Jump to content

z0m4d

Members
  • Content Count

    789
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by z0m4d

  1. z0m4d

    ARC 170s (again)

    All? Bold, considering I've never gotten one thread locked. You're either a liar, misinformed, or have a terrible memory.
  2. Yes, the Internet is the ideal medium for deadpan. If only we could express emotions with grammatical keys so readers know we're not being serious. Edit: And I don't believe he was kidding. He only said so after he was called out and realized he was in the wrong.
  3. z0m4d

    ARC 170s (again)

    But contrary to the evidence at hand, I want to believe badly enough that you will one day be my buddy, so I will constantly remind you by calling you my buddy. I'm sorry if this annoys you. Please don't be a hater. You know what "More generally" means, right? I'd be happy to provide you plenty of evidence. But first, are you going to provide evidence to back up your claim that FFG said there would be only two factions and no big ships?
  4. You're all freaking idiots. I'm just kidding. See how that goes?
  5. z0m4d

    ARC 170s (again)

    So, hey, buddy. How about that acknowledgment you promised? Are you still looking for evidence that FFG said there would be only two factions and no big ships? I really want to believe you. I furnished proof.
  6. True. Until somebody makes something up and suddenly they were used in the GCW. Sure. Hold your breath for the canon to introduce the N-1 and ARC-170 into the GCW. Dive much?
  7. You mean like this: https://community.fantasyflightgames.com/index.php?/topic/150637-n-1-starfighter-more-proof-lucas-doesnt-listen/page-19#entry1573196
  8. Said Mr pot to Mr kettle.You do nothing but push for prequel crap to be included don't try and come off all high and mighty. You've only got to look at these forums to see how divisive the subject is adding clone wars ships to a game called x-wing will do nothing but harm the community and then the game. Look at 40k and how unbound rules have sharply divided the players. I do nothing but push for "Prequel Crap"? Huh, I didn't know The Ghost, XG-1s, Missile Boats, YT-2000s, and other assorted vessels were from the prequel era. Go figure. Pardon me if I just like the idea of really varied ships like the N1 and the ARC-170, or perhaps even the ETA-2. There's a difference between ships that were produced and used prior to GCW, and then used in the GCW, and the ships in the prequel movies, which were not used in the GCW. Said Mr pot to Mr kettle.You do nothing but push for prequel crap to be included don't try and come off all high and mighty. You've only got to look at these forums to see how divisive the subject is adding clone wars ships to a game called x-wing will do nothing but harm the community and then the game. Look at 40k and how unbound rules have sharply divided the players. Why would it harm the community? Many of us can't stand unimaginative EU b******s that looks like a 12 year old "designed" (on in some cases, assembled it by accident after they broke their TIE Fighter) it, and their inclusion hasn't ruined the game or the community. If some people are so selfish that the inclusion of a ship they don't like, which would make many people happy, would cause them to "harm the community and then the game" then I feel sorry for such people but shan't miss them. Like the YV-666 (really? I mean that's not a randomly chosen number. That's edgelordy as hell to pick. No pun intended.), or the Mist Hunter, or The god forsaken VONG. But aside from the Vong I'd be okay with those ships. I'd begrudgingly _deal_ with The Vong but they really only have The Coralskipper. But it wouldn't make me leave the game. I just really like variety, even if it's not variety I'm particularly fond of. Because it adds something new. New isn't always good. If you don't apply other qualifiers, this is what happens: http://goo.gl/W7N5rI
  9. It's only when the "Prequel Ships WILL Come" threads start popping up. Because they won't.
  10. z0m4d

    ARC 170s (again)

    Regardless, he also unmistakenly said the game is the Galactic Civil War going way forward. I'd like to see a reference to FFG saying there'd be no huge ship or third faction.
  11. I resurrected this in response to a prequel thread resurrected. Yes, FFG will make whatever they want. The CEO said the game is the GCW going way forward.
  12. z0m4d

    ARC 170s (again)

    https://community.fantasyflightgames.com/index.php?/topic/114870-no-prequel-ships-settled/ With reference to the video so you can hear it yourself.
  13. z0m4d

    ARC 170s (again)

    The words out of the CEO of FFG are tired and unsubstantiated?
  14. z0m4d

    ARC 170s (again)

    And FFG has spoken.
  15. When did FFG make those declarations? Where can I see or hear it myself?
  16. z0m4d

    ARC 170s (again)

    The prequel movie ships are so hated because they're ugly, don't fit with the design style of GCW era ships, weren't particularly powerful in their own era much less GCW, are no longer in use by GCW, and by extension never saw combat in the GCW. They don't belong in a combat miniatures game about the GCW. I don't understand how you don't understand that. They're hated beyond the question of their inclusion in the game. Part of the argument against their inclusion in the game is the somewhat irrational hatred of the prequel ships. As to them being ugly, that's incredibly subjective, and it makes little sense in the face of people supporting ships like the Hound's Tooth, Slave II, the Mist Hunter, and worst of all the K-wing, all of which are less than attractive. But continue to denigrate other people and be snide, you seem to thoroughly enjoy that. OK, then just these reasons:
  17. z0m4d

    ARC 170s (again)

    The prequel movie ships are so hated because they're ugly, don't fit with the design style of GCW era ships, weren't particularly powerful in their own era much less GCW, are no longer in use by GCW, and by extension never saw combat in the GCW. They don't belong in a combat miniatures game about the GCW. I don't understand how you don't understand that.
  18. z0m4d

    ARC 170s (again)

    They don't. See the CEO's comment from GenCon 2014 In Flight Report.
  19. He didn't, but the game is the GCW going way forward. I'm merely preempting the counter that the YT, Y-Wing, and Z-95 were produced prior to the start of the GCW. Some pre-GCW era ships have fought in the GCW and we see them in the game. The prequel movie ships have not fought in the GCW and therefore are not in the game because, again, the game is the Galactic Civil War going way forward.
  20. With the recent resurgence (and resurrection) of prequel ship threads, I'll remind everyone again what Christian Peterson, CEO of FFG, said at the 2014 In-Flight Report at GenCon: In other words, the game is not intended to include pre-GCW ships, unless those ships already appear in GCW canon material.
  21. You're kidding, right? Mazz0, trying to steer the topic to his off-topic obsession, and Captain Lackwit with such ridiculously outrageous stats. But hey, if you love it you make up anything you want.
  22. Not only do you want the N-1 included in a GCW game, but you also want it outperform more advanced fighters. A bit biased?
  23. The C-130 transport has several combat designator roles after retrofitting.
  24. So do you believe FFG will introduce the N-1 into the current GCW version of X-Wing, or is this mostly fanciful wishing and home brewing?
×
×
  • Create New...