say "doh!".. and we all could have laughed it off. Okay .. I was ready to drop this, then you come right back and continue to claim that I deleted/ modified your original post. What the hell? Edit: Sorry I think I have misunderstood your original claim. I thought you meant that I edited your post in my quote of you, I thought you were claiming that I was lying and trying to make you look bad. I apologize if you saw the comment of me insulting you in this post, that was based on a misunderstanding. If you indeed mean that you highlighted part of your original text in your post and accidentally deleted before posting .. that is less offensive than claiming that I was lying. But I do have to wonder where the "and check your math" part of your comment went. It would mean that you somehow precisely deleted an entire sentence inside your paragraph ... before posting it. w/e .. I'm over it.. moving on. Thank you, and sorry about the misunderstanding. I was claiming that I accidentally deleted that part of the post. Also, the check your math part was my fault, I should have checked the cards instead of going off of memory. Anyway, I'm dropping this. Once again sorry about all of that.
×
×
  • Create New...