Jump to content

starrius

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    378

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by starrius

  5. Posted

    800pts actually feels about right at the moment. You can' bring everything which means limiting choice whic means actually building you army. I feel 1000-1200 you can have everything youbreally want which kinda feels to me as reducing tactical choices.  Once you get more units and there is more choice raising it to say 1000 I think is good but at the same point the 800pt games last about the righ amount of time

  6. Posted

    42 minutes ago, Orcdruid said:

    Your friend was wrong. The wording for ion says "a vehicle" not "a vehicle mini". That means if the unit is wounded then the unit gets an ion token.

    Yeah I tried to say it' all one unit even using runewars to so basically every unit is basically 1 model and multiple models make up its wound tracker

  7. Posted

    So a discussion happened in a game due to wording on a card.

     

    The ion gun for rebele troopers. Hit a unit of speeder bikes. It did enough damahe to kill 1. So ion token

     The guy really argued that because the model that was damaged died he shouldn't get the job token. 

  10. Posted

    I don' main pheonix but I do play them a fair bit. I find one of the things about deck making for pheonix is that there are a lot of taste looking pheonix whose abilities are good but just slow down the game. Try smiling down characters a little and characters like isawa mashinaro (bow during fire ring to kill a 2 coster) are very good especially vs scorpion who tend to run a lot more smaller guys. 

  12. Posted

    The issue I see with the idea of these alternative winning methods is they won't be viable.

     

    Not because of hard to do. But because unless they create new tokens which to me seem to be part of a big box then how are you going to track It?  The current rules state you are not allowed to make notes during a game (tournament) so this would make any victory over turns impossible to track and be legal

  14. Posted

    3 hours ago, AradonTemplar said:

    I can't personally believe they'll rush or shotgun the clan packs, and am optimistically hoping for one every three months, which is still painfully slow in my opinion. This is probably the most disappointing way to increase content I can think of. I agree with the above, though, it would have been cool to have the Core Sets + clan packs as the starting option. "Get three core sets, and then check out the clan packs of what interests you for more options." Then do regular cycles after that. It gets the expanded card pool out there, and also lets people skip buying all three core sets if they want, because the Clan packs reduce the need to have triples of everything.

    Too late for that now though. I just hope they still have Deluxe boxes, because that would mean they could focus on story events in those, and have well-rounded content.

    I think 1 every month is still to slow for clan packs

  18. Posted

    Just now, Ishi Tonu said:

    Treat them like you would any other player who plays anything else.  If someone wants to jump ship each time a new FotM deck comes along then it will only make you a better player for when you participate in a competitive event.  And if you don't have people to play against them you end up with some real pretty cards that just sit in a box.  

    I agree but we all know that there are a lot of people who take clan loyalty very seriously and all it takes is for some to make comments and see a backlash. I have a clan, crane, but really I finds a few clans styles interesting and sometimes feel that cranes cards compared to other clans are a bit flat. So I'm sure like everyone I always have random decks with me for fun and to know how the other decks function

  19. Posted

    While I'm sure a great deal of players, especially old5r players, will show their clan loyalty I think for every person who does there will be a person who doesn't. This is now an LCG and this gives people that option.  My obly thought when it comes to this is how we as a community treat the players who just play something because it's OK or FotM. I believe this will be the test of our community

  20. Posted

    I strongly believe at the current state of the game this isn  a out broken cards. I feel this is more a out negative experiences. Currently the pool of players is large and there are a lot of people with a huge difference in experience in card  games. And cards that do the negative experience for the newer to the genre are what I feel is more damaging to the game than saying it's broken

  21. Posted

    2 hours ago, GoblinGuide said:

    And Ambush says "put those characters into play as participating characters" even though you can choose only one. Does that mean that if you choose only one character Ambush doesn't do anything?

    But you missed the beginnin of ambush.

     

    Choose up to 2 scorpion characters.

    That makes the rest of the card still work.

     

    Cards taken out of context with the rest of it's card can be used to dispute anything

    JJ48 reacted to this

  22. Posted

    On 12/1/2017 at 8:32 PM, GoblinGuide said:

    But that is exactly what the ruling says: that you can't declare elements of the ring's elements. If you WotP the Earth ring that is also Air your opponent can't declare an Earth or Air conflict for the rest of the phase, but if they can still declare Void and put in their own Seeker of Knowledge and WotP won't care.

    Actually it says the rings element not plural

  23. Posted

    As a crane player I agree that guest of honour and the crone are both oppressive.  But the gueat of honour is a character you have to plan for.  

    What I've found with crab is if the guest us attacking because you are not in control you have to do what you can to just not let it break they can generally win the conflict. But by being agressive you can force the guest into a military conflict which crab shine vs crane.  Sometimes it' worth pushing maybe making your opponent believe you have bansai! Or charge which forces the opponent into using the guest which frees up the other attack to maybe void ring it to get it off the board early.

  24. Posted

    8 hours ago, GoblinGuide said:

    But that is exactly what the ruling says: that you can't declare elements of the ring's elements. If you WotP the Earth ring that is also Air your opponent can't declare an Earth or Air conflict for the rest of the phase, but if they can still declare Void and put in their own Seeker of Knowledge and WotP won't care.

    I don't agree with that and I think that as a ruling is bad for the game.  WotP stats that rings element not elements . Tbh all they need to do is make WotP not playable during a conflict and then it's fine.

×
×
  • Create New...