Jump to content

ManateeX

Members
  • Content Count

    777
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About ManateeX

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

1,009 profile views
  1. I wouldn't say that skirmish players moved to Legion so much as FFG moved to Legion. You can't really have a vibrant skirmish game if nothing changes, and FFG has already announced that they're not working on any new plastic. Even if they do miraculously release a Yoda expansion or something a year down the road, it's way too late to save skirmish where the player base has already taken a huge hit. Between the lack of new content and them leaving Spectre Cell dominant for so long, unfortunately the damage to the skirmish side has already been done.
  2. Deploy as close as possible, with the player who rolled the die choosing the location if there are multiple valid spaces
  3. And not only did the jawa swarm win in the final, but it did so against the second place list which was Han, Murne, Jarrod and Jyn. *sigh*
  4. I'm in a weird spot with FFG. Arkham Horror (2e) is up there with my favourite games of all time, but since I already own it and still love it I haven't been very interested in their other Arkham Files stuff. I did try (and I really enjoyed) the card game, but it gets pricey if you try to keep up with everything so so far I've only got the one run of expansions. They make TI4, another one of my all-time top games, but I know that the only people I'll ever get to play it with are the people who already own it so there's no point in me getting my own copy. And then of course there's Star Wars, my favourite IP. I've had mountains of fun with IA, both campaign and skirmish, but the way they just kind of stopped with no communication at all (which really hit the skirmish game hard) left a bad taste in my mouth. In theory I'd be interested in Destiny or Legion, but buying into IA so much only to have it stop suddenly has left me not wanting to spend so much money on what will probably be another similar experience. So that's my odd relationship with FFG in a nutshell: on the one hand they're almost certainly my favourite gaming company (they make 3 of my top 4 games) but on the other hand I find myself not at all interested in buying anything that they're making right now.
  5. I hope you're right, but I'm guessing some of their not wanting to outright announce that it's dead is that they're still selling the campaign boxes (and probably making new apps) and they're still running skirmish OP events. Coming out and saying that the game is finished would probably have a negative impact on both (even though I have no idea why that would affect whether people buy the campaign game, people always seem to worry about it for whatever reason).
  6. I felt similarly. I followed Sorastro's videos (fist things I ever painted!) but I generally left out the battle damage and weathering. Yes, it's probably more realistic, but I just love seeing my stormtroopers in that nice, shiny, white
  7. I see that comments on world domination are suspiciously absent...
  8. Yeah, I really wish they had something like the ? tokens when the game was released. Just imagine a world where taking these support characters was an interesting choice to make vs something that they had to subsequently balance a whole faction around.
  9. As someone who has no affiliation whatsoever with the IACP, I have to ask - um, what?? Is this comment at all helpful? You seem to be implying that the IACP steering committee intentionally designed this survey in such a way that it told them what they "wanted" to hear. Just think about that for a second. Why would they do that? Secret IACP Steering Committee Master Plan (Confidential) Step 1: Change imperial assault skirmish in a way that suits us Step 2: Convince the dozens, nay, perhaps SEVERAL HUNDRED people worldwide who might play IA without FFG support that we are correct by posting nefariously misleading surveys. (Insert evil laugh here) Step 3: ??? Step 4: Profit? World domination??? Haha I'm not trying to make light of your comment (well, not completely) but I seriously just don't understand where you're coming from. What do you mean by "YOUR" community vs "THE" community? Since before this began they've done nothing but ask for feedback over and over. Here, on the big facebook group, on every IA podcast under the sun. Exactly how do you propose that they reach THE community at large that they haven't already tried? ****, they have asked the community for suggestions on how to improve the surveys themselves. This does not sound like the work of madmen bent on total IA domination, but rather a group of people taking real time out of their lives to do the best they are able to keep the game we love alive. As for smothering criticism, if someone who's not even affiliated with the project saying "*sigh*" on a message board is enough to counter whatever point a person is making, I'd have to ask how good a point it was to begin with. Not to mention the fact that this voter feedback survey had a place at the bottom for comments about what you might like to see, and the IACP published each one of those suggestions in their feedback report. If there are any great ideas out there waiting to be found, wouldn't that have been a great place to put them so that the community could later vote? So if you have suggestions for how to fix IA, let's hear them! If you have suggestions for how to better solicit or tally community feedback, let's hear those! And sure, I guess if you just want to complain and be sad, you're welcome to do that, too
