Jump to content

MandalorianMoose

Members
  • Content Count

    1,840
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    MandalorianMoose reacted to The Jabbawookie in When to release Raddus Bomb ?   
    There’s also Squall in the 2 ship matchup; it forces many Raddus builds to play a little more aggressively by threatening dropships across the table (though it’s easier to table as well.)
  2. Haha
    MandalorianMoose reacted to TallGiraffe in The Ackbar slash??   
    @AllWingsStandyingBy sounds like you hate fun. 
  3. Thanks
    MandalorianMoose reacted to Baltanok in Regionals Data Project 2018-2019 Season   
    OK, did a quick run through Pryce fleets- top 25% of pryce fleets vs bottom 25%, plus Non-pryce winning imps (NPWI)
    Successful Pryce fleets have less investment in ships (258 points) & more investment in squads (130) than unsuccessful Pryce fleets (ship 278, squad 110) or winning empire (323 ship, 69 squad)
    (note that ship investment points include upgrades & admirals, not just the raw durasteel tonnage)
    deployments not notably different, with all groups ranging from 5.8 to 6.0 deployments.
    Pryce is generally low activation (win 2.3, lose 2.8) vs winning imps (4.4)
    Also generally low flotilla, as would be expected from that activation average (0.3 vs 1.3 for NPWI)
    winning pryce is more likely to have medium ships (0.94 vs 0.44 NPWI), less likely to have Demo (0.2 vs 0.46 NPWI)  (looks like Pryce likes quasars)
    Avenger is not notably different (0.5 vs 0.44)
     
    Hope that helps.  I know that you asked about factors in tournaments, but making that sort of analysis is hard, without having some sort of tournament-wide metric that we could look at.  (i.e. the Austin regional had average of 62 squads, while the FFG HQ regional had 75 average squad points.)  Then I'd have to sort out tournaments which had pryce winning from those that pryce lost at.
    It's not impossible, but it would be a major undertaking, and unless we had a tournament metric that has significant variance, we'd probably end up with "minor differences between tournament fields - I got nothing useful to say."
  4. Like
    MandalorianMoose reacted to ZumperEmpire in Regionals Data Project 2018-2019 Season   
    This was the winning list from the Mtn view tournament, 1st round it played Raddus profundity, 2nd round Jerry, 3rd Rieekan msu w/YT's and friends, 4th round was against Raddus liberty drop against Mighty Hedgehog. 
     
    demo thrawn 
    Author: ZumperEmpire
    Faction: Galactic Empire
    Points: 393/400  
    Commander: Grand Admiral Thrawn
    Assault Objective: Precision Strike
    Defense Objective: Hyperspace Assault
    Navigation Objective: Superior Positions
     
    [ flagship ] Gladiator I-Class Star Destroyer (56 points)
    -  Grand Admiral Thrawn  ( 32  points) 
    -  Demolisher  ( 10  points) 
    -  Captain Brunson  ( 5  points) 
    -  Ordnance Experts  ( 4  points) 
    -  Engine Techs  ( 8  points) 
    -  Assault Proton Torpedoes  ( 5  points) 
    = 120 total ship cost
     
    Gozanti-class Cruisers (23 points)
    -  Bomber Command Center  ( 8  points) 
    = 31 total ship cost
     
    Victory II-Class Star Destroyer (85 points)
    -  Dominator  ( 12  points) 
    -  Minister Tua  ( 2  points) 
    -  Veteran Gunners  ( 5  points) 
    -  Disposable Capacitors  ( 3  points) 
    -  Electronic Countermeasures  ( 7  points) 
    -  Quad Battery Turrets  ( 5  points) 
    -  Heavy Ion Emplacements  ( 9  points) 
    = 128 total ship cost
     
    1 JumpMaster 5000 ( 12 points) 
    3 TIE Defender Squadrons ( 48 points) 
    1 Maarek Steele ( 21 points) 
    1 Tempest Squadron ( 13 points) 
    1 Colonel Jendon ( 20 points) 
    = 114 total squadron cost
  5. Like
    MandalorianMoose reacted to Revanur in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    Numbered your points to clarify what I am awnsering.
    1) Everything to play is in the X-wing 2.0 core game. I played my first trial game without the app or any other online reference.
    2) The cards are still there to visualize the list in a way that is in my eyes clearer to view from accross the board then a hand written or printed out army list I was used to with games like Warhammer. Also I still like to go through my Armada ship cards etc, but haven't build a list that way in ages.
    3) Even when the game designers and testers are extremely passionate about the game and strife only for the best game with great balance mistakes will happen. And as a game grows in size through new expansion it will become more difficult to find all interactions. Things will always be overlooked during testing that the community will find, everyone playing the game brings way more time into it than any company can test it. I welcome the option to fix it.
    4) You only need to when you want to customize your upgrades yourself, no need otherwise. And the bar to do it is not that high.
    5) It's not incomplete and how do you know it's better? Only because you have a minute less work on it? I think the better game is the one with better balance and the one that can evolve to that better balanced state. Although Armada's balance is pretty decent I would welcome certain ships and squadrons getting different costs to make them viable.
    6) Luckily that's everyones choice to make for themselves/
    7) For you that may be true. For others it will be more. I now play X-wing 2.0 with a lot of fun and am buying a collection for it. Something I wouldn't have have done with 1.0
     
    I guess we will never agree on this and that's fine. To each their own way of enjoying a game.
     
