Jump to content

GooeyChewie

Members
  • Content count

    221
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About GooeyChewie

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    -
  • MSN
    -
  • Website URL
    -
  • ICQ
    -
  • Yahoo
    -
  • Skype
    -

Profile Information

  • Location
    Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. GooeyChewie

    Executer and Axe

    I would have if I had not seen the cards on FB before I saw them here. The character is actually titled Executioner, not Executor.
  2. GooeyChewie

    Solo in Destiny - Potential Spoilers

    With spoilers, lots of spoilers.... no seriously, SPOILERS I want a Blue Villain Qi’Ra, master of Teras Kasi.
  3. GooeyChewie

    I love this new plot

    I agree with Joey. By the time you build this card up in a damage deck, you probably could have gotten the same damage out of the extra die you could have had with the 3 points that you instead dedicated to the plot. With Rex, I think I would rather go eRex/Clone Trooper x2 than Rex/Clone Trooper x2/LTP.
  4. GooeyChewie

    Leia and Dooku confirmed for Way of the Force?

    I’m curious, in what storyline is Dooku presented as a hero? I know he was a former Jedi Master, but I don’t know of a story where we see him in that role (aside from a vision of an alternate life given to and rejected by Yoda in The Clone Wars).
  5. GooeyChewie

    Plo Koon pairings?

    Good news! He gains the abilities of each non-unique character you have, and nothing prevents him from having two copies of the same ability (unless that ability is a keyword such as Guardian).
  6. GooeyChewie

    New set is called Ways of the force .

    The big reason I prefer Dooku over 7th Sister in this case is because I own the former and not the latter. :-)
  7. GooeyChewie

    New set is called Ways of the force .

    The new GG doesn’t care about being elite for his Power Action. I’m thinking single die GG, elite Dooku. Then your opponent has to choose between focusing on Dooku, potentially facing down a beefed up GG late game, or focusing on GG, leaving a difficult-to-kill Dooku for the end game. I’m not a huge fan of Bo-Katan. The deckbuilding ability seems cool, but we know from the original Finn that it isn’t necessarily a big deal. She shows high theoretical damage, but it’s spread out across two damage types and a special. I don’t think she’s bad per se, but not really worth 15/20. Luke? He’s awesome. At only 15 points, the biggest question is who to pair him with. Secura and a 3-point plot? Yoda and a 2-point plot? Poe? Maz and the new 4-point plot? So many options, and we haven’t even seen who all he can worth with in this set!
  8. GooeyChewie

    Help with wookie warrior x 2

    If you go blue over red, you have to stock other resource-generating cards to pay for the Wookiee damage sides. Yellow hero does have such cards, so you can go either way, but Electrostaff helps a LOT.
  9. GooeyChewie

    Resolving dice and second chance

    When you take the resolve dice action, you resolve dice one at a time, with the exception of modifiers, in an order of your choice. So you can absolutely do 4, let Second Chance trigger, then do 5 more.
  10. GooeyChewie

    Dealing with Special Chaining

    I agree they’ll likely change the “resolve dice” action such that you cannot resolve dice which were not facing the right symbol at the start of the action. But if my opponent pulled off a Yoda-Chewie-Force Throw special chain against my AT-ST die, I wouldn’t weep. I’d applaud them for pulling it off!
  11. GooeyChewie

    Question about new Finn.

    I kind of want to build a deck in which Finn moves damage to Con Artist for big mills. But Con Artist is Yellow only, making the set-up difficult.
  12. GooeyChewie

    Thoughts on Leadership in Vader/Gunray deck?

    To me, Leadership is the big reason to use Nute over the more outright damaging MagnaGuard.
  13. GooeyChewie

    A thought: EMP and "Droid"

    Okay, but I’ll chalk up the belief that “Discard a droid or vehicle from play.” doesn’t explicitly mean you can discard a droid from play as a sign that FFG needs to rule prior to Battle Droid becoming tournament legal. Because as far as I can tell, there’s no RAW reason that EMP Grenades can’t target this one specific Droid.
  14. GooeyChewie

    A thought: EMP and "Droid"

    Okay, so the rule doesn’t have to explicitly use the term “discard” to cover discard. So why doesn’t EMP Grenades explicitly discard Battle Droid in accordance to The Golden Rule?
  15. GooeyChewie

    A thought: EMP and "Droid"

    So you are saying a rule which doesn’t use the term “discard” is explicit about discarding characters, but a card which literally instructs you to discard a Droid is NOT explicit about discarding the Droid (who happens to be a character)? I’m having trouble wrapping my brain around your logic. At this point, I just want to wait for an FFG ruling.
×