  10. Thematically I like changes like this (except the Jabba one, personally) but the problem with doing this in a competitive game is similar to the problem we talked about earlier with raising costs on things like eQuays. If you remove focus from Mercs and especially Rebels, two factions who have had all of their units designed around having it since day 1, who's going to stop Vader? You'd end up with competitive tournaments being imperial lists as far as the eye can see. Now you can say that these figures giving out focus shouldn't have been so powerful to begin with, and I agree with you on that (as would, I'd wager, the designers of the game in retrospect) but the fact is that, as it stands today, the figures that we have have been built with freely available focus in mind. You can't just get rid of it wholesale without completely changing the game balance (and tilting it towards the faction that doesn't rely on focus). Also, the Doubt card has helped to reduce the "sit back behind cover and focus your whole army" strategy that some people didn't like - if focus ends up still being a problem, I think going that route is probably a better way to do it. Maybe add some ways to remove conditions, but limit them to the rebel army or something like that to prevent imperial abuse?
  11. See page 4 of the FAQ https://images-cdn.fantasyflightgames.com/filer_public/84/a8/84a83869-63ea-4087-95c7-50039c4b5f0a/swi_faq_v4.pdf With that said, I don't know if there's an image of the new card text so I'm not sure what you'll be able to do with it.
  12. I guess one more thing to add that's just occurred to me (although it's kind of a continuation of my previous post) is that if we're balancing "down" then we would need to nerf every single Tier-1 figure simultaneously (otherwise we'll end up with a few standouts who just dominate). It's going to be tough to get every one of those changes right and even tougher to get enough people to agree what needs to be changed and how, not to mention it brings a whole mess of errata that we would need to start remembering all at the same time. Bringing lower figures up, by contrast, can be done in more controlled one-at-a-time way, gradually (re)introducing new figures as interest and comfort level dictates.
  13. My issue with trying to balance things to the lower power level of early skirmish is that there never really was a consistent power level in early skirmish. The first few waves were wildly unbalanced - no realistic number of cost increases on other figures will ever make me want to take Biv or Fenn or Garkhaan or Sorin or Fett or RGC or wing guards or ..... to a competitive event. I'm not unsympathetic to what you're saying - in a perfect world I, too, would like to see the average damage reduced. The issue, though, is that we're starting from what has been and is a pretty balanced meta from wave 7 onward (original SC notwithstanding). Yeah you could make weequays a bit more expensive or remove some of the big hunter cards, but if you do than it's just going to be Vader, Vader, Vader as far as the eye can see with nothing that can get through his defence to bring him down. The original Vader got around that by being too slow and too expensive to field a list around, but the downside to that was he just never got played. It's not just a simple thing to start reducing costs and banning cards without also taking into account the things they counter (and the things those counters counter). And at some point, I think I'd rather just keep the newer figures who are already in a good, fun place (Vader, Han, Thrawn, etc.) without having to nerf all of those to the ground as well. I'm not saying it's not a noble idea to balance to a lower lever, I just think it's far far easier to bring other figures up to the higher level a few at a time.
  14. That's pretty much my exact story. I still enjoy the campaign, no doubt, but I tried a local skirmish tourney on a whim and LOVED it. It's just the right amount of skill/thoughtfulness/randomness for me, not to mention the fact that the list-building gives me something to think about at lunch times
  15. It's tough to make a scum list (or any list, really ) with just the core, but I don't see any problems with the one you've got! Your biggest issue is probably going to be struggling to do damage outside of IG-88. The Nexu is a super-fun figure that I really love, but they can either be a hero or a complete dud depending on their dice rolls (on both offense and defense). Nothing wrong with a little swingy-ness though, especially if you go into your games with the right mindset, knowing that the white die can blank just as often as it dodges. If you were going to change away one figure I'd probably make it Mak - his ability seems so cool but I've just never really been able to get it to work. With that said, you've got two focusers in Gideon and 3P0 so maybe with the extra green die he'll be able to push enough damage through. Another option (which also takes up your extra point) might be to replace him with a regular Nexu and add some creature/brawler cards to your command deck. Honestly, the biggest thing you're going to run up against if you take this to a tourney is that other people will likely have better command cards than you do. The Jabba's Realm wave in particular had a lot of cards that are really key to putting out a lot of damage with scum (in particular: Assassinate, Heightened Reflexes, Tools for the Job, Primary Target). It's too bad, but there's not really any way around the fact that you're going to be at a bit of a disadvantage without them. With that said, don't let it stop you from playing - it's a fantastic game, and I don't think you're going to regret having picked it up
×
×
  • Create New...