Jump to content

John Constantine

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by John Constantine

  1. This is not a saga so I don't see why contract would be limited to it.
  2. https://www.fantasyflightgames.com/en/news/2019/6/18/concerning-hobbits/
  3. https://images-cdn.fantasyflightgames.com/filer_public/90/19/90191e4e-a341-4379-b398-5963b7a87ebf/mec01_online_only_rules_reference_for_website.pdf
  4. https://images-cdn.fantasyflightgames.com/filer_public/90/19/90191e4e-a341-4379-b398-5963b7a87ebf/mec01_online_only_rules_reference_for_website.pdf
  5. Wow, the new Burning Brand is almost like the way I reworked it in my "fix the game" project long long ago: I was a little more liberal.
  6. I don't think it has a cost in a traditional sense you mean. It has no resource cost, and if it's double sided - it doesn't go into the deck. You include it into your deck and it starts the game in play immediately, like a boon permanent from saga.
  7. Quite interesting. I hope article that explores that card comes soon. Thank you.
  8. What is the fullest description of the visible text on the contract?
  9. It seems I was right about contract being an agenda equivalent from the AGoT2 LCG. Sad that second hero is not Saruman tho. Fingers crossed for him in the packs. Grima + Smeagol + Nya'shish deck, anybody?
  10. What if the One Ring is an example of new contract card type? I mean, it sounds like an Agenda to me, it's a card that doesn't go into your deck and is in play immediately, it alters the rules - you're gonna go 5 threat earlier, and it alters deckbuilding - offers the access to the cards you'll otherwise won't have access to.
  11. My guess that Contracts gonna be like the Agenda from AGoT2. A card that defines your deck, provides some benefits, alters the deckbuilding rules, applies some restrictions, etc. Like, you cannot include dwarves into your deck, but your elves get +1 wp or whatever.
  12. 1/2/1/2 Ranged is a very weak statline for a 3 costed unique character that is supposed to sacrifice itself. Very weird, considering the powercreep going on.
  13. What do you mean lasts forever? It's a single time threat reduction.
  14. https://www.fantasyflightgames.com/en/news/2019/4/2/a-shadow-in-the-east/ I remember I was rooting for a Smeagol hero long ago.
  15. That's strange, I remember it being one of the easy ones, beating it on my first try.
  16. Seems like a fitting place to showcase my ye olde Saruman designs from times long gone: Toys designed around the second version of Saruman. First one is standalone.
  17. Reducing damage to 1 was my first thought, but then I thought it would be too powerful because it would make defending trivial with just a little bit of healing.
  18. 1 sounds too weak for a Guarded item. Like, why even bother. 2 sounds too little to bother for me as well, but that's me.
  19. https://www.fantasyflightgames.com/en/news/2019/2/8/the-fate-of-wilderland/ I'm glad to finally see another Istari hero, albeit a bit salty it's no Saruman.
  20. I've seen all them player spoilers at Beorn LCG.
  • Create New...