• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About kempy

  • Rank
  • Birthday August 1

Contact Methods

  • AIM
  • MSN
  • Website URL
  • ICQ
  • Yahoo
  • Skype

Profile Information

  • Location
    Shinomen Forest
  1. So I am new

    OMG. In CCGs everyone play with different cards? oO What a mess.
  2. You're talking about actions printed on Unique and costy Personalities in a game where with every Province destroyed your chances to see them decreased a lot. In game where you could kill them even before battle or bow/send home as first battle action. And all i remember from (late) Lotus that before you even had occasion to buy someone as Kokujin (or anyone) you just lost 1 or 2 provinces to Nezumi DotS or Lion Ashigaru blitz decks. And even Kokujin required additional body to work. And about printed PD - it depends on what kind of Personality of course, but yes, open information (even if repeatable) is less dangerous than hidden. Especially when this printed ability may just fade out in a turn or two so you try to play around it. Anyway, comparing such different games and abilities without overall game/environment context is just a mistake. Looking at OP hand and discarding was in Lotus and - thankfully - AEG stopped to print such effects later. Last card i remember with such effect was Soften the Resistance and it was so conditional (looking for lowest FV).
  3. None of these cards look at your hand (in game without handsize limit as LCG is) and discard something from it. They're just about killing things which was (in most editions) so common action as bowing or sending home. Also even if they're available every turn they're on the table, visible to your opponent so he can just play and prepare for them. It's just open board information.
  5. Tell me about your definition of "ultimate fail". Because seems you're just ignoring what actually happened (as business decision). Because for me, as you consider facts (L5R CCG develop status in sugust/september 2015, changing AEG's profile as a firm for few years back, post-sell Zinser's comments) whole situation is much more similiar to selling Lucasfilm to Disney than some absurd geopolitical histories. There's also a secret we will never know, that could explain a lot - amount of money FFG paid for IP. Also in your answer don't forget about visible sine wave of L5R CCG popularity (2000? Late Lotus? Late Emperor?) also what happened to L5R as a brand back in 1997. Selling it to WotC was also "ultimate fail"?
  6. Also DT:R have many corrected/errated cards as Organized Play prizes cards, most of time with alternate illustrations.
  7. This is easily one of the most absurd comparisions i've readed for a long time now.
  8. Which case is therefore more pathetic? And I'm pretty sure L5R stopped being AEG's flagship few years before sell happened.
  9. And with reasonable sucesses. Anyway maybe he just knew too much and told too much so he's first L5R designer that left FFG. Was Ivory Edition a brand new shining game from one of the biggest and well known analog card games developer in the world?
  10. Game is Officially Dead...

    I don't know you really want such changes as L5R LCG and L5R CCG are totally different games. Much better comparision is transition from Netrunner CCG into Android: Netrunner LCG.
  11. Spoiler frequency

    CCG was saturated with many promo cards released between standard expansions like Kotei packs, Summer (Gencon) packs, Holiday packs, Jeweled Events packs, Imperial Assembly cards and quarterly Organized Play kits. Additionaly some unexpected releases happened like Clan of Month, Temptation pieces, Imperial Gifts etc. So imho flow of spoilers was just constant and kept everyone's interest. Also standard expansion's spoiler system was static. 4-5 weeks before street date AEG presented schedule of spoilers that were going to be shown on main page or in clan sites (forums) in some predefined order. When expansion hit shelves whole cardpool was known as many people just compiled them in text or galleries. Later these compilations was replaced by Oracle.
  12. You're just one separate playgroup. Take a look at this from perspective, check data for major post-cycle events (including online ones), check Lotus Pavilion stats etc.
  13. At this point it's not a problem as someone sells, other one buys collections for 40-70% of MSRP and could easily follow future releases. A real problem is when nobody is buying and i see this much more often. I see lot of sell-off offers that have waiting for many days or weeks.
  14. Nope. Too old. Here he goes: