Jump to content

Truthiness

Members
  • Content Count

    3,317
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Truthiness

  1. Is there data for this anywhere? I didn't see anything from it. I'd love to have it for the data sheet.
  2. Well that's a bloody shame. That guy had ideas.
  3. Does that guy even still play this game?
  4. Are...are we talking about Sato? The guy who's currently tied with a commander that's been in exactly *THREE* recorded tournaments?
  5. Sadly only speed 4 these days. Need some more beef to hang with these big *** ships.
  6. I have less of a fear of engaging it directly. It's a good build, but I'd hardly call it all powerful. It's simply the best way of using something I consider to be a very limited tool.
  7. I don't enjoy the squadron game, so if you get enjoyment out of it, the list could absolutely be enjoyable for you. I enjoy ship maneuver and the list has absolutely none of that. The Magnites actively encourage the exact opposite: go slow with your front toward enemy.
  8. As @jamie nasmyth said, I'm of the opinion that the best hawk build is what we're calling Hawk134. The problem I've found with Hawk is that unless you can force your opponent too shoot it, it doesn't have enough firepower or reach to decisively impact the game. Even bidding for second and trying to force objectives doesn't always do enough. I've played against Hawk MSU enough times to know it's not particularly difficult to just murder the smalls and take your smaller win. A hawk, 2 flots, and max squads essentially guarantees ship shots have to be directed at the hawk. It's much harder to ignore the hawk. I recommend watching Aresius in the World Cup. His style of list is the one I expect to become the competitive hawk archetype. Now is it enjoyable to play? Not at all.
  9. Alright, I've got some time this morning. I'm playing catch up. Vienna and Stockholm are in. More to follow throughout the day.
  10. Early word is through season 1 she's a bit behind.
  11. Yup, Onagers and Starhawks weren't counting. I fixed it in a way that makes future addition of new ships somewhat easier for me. Thanks! No idea what happened with that single squad column for Imps, but that's fixed as well
  12. Yes and yes. I've been too busy to get much input done of late, but I'll get it eventually.
  13. Appreciated. I've never done anything with them for two reasons. 1) Spotty reporting. It's the thing I seem least likely to get. 2) The differing number of rounds makes it a little more difficult to gauge.
  14. Any idea the total attendance? Are you telling me #1 was a netlist of Mack's Vancouver list?
  15. Roger. I'll get to it when I can. I'm gonna be pretty limited until at least Friday. I have a 10 page paper to crank out by Friday. Yaaaaaaaay.
  16. He might not have wanted to get hit by Lando that turn, who would have been in pouncing range of any attack on the 90. I suspect he also thought he might strip some if the Lib's tokens off and kill it with the ISD. There were a lot of little things like that which could have swing things differently. He killed that 90 in any case. I don't think it ever got off a shot.
  17. Truthiness defeats @BrobaFett 400-126 Brobafett was First Player and selected Asteroid Tactics This game was...weird. Lots of very strange dice rolls that changed the game significantly. In the end, I managed to slow down Broba's squads just enough to avoid ship losses until the last turn. Mon Karren was coming back around to finish off the ISD, but it didn't quite have enough yaw to stay on the table anyway.
  18. Here's a compiled list of orphaned data to date. If you have of any of it available, please share: Upland, CA- Top 3 only Ashburn, VA- Missing #9, #17, #20, #21, #24 and #26. Mountain View, CA- No data Raleigh, NC- Only have top 4 plus #7 London, UK- Only have #3, #5, #7, #14, #16, and #21 Calgary, AB- Missing bottom 3. Krakow, Poland- No fleet data Bremerton, WA- No Data Midlothian, VA- Missing #14-15 and #25-27. Thanks @CyborgNinja! Gautier, MS- No Data Las Vegas, NV (Grand)- Sporadic data in @geek19's hands, awaiting input Sevilla, Spain- No Data
  19. Lots of updates to the front page. Thank you to everyone that sent things in. @geek19 has he has some LVO data in hand, so please continue to send things his way.
  20. Public Service Announcement: @GiledPallaeon chickened out if his jank
  21. Post here or PM will do. If you need to email the info for whatever reason, I can get you my email by PM.
  22. On a hunch, I took a look at the Intel and Strategic formulas, and sure enough they were wrong. Same column confusion error that's been haunting me all season. I would really love to know when I randomly inserted the extra column that managed to throw everything off... Anyway, it's been fixed. As always, please let me know when something doesn't pass the sniff test.
×
×
  • Create New...