# fhdz

Members

165

## Reputation Activity

1. fhdz got a reaction from Demon4x4 in CLONE WARS CONFIRMED
This statement is mathematically problematic. By definition there is no smallest imaginable number, because as you yourself note, any number can simply be halved to become even smaller. And then I'm not sure I understand how many craps I'm dividing by. Is it zero? Because then the result is undefined, or in some cases infinite. Is it really small? Cause if it's less than one, that actually makes how much you care bigger. If it's more than one, well, then you do actually have some craps to give. For some reason I feel like you actually don't care very much, but that's the only interpretation not supported by your statement!
2. fhdz got a reaction from DelGriffen in CLONE WARS CONFIRMED
This statement is mathematically problematic. By definition there is no smallest imaginable number, because as you yourself note, any number can simply be halved to become even smaller. And then I'm not sure I understand how many craps I'm dividing by. Is it zero? Because then the result is undefined, or in some cases infinite. Is it really small? Cause if it's less than one, that actually makes how much you care bigger. If it's more than one, well, then you do actually have some craps to give. For some reason I feel like you actually don't care very much, but that's the only interpretation not supported by your statement!
3. fhdz got a reaction from CaptainJaguarShark in CLONE WARS CONFIRMED
This statement is mathematically problematic. By definition there is no smallest imaginable number, because as you yourself note, any number can simply be halved to become even smaller. And then I'm not sure I understand how many craps I'm dividing by. Is it zero? Because then the result is undefined, or in some cases infinite. Is it really small? Cause if it's less than one, that actually makes how much you care bigger. If it's more than one, well, then you do actually have some craps to give. For some reason I feel like you actually don't care very much, but that's the only interpretation not supported by your statement!
4. fhdz got a reaction from mazz0 in CLONE WARS CONFIRMED
This statement is mathematically problematic. By definition there is no smallest imaginable number, because as you yourself note, any number can simply be halved to become even smaller. And then I'm not sure I understand how many craps I'm dividing by. Is it zero? Because then the result is undefined, or in some cases infinite. Is it really small? Cause if it's less than one, that actually makes how much you care bigger. If it's more than one, well, then you do actually have some craps to give. For some reason I feel like you actually don't care very much, but that's the only interpretation not supported by your statement!
5. fhdz got a reaction from LordBlades in CLONE WARS CONFIRMED
This statement is mathematically problematic. By definition there is no smallest imaginable number, because as you yourself note, any number can simply be halved to become even smaller. And then I'm not sure I understand how many craps I'm dividing by. Is it zero? Because then the result is undefined, or in some cases infinite. Is it really small? Cause if it's less than one, that actually makes how much you care bigger. If it's more than one, well, then you do actually have some craps to give. For some reason I feel like you actually don't care very much, but that's the only interpretation not supported by your statement!
6. fhdz got a reaction from Bullox in CLONE WARS CONFIRMED
This statement is mathematically problematic. By definition there is no smallest imaginable number, because as you yourself note, any number can simply be halved to become even smaller. And then I'm not sure I understand how many craps I'm dividing by. Is it zero? Because then the result is undefined, or in some cases infinite. Is it really small? Cause if it's less than one, that actually makes how much you care bigger. If it's more than one, well, then you do actually have some craps to give. For some reason I feel like you actually don't care very much, but that's the only interpretation not supported by your statement!
7. fhdz got a reaction from T70 Driver in CLONE WARS CONFIRMED
This statement is mathematically problematic. By definition there is no smallest imaginable number, because as you yourself note, any number can simply be halved to become even smaller. And then I'm not sure I understand how many craps I'm dividing by. Is it zero? Because then the result is undefined, or in some cases infinite. Is it really small? Cause if it's less than one, that actually makes how much you care bigger. If it's more than one, well, then you do actually have some craps to give. For some reason I feel like you actually don't care very much, but that's the only interpretation not supported by your statement!
8. fhdz got a reaction from ViscerothSWG in CLONE WARS CONFIRMED
This statement is mathematically problematic. By definition there is no smallest imaginable number, because as you yourself note, any number can simply be halved to become even smaller. And then I'm not sure I understand how many craps I'm dividing by. Is it zero? Because then the result is undefined, or in some cases infinite. Is it really small? Cause if it's less than one, that actually makes how much you care bigger. If it's more than one, well, then you do actually have some craps to give. For some reason I feel like you actually don't care very much, but that's the only interpretation not supported by your statement!
9. fhdz got a reaction from PanchoX1 in CLONE WARS CONFIRMED
This statement is mathematically problematic. By definition there is no smallest imaginable number, because as you yourself note, any number can simply be halved to become even smaller. And then I'm not sure I understand how many craps I'm dividing by. Is it zero? Because then the result is undefined, or in some cases infinite. Is it really small? Cause if it's less than one, that actually makes how much you care bigger. If it's more than one, well, then you do actually have some craps to give. For some reason I feel like you actually don't care very much, but that's the only interpretation not supported by your statement!
10. fhdz got a reaction from VanderLegion in Does new Luke only work on single-arc turrets?
There are definitely distinct icons for single and double arc turrets, and Luke's card has the single-arc icon. Do we know for sure he works on the YTs?
Apologies if this has already come up, I didn't see anything on the first couple of pages.
11.
Here's the mistake you're making: "balance" doesn't mean that every list has a 50/50 chance against every other list. It means that, ideally, any list has a 50% win rate across a large number of games against different lists. There has always been an element of rock/paper/scissors to X-Wing. That's good. It's perfectly fine for some upgrades or pilots to be overpriced in some matchups and underpriced in others.
12.
Here's the mistake you're making: "balance" doesn't mean that every list has a 50/50 chance against every other list. It means that, ideally, any list has a 50% win rate across a large number of games against different lists. There has always been an element of rock/paper/scissors to X-Wing. That's good. It's perfectly fine for some upgrades or pilots to be overpriced in some matchups and underpriced in others.
13.
Here's the mistake you're making: "balance" doesn't mean that every list has a 50/50 chance against every other list. It means that, ideally, any list has a 50% win rate across a large number of games against different lists. There has always been an element of rock/paper/scissors to X-Wing. That's good. It's perfectly fine for some upgrades or pilots to be overpriced in some matchups and underpriced in others.
14.
Here's the mistake you're making: "balance" doesn't mean that every list has a 50/50 chance against every other list. It means that, ideally, any list has a 50% win rate across a large number of games against different lists. There has always been an element of rock/paper/scissors to X-Wing. That's good. It's perfectly fine for some upgrades or pilots to be overpriced in some matchups and underpriced in others.
15.
Here's the mistake you're making: "balance" doesn't mean that every list has a 50/50 chance against every other list. It means that, ideally, any list has a 50% win rate across a large number of games against different lists. There has always been an element of rock/paper/scissors to X-Wing. That's good. It's perfectly fine for some upgrades or pilots to be overpriced in some matchups and underpriced in others.
16.
Here's the mistake you're making: "balance" doesn't mean that every list has a 50/50 chance against every other list. It means that, ideally, any list has a 50% win rate across a large number of games against different lists. There has always been an element of rock/paper/scissors to X-Wing. That's good. It's perfectly fine for some upgrades or pilots to be overpriced in some matchups and underpriced in others.
17.
Here's the mistake you're making: "balance" doesn't mean that every list has a 50/50 chance against every other list. It means that, ideally, any list has a 50% win rate across a large number of games against different lists. There has always been an element of rock/paper/scissors to X-Wing. That's good. It's perfectly fine for some upgrades or pilots to be overpriced in some matchups and underpriced in others.
18. fhdz got a reaction from VanderLegion in Speculation: First Order and Resistance Conversion Kits
I think there's nearly no chance of the Rebel A-Wing being a Resistance ship too. Why do that when they can just release a brand new Resistance A-Wing instead?
19. fhdz got a reaction from Parakitor in Speculation: First Order and Resistance Conversion Kits
I think there's nearly no chance of the Rebel A-Wing being a Resistance ship too. Why do that when they can just release a brand new Resistance A-Wing instead?
20. fhdz got a reaction from Jedirev in Speculation: First Order and Resistance Conversion Kits
I think there's nearly no chance of the Rebel A-Wing being a Resistance ship too. Why do that when they can just release a brand new Resistance A-Wing instead?
21. fhdz got a reaction from PaulTiberius in X-wing 2.0: The Big Thread o’ Pilots
Also means you don't have to remember whether or not you've used the ability that round.
22. fhdz got a reaction from Wiredin in Speculation: First Order and Resistance Conversion Kits
I think there's nearly no chance of the Rebel A-Wing being a Resistance ship too. Why do that when they can just release a brand new Resistance A-Wing instead?
23. fhdz got a reaction from vtarin in confused about conversion packs
Because they need material for the avalanche of preview articles that are about to hit us.
24. fhdz got a reaction from Nyxen in confused about conversion packs
Because they need material for the avalanche of preview articles that are about to hit us.
25. fhdz got a reaction from PanchoX1 in Speculation: First Order and Resistance Conversion Kits
I think there's nearly no chance of the Rebel A-Wing being a Resistance ship too. Why do that when they can just release a brand new Resistance A-Wing instead?
×

• #### Activity

×
• Create New...