Jump to content

Forgottenlore

Members
  • Content Count

    8,504
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Forgottenlore

  1. I like it. A lot, really. Design is clearly inspired by the cr-90, but it doesn’t just look like a bigger version of it with more gribblies. Those rows of deck lighting midships give it a very cruise ship vibe. Assuming that falcon is to the same scale, it miiight be doable as a huge ship in x-Wing. I’d buy one.
  2. Star Wars: Attack Wing?
  3. I think his point is that you can see the posters without seeing the movie. Nobody puts spoiler tags on the DVD covers.
  4. Forgottenlore

    raider

    The SSD is 24.5” long. So, a bit longer than the Raider should be. The SSD is really flat though.
  5. Forgottenlore

    raider

    This is correct. The raider has always been the same length as the corvette, and has always been at the different scale.
  6. Meh. I’ve got SW:Revisited. I’m good.
  7. As did Avatar. Endgame actually passed Avatars first run total significantly before the extra footage was added.
  8. So were they, which is why they’re ignoring everything but 1&2.
  9. Something I suggested a few months ago was keeping the insta kill ramming, but separate out the planning phase for huge ships. So a round would go Huge ship planning reveal huge ship dials, but they don’t move yet normal ship planning normal ship movement huge ship movement It would probably slow things down too much, but would capture the idea that it’s pretty easy to predict where a huge ship is going to be, but still allow for devastating rams if the fighter pilot mis judged positioning. doesnt look like that’s what they did though.
  10. The thing is, if the tracker was meant to track separate values for fore and aft sections, it would be labeled as such, there would be icons indicating which number was which, and it would be formatted with the numbers front and back, not side to side. With the way the tracker is currently designed, I’d have an easier time believing it tracked shields and energy for port and starboard sections than fore and aft.
  11. I think GenCon presage is pretty much a given, considering the timing of the announcement and supposed release
  12. Yeah, the first picture in the “larger world” article shows a card that details how the wingmen have to be arranged around the leader.
  13. The article said a new, plastic maneuver tool. Probably something similar to the armada tool, though how it does speed 0 banks is a question.
  14. I’m sure the sculpts will be the same, bit the c-roc, at least, looks like a new paint job. Or so I thought.
  15. I know that under normal circumstances you were limited to the number of CC the game came with. This might be a special case, but absent anything to clarify, I would probably say you couldn’t do the transfer action if there were no CCs in your reserves.
  16. Floating is because of density and pressure, but the pressure is caused by gravity. So I don’t think float-y things would move toward a surface, but once there they probably wouldn’t easily get engulfed again. The only reason all the water would stay together is because of the surface tension (gravity from the mass of the water itself should be negligible) BTW, sorry all for the off topic-ness, but it’s an interesting thought experiment.
  17. Not sure they got it right though. I think you could still swim to the “surface” in the giant bubble, you just couldn’t actually leave the water entirely. So no serious risk of drowning. I think.
  18. Hmmm. That’s a tricky one. My first inclination is that it’s essentially a 3rd agenda and so he would get to vote on the older law, but I could certainly see an argument for it being a subset of the miscount voting. There is also a question of whether anyone can play riders on the new vote. If they can, then the one player should also be able to vote on it (and potentially play a rider on that one as well), but if the new vote is considered a subset of the miscount agenda, then I would say no one can play riders on it. ok, talking it through like that, I definitely come down on the side of it being a whole new vote. We’ve had other situations where a rider was basically a free benefit, so that doesn’t worry me, and keeping it as a 3rd vote is simpler.
  19. Shouldn’t be too difficult to add hoc something until an 8 player expansion comes out. It’s not like they introduced a bunch of new units, you can just use the old units for 2 players. The old hexes will leave a bit of a gap on the board, but that shouldn’t be a problem. Hardest thing would be creating 2 new tech decks, but since they don’t need to be randomized or hidden or anything, a scanner and printer should sort that.
  20. Ooh. I didn’t know about that store. I’ll have to check it out.
  21. Whereabouts in Ohio? I moved down to Columbus and am having a difficult time getting out to the game stores to play.
  22. Might want to check this out for some inspiration https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZhSyBdyUG8
  23. I have the impression that after the initial conquest most of the fleet withdrew and there was just the one control ship at that point. Doesn't change your fundamental point, but still...
×
×
  • Create New...