Jump to content

RedPriest

Members
  • Content Count

    347
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About RedPriest

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    Winchester,VA USA

Recent Profile Visitors

963 profile views
  1. GRENADE! In the linked article, "A-Wings Suck", the author makes some fair points from a theatrical standpoint. The X-Wings destroyed the death star and are, overall, more iconic. The A-Wings claim to fame, in the original trilogy, was "destroying" the Executor. Why a starship the size of a small country does not have an auxiliary bridge is a topic for another discussion. With some exposure to the old EU, I also agree with the assessment of the type of pilots the A-Wings are depicted as having. I'll also expand on the one brief technical detail the author included. The A-Wing does come off as a fighter built to "match" the TIE fighters/Interceptors. In the second world war, the US didn't build Zeros to combat Zeros, they built Corsairs (X-Wings) and Thunderbolts (B-Wings).
  2. Right up there with their online store price fixing. Not surprised.
  3. Good trade with @Card Knight . Thank you good sir.
  4. And they are better men...er...ships because of it. Heh, "dong".
  5. Disagree. I have three. Tough little ships.
  6. Yup. Part of the reason I held off on getting one. The ship design is uninspiring. After buying a bunch of expansions for Imperials, I felt like the Rebs needed something new.
  7. And pay full price, in our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate our wallets!
  8. I'll take duplicate uniques off anyone buying more than one.
  9. Trade in progress. Thank you though.
  10. Kindling. Honestly, how many objective tokens does one really need? 😏
  11. Seconded. With the 1200 pt rules, you won't be wanting to get rid of anything.
  12. USA Have 12 painted standard TIE fighters 6 black primed standard TIE fighters Want 18 UNPAINTED standard TIE fighters.
  13. Poor Screed. He needs better screen representation. Here, is how I first saw him:
×
×
  • Create New...