  6. Thanks
    MandalorianMoose reacted to IronNerd in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    So every ship in the game is perfectly balanced right now? The Victory and the Pelta are perfectly balanced against say the ISD and the CR90? People make mistakes, they release unbalanced ships. The assumption that they are producing perfect balance now, and will continue to (assuming they keep giving us more product...), is silly. Why would we not want the ability to adjust things?
    Regardless, this conversation isn't getting us anywhere. One side wants an app, one side doesn't. Agree to disagree? Just like we've learned to do on many other divisive Armada topics? 
  7. Like
    MandalorianMoose reacted to Onidsen in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    You know, the simple way to solve the issue would be to have the core set and all expansions have a printout with the points costs of all of the ships and cards in them. You still don't have to errata cards and can adjust points costs on the fly via the app and online pdfs, but the game is still playable without the app directly out of the box.
    Tournament players would just have to print off PDFs whenever points costs change.
    I mean, I think all of the whining about having to find the PDFs online is a bit overblown, but the basic idea about wanting to be able to play the game out of the box without needing anything but what comes in the box is a valid one. And it would be easy for FFG to do that and get all the benefits of updating via the app.
  8. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from Green Knight in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    I mean, you’re not required to do anything really. If you want to play the game with Monopoly models and cards against humanity cards as upgrades you are free to do so. 
    I on the other hand think that being able to points/slot adjust cards in the future as metas shift/content gets out into players hands is a pretty cool thing. Being able to handwave Tarkin down to 30 points, add a dretro to the vic, get errata out into the Wild quickly all sound pretty nifty to me.
    Also- do you guys just not play with any of the FAQ or updated rules? Cause, ya know, the only place to find those are shudder... 
    Online
  9. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
  10. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from Benjan Meruna in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    I mean..... don’t they have everything in a PDF in addition to the app
  11. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from Green Knight in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    I mean, you’re not required to do anything really. If you want to play the game with Monopoly models and cards against humanity cards as upgrades you are free to do so. 
    I on the other hand think that being able to points/slot adjust cards in the future as metas shift/content gets out into players hands is a pretty cool thing. Being able to handwave Tarkin down to 30 points, add a dretro to the vic, get errata out into the Wild quickly all sound pretty nifty to me.
    Also- do you guys just not play with any of the FAQ or updated rules? Cause, ya know, the only place to find those are shudder... 
    Online
  12. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
  13. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
  14. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
  15. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from Green Knight in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    I mean, you’re not required to do anything really. If you want to play the game with Monopoly models and cards against humanity cards as upgrades you are free to do so. 
    I on the other hand think that being able to points/slot adjust cards in the future as metas shift/content gets out into players hands is a pretty cool thing. Being able to handwave Tarkin down to 30 points, add a dretro to the vic, get errata out into the Wild quickly all sound pretty nifty to me.
    Also- do you guys just not play with any of the FAQ or updated rules? Cause, ya know, the only place to find those are shudder... 
    Online
  16. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
  17. Like
    MandalorianMoose reacted to Revanur in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    That's what 3rd party army builders are for. For Armada I also build most of my lists on Armada Warlords and not with the cards themselves. A lot easier then a pdf file and will be supported way after FFG stops supporting the game.
    I really don't understand the fuz people are making about it. You can play the game right out of the box, although not with full customization by using the pre-build threat cards and If you want to fully customize go to the app, pdf or 3rd party army builder. That's not a lot of work to do and gives the upside that they can fix mistakes with the plus side of having the meta-game change once in a while without them having to release the next OP ship.
  18. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
  19. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
  20. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
  21. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
  22. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
  23. Haha
    MandalorianMoose reacted to Bertie Wooster in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    I play without the FAQ all the time. I bring Rhymer and TIE Bombers, three flotillas (two with BCC and one with Jamming Field). My opponents pick my Most Wanted and then all my TIE Bombers are Keyan clones than can shoot at medium range. What's not to love?
    (Not a true story.)
  24. Like
    MandalorianMoose reacted to duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    I just don't see how it would be any different than things are now.  You go online, read the latest FAQ/errata, and then use a fleet building website to make your fleet, the author of which has already updated everything.
    Numerous cards have already been modified.  Honestly what's a few more?
  25. Like
    MandalorianMoose got a reaction from duck_bird in FFG ARMADA Article: Interview online!!!   
    By far my favorite part about this whole thing is how y’all are complaining about having to use the internet on the internet
×