Proud to be ignoring?

The Firespray with Slave-1 can't use this with torps, right? The card itself uses the one and only torp slot.

I like the fix. It's not a panacea, but it's a nice improvement. It'd be even better if ordnance had its own attack phase before all other attacks.

No, commence complaining.

As long as it takes.

Have you see the redundant threads on new damage decks, version 2 core set, prequel ships, and ordnance fixes, every new ship/upgrade is overpowered/breaks the game, and "OMG, did the boat sink--when will the new wave arrive"?

I imagine the T-Wing will be exactly the same as the X-Wing, but with new astromechs, maybe the system slot or a brand new type of upgrade. More importantly, it'll come with the X-Wing/T-Wing title card for the buff players have been wanting.

I'll give you that the XG-1 looks pretty sweet. No hard feelings, fellas. And who knows? There could be a prequel game in the future, and there's always Shapeways for homebrewery.

To be fair, Ordnance needs a fix pretty badly. Who the hell uses it? But yeah, I hate to say it but you may have a point there. For once I actually agree with both of you.

Breaking news: K-Wing is preferential to both N-1 and ARC-170. Episodes VII-IX and the two spinoffs will keep the product line busy for years, well past the "nostalgic" 20th anniversary of the prequel movies. FFG hasn't changed their mind about something so important yet (no one has shown me otherwise), so there's no reason to believe they'd want to long after anyone even remembers how much they disliked the prequels.

Thought so. Just pick a reasonable date if you're so confident (and it seems you're not). If they're so iconic, FFG's CEO will change his mind sooner than later. Or do you suggest that they will be the very last wave, scraping the bottom of the barrel just before closing the game production?

As asked in the other thread, would you care to wager that for the inclusion of the N-1 or ARC-170 into the current version of XMG?

Would you care to make a wager about the inclusion of the N-1 or ARC-170 into this version of XMG?

Some people refuse evidence and continue to believe whatever they want regardless. It's called willful ignorance.

No. The quote is the original post of this thread. The line is, "More generally we're looking at the sort of game as it is, the Galactic Civil War going way forward". Correct, but that's not what I claim or what FFG's CEO stated. Man, where have you been? And this is why I keep doing what I do. Despite what FFG, the designer and producer of the game, states is their intention, you and small faction of die hards not just believe otherwise--which is totally cool--but you keep reminding us constantly. And when you do, expect me to be there to also remind you and everyone else what FFG actually said.

I don't understand your first "sentence". You may recommend and swallow your own pill. There's nothing Wheatonish about pointing out that FFG said they won't introduce the prequel movie ships into the GCW game, except that you want them to. That's the only thing Wheatonish about it, and I only bring it up when you guys go on and on and on about it, just to remind others what the official position is.

So they didn't deny additional factions and weren't trying to play coy, but just offer the best info at hand: just two for now. Does anyone have any evidence to back up Bipolar Potter's claims? I think he abandoned them when I asked for for some evidence.

Thanks, I appreciate the effort, but even you admit they aren't saying there won't ever be other factions. According to this evidence, they haven't changed their mind on anything. I am curious if they ever did about factions or big ships, but would like to see the evidence myself.

Of course you would. You like them. A lot of people find them hideous* and would rather they be buried. Fortunately, FFG has stated what their position on the matter is. * The N-1 is a glitter mosquito and the ARC-170 is an awkward, 6-winged insect.

When did FFG make those declarations? Where can I see or hear it myself? Pre wave 3, during a panel discussion, and in some of the interviews done at trade shows. I don't want to send the time searching for a link, but you're welcome to do so, or maybe someone else can point you to them. I believe the faction question was in the same QA session that ended with people having a chance to guess the U revealed 4th wave 3 ship. The no large ship quote was a little sneakily done, and is not a direct quote. That came up a couple times, but was pre-tantive announcement and pre wave 2, when people were expecting to call the falcon a medium ship - they became "large ships". later, the transport was released as a huge ship, and skirted their previous statement of no big ships. (Hence sneaky) if this wasn't in that same QA it was in one of the interviews done at worlds, possibly in FFG's own cast or recap video. I provided evidence. I'd like to believe you, truly, but I'd need a link to an interview video or something.

I was just kidding. I even wrote it in the original post.

GenCon said they won't make a prequel game. There's a more recent interview with Alex Davy. No, check out the No Prequel Ships Settled Thread. He didn't say they wouldn't make a prequel game, unless we're referring to two different answers/quotes.https://community.fantasyflightgames.com/index.php?/topic/114870-no-prequel-ships-settled/ What did Alex Davey say? Can I read/watch/listen?

All? Bold, considering I've never gotten one thread locked. You're either a liar, misinformed, or have a terrible memory. Wrong quote dude. Anywho, comes on guys let's not fight. If this gets locked i'll make a point to make another Thread for the ARC, and one for the V-wing. And also one for the Torrent. Also the Rebels CANONICALLY used a Lucrahulk (the big round droid ship) in an attack on the mall, so... yeah that can be justified. Oops. Thanks, fixed.

Clearly I'm a fairly obnoxious person and a liar too. From the horse's mouth.

Not what I'd expect from a buddy. Disappointed in you, buddy.