Jump to content

John Constantine

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by John Constantine

  1. Extremely similar to my Saruman stuff earlier in this thread.
  2. I think it is very clever you made use of the victory display mechanic.
  3. Hi. Since you are doing what I've essentially done once, I think you mite be interested in looking at my interpretations from the past: https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/1684833/lotr-lcg-rework-project-v10-release
  4. This is not how slavic barbarians looked like thou. This is civilized slavic warrior look.
  5. Best you can hope for is what happened to Harad, which wasn't much.
  6. Why? You already snatched the original post. No point in having the images in non-original one :'D Also, look - it's dat elven butt from the First Player token!
  7. This is not a saga so I don't see why contract would be limited to it.
  8. https://www.fantasyflightgames.com/en/news/2019/6/18/concerning-hobbits/
  9. https://images-cdn.fantasyflightgames.com/filer_public/90/19/90191e4e-a341-4379-b398-5963b7a87ebf/mec01_online_only_rules_reference_for_website.pdf
  10. https://images-cdn.fantasyflightgames.com/filer_public/90/19/90191e4e-a341-4379-b398-5963b7a87ebf/mec01_online_only_rules_reference_for_website.pdf
  11. Wow, the new Burning Brand is almost like the way I reworked it in my "fix the game" project long long ago: I was a little more liberal.
  12. I don't think it has a cost in a traditional sense you mean. It has no resource cost, and if it's double sided - it doesn't go into the deck. You include it into your deck and it starts the game in play immediately, like a boon permanent from saga.
  13. Quite interesting. I hope article that explores that card comes soon. Thank you.
  14. What is the fullest description of the visible text on the contract?
  15. It seems I was right about contract being an agenda equivalent from the AGoT2 LCG. Sad that second hero is not Saruman tho. Fingers crossed for him in the packs. Grima + Smeagol + Nya'shish deck, anybody?
  16. What if the One Ring is an example of new contract card type? I mean, it sounds like an Agenda to me, it's a card that doesn't go into your deck and is in play immediately, it alters the rules - you're gonna go 5 threat earlier, and it alters deckbuilding - offers the access to the cards you'll otherwise won't have access to.
  17. My guess that Contracts gonna be like the Agenda from AGoT2. A card that defines your deck, provides some benefits, alters the deckbuilding rules, applies some restrictions, etc. Like, you cannot include dwarves into your deck, but your elves get +1 wp or whatever.
  18. 1/2/1/2 Ranged is a very weak statline for a 3 costed unique character that is supposed to sacrifice itself. Very weird, considering the powercreep going on.
  19. What do you mean lasts forever? It's a single time threat reduction.
  20. https://www.fantasyflightgames.com/en/news/2019/4/2/a-shadow-in-the-east/ I remember I was rooting for a Smeagol hero long ago.
  21. That's strange, I remember it being one of the easy ones, beating it on my first try.
  • Create New...