Jump to content

Tlfj200

Members
  • Content Count

    2,266
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tlfj200

  1. I'm in a quantum state of two answers: FO players aren't really people and Do what you want on the bottom tables
  2. WAT? Uh... man, I'm sorry. That also likely needs a marshal call. That's pretty inexcusable.
  3. that doesn't change the fact that half of all sep lists in the cut had a nantex, and the separatists had a much higher conversion rate than the rest of the factions. It also may mean nothing.
  4. Wait, I mean, clearly FFG supports mobile fortressing. And since they do, the krayts are in the lab, removing the "mobile" part. We got you, x-wing community.
  5. I mean, the answer should be there is communication, especially at worlds. This is not a bright timeline
  6. Q: Can Snap Shot or Foresight be chosen as a special weapon to be used for a ship's attack during the Engagement Phase? A: Yes. The phrase "after an enemy ship executes a maneuver, you may perform this attack against it as a bonus attack" allows the attack to be used as a bonus attack under the specified circumstances, but does not disqualify it from being used during the Engagement Phase.
  7. It's worth noting that basically half of all sep lists in the cut had a nantex. Even sear swarms brought chertek in many cases... Just noting, since CIS had an outlier conversion rate.
  8. Sort of. Like, part of the problem using the 200-x as a proxy for "going to time" is that plenty of games that "go to time" feel resolved as well. Like, one player is basically in an unwinnable position, and time was simply called. Rephrased - not all games that go to time are "unresolved".
  9. so, if I'm reading this correctly (and correct me if I'm not). Looking at republic: They have the least percentage of finished games (45%), and have a worse winning % when games are finished before time versus going to time (47% vs 50.9%)?
  10. You keep trying to say this ironically... but I'm pretty sure you actually were always a first order player...
  11. Firing arc is defined in the RR. I can pull it up, but the short answer is no: only printed arcs and mobile turret arcs (the rotating cardboard arcs).
  12. Could you imagine if the devs and the marshal didn't discuss rulings beforehand? That'd be really insane and stupid, right?
  13. you're assuming the devs didn't actually write it as intended...? What if they did intend for it to be a secondary weapon as well?
  14. I guess. However, where is the line between noting you disagree with it, and bullying? Like, Dee and Paul, both Marshals of national-level events (whatever they're called now), are noting they would use the warning system under the stalling rules, and mitch simply has videos as illustration. Like, it's sort of a jump to think they're twisting their rules to specifically bully him personally out of events. Mitch wasn't even going to attend NOVA?
×
×
  • Create